Skip to main content
Log in

Archivers for the representation of the set of approximate solutions for MOPs

  • Published:
Journal of Heuristics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we address the problem of computing suitable representations of the set of approximate solutions of a given multi-objective optimization problem via stochastic search algorithms. For this, we will propose different archiving strategies for the selection of the candidate solutions maintained by the generation process of the stochastic search process, and investigate them further on analytically and empirically. For all archivers we will provide upper bounds on the approximation quality as well as on the cardinality of the limit solution set. We conclude this work by a comparative study on some test problems in order to visualize the effect of all novel archiving strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Moubayed, N., Petrovski, A., McCall, J.: D2MOPSO: MOPSO based on decomposition and dominance with archiving using crowding distance in objective and solution spaces. Evol. Comput. 22(1), 47–77 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanquero, R., Carrizosa, E.: A d.c. biobjective location model. J. Glob. Optim. 23(2), 569–580 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bolintineanu, S.: Vector variational principles; \(\epsilon \)-efficiency and scalar stationarity. J. Convex Anal. 8, 71–85 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K.: Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, Chichester (2001). ISBN 0-471-87339-X

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott, M.: Multicriteria Optimization. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eiben, A.E., Rudolph, G.: Theory of evolutionary algorithms: a bird’s eye view. Theor. Comput. Sci. 1, 3–9 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Engau, A., Wiecek, M.M.: Generating epsilon-efficient solutions in multiobjective programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177(3), 1566–1579 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, O.: Analysis, vol. 3. Vieweg, Braunschweig (1984)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hanne, T.: On the convergence of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 117(3), 553–564 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hanne, T.: Global multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. J. Heuristics 6(3), 347–360 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • He, M., Xiong, F., Sun, J.: Multi-objective optimization of elastic beams for noise reduction. ASME. J. Vib. Acoust. 139(5), 051014 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, C., Sun, J.Q., Schütze, O.: Computing the set of approximate solutions of a multi-objective optimization problem by means of cell mapping techniques. In: Emmerich, M., et al. (eds.) EVOLVE—A Bridge between Probability, Set Oriented Numerics and Evolutionary Computation IV, pp. 171–188. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hillermeier, C.: Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization: A Generalized Homotopy Approach, vol. 135. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Horoba, C., Neumann, F.: Benefits and drawbacks for the use of epsilon-dominance in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2008), pp. 641–648 (2008)

  • Knowles, J.D., Corne, D.W.: Approximating the non-dominated front using the Pareto archived evolution strategy. Evol. Comput. 8(2), 149–172 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, J.D., Corne, D.W.: Metaheuristics for multiobjective optimisation. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 535, chapter Bounded Pareto Archiving: Theory and Practice, pp. 39–64. Springer (2004)

  • Lagunas-Jiménez, J.R., Moo-Yam, V., Ortíz-Moctezuma, B.: Two-degrees-of-freedom robust PID controllers tuning via a multiobjective genetic algorithm. Comput. Sist. 18(2), 259 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumanns, M., Thiele, L., Deb, K., Zitzler, E.: Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Evol. Comput. 10(3), 263–282 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumanns, M., Zenklusen, R.: Stochastic convergence of random search methods to fixed size pareto front approximations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 213(2), 414–421 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • López-Ibáñez, M., Knowles, J.D., Laumanns, M.: On sequential online archiving of objective vectors. In: EMO, pp. 46–60. Springer (2011)

  • Loridan, P.: \(\epsilon \)-solutions in vector minimization problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 42, 265–276 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Machin Navas, M., Nebro Urbaneja, A.J.: Multiobjective adaptive metaheuristics. Comput. Sist. 17(1), 53–62 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Novoa-Hernández, P.: Evolutionary multi-objective optimization for scheduling professor evaluations in Cuban higher education. Comput. Sist. 19(2), 321–335 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Okabe, T., Jin, Y., Olhofer, M., Sendhoff, B.: Parallel problem solving from nature—PPSN VIII. In: 8th International Conference, Birmingham, UK, 18–22 Sept 2004. Proceedings, chapter On Test Functions for Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization, pp. 792–802 (2004)

  • Pareto, V.: Manual of Political Economy. The MacMillan Press, New York (1971). (original edition in French in 1927)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, N., Cuate, O., Schütze, O., Alvarado, A.: Including users preferences in the decision making for discrete many objective optimization problems. Comput. Sist. 20(4), 589–607 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, G.: Finite Markov chain results in evolutionary computation: a tour d’horizon. Fundam. Inform. 35, 67–89 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, G., Agapie, A.: Convergence properties of some multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Conference on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, pp. 1010–1016, Piscataway, New Jersey. IEEE Press (2000)

  • Rudolph, G., Naujoks, B., Preuss, M.: Capabilities of EMOA to detect and preserve equivalent pareto subsets. In: EMO ’03: Proceedings of the Evolutionary Multi-criterion Optimization Conference, pp. 36–50 (2006)

  • Ruhe, G., Fruhwirt, B.: \(\epsilon \)-optimality for bicriteria programs and its application to minimum cost flows. Computing 44, 21–34 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, E.R., Segura, C.: Memetic algorithm with hungarian matching based crossover and diversity preservation. Comput. Sist. 22(2), 347–361 (2018)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Saha, A., Ray, T., Smith, W.: Towards practical evolutionary robust multi-objective optimization. In: 2011 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 2123–2130 (2011)

  • Schaeffler, S., Schultz, R., Weinzierl, K.: Stochastic method for the solution of unconstrained vector optimization problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 114(1), 209–222 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, O., Coello Coello, C.A., Talbi, E.-G.: Approximating the \(\epsilon \)-efficient set of an MOP with stochastic search algorithms. In: Gelbukh, A., Morales, A.F.K. (eds.) Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (MICAI-2007), pp. 128–138. Springer, Berlin (2007a)

  • Schütze, O., Laumanns, M., Tantar, E., Coello, C.A.C., Talbi, E.-G.: Convergence of stochastic search algorithms to gap-free Pareto front approximations. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2007), pp. 892–901 (2007b)

  • Schütze, O., Coello, C.A.C., Tantar, E., Talbi, E.-G.: Computing finite size representations of the set of approximate solutions of an MOP with stochastic search algorithms. In: GECCO ’08: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 713–720, New York, NY, USA. ACM (2008a)

  • Schütze, O., Coello, C.A.C., Mostaghim, S., Talbi, E.-G., Dellnitz, M.: Hybridizing evolutionary strategies with continuation methods for solving multi-objective problems. Eng. Optim. 40(5), 383–402 (2008b)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, O., Laumanns, M., Coello, C.A.C., Dellnitz, M., Talbi, E.-G.: Convergence of stochastic search algorithms to finite size Pareto set approximations. J. Glob. Optim. 41(4), 559–577 (2008c)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, O., Vasile, M., Coello, C.A.C.: Approximate solutions in space mission design. In: PPSN ’08: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving From Nature, pp. 805–814 (2008d)

  • Schütze, O., Esquivel, X., Lara, A., Coello, C.A.C.: Using the averaged Hausdorff distance as a performance measure in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 16(4), 504–522 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, O., Laumanns, M., Tantar, E., Coello, C.A.C., Talbi, E.-G.: Computing gap free Pareto front approximations with stochastic search algorithms. Evol. Comput. 18(1), 65–96 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J.Q.: Vibration and sound radiation of non-uniform beams. J. Sound Vib. 185(5), 827–843 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, T.: A new approach to approximation of solutions in vector optimization problems. In: Fushini, M., Tone, K., (eds.) Proceedings of APORS 1994, pp. 497–504 (1995)

  • Tantar, A.A., Tantar, E., Schütze, O.: Asymmetric quadratic landscape approximation model. In: GECCO ’14: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 493–500 (2014)

  • Vargas, A., Bogoya, J.: A generalization of the averaged Hausdorff distance. Comput. Sist. 22(2), 331–345 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D.J.: Epsilon efficiency. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 49(2), 319–337 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • White, D.J.: Epsilon-dominating solutions in mean–variance portfolio analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 105(3), 457–466 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, J., Gao, S., Wagner, M., Neumann, F.: An adaptive data structure for evolutionary multi-objective algorithms with unbounded archives. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2012 , pp. 1–8 (2012)

  • Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C.M., Da Fonseca, V.G.: Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 7(2), 117–132 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Hernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schütze, O., Hernández, C., Talbi, EG. et al. Archivers for the representation of the set of approximate solutions for MOPs. J Heuristics 25, 71–105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-018-9383-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-018-9383-z

Keywords

Navigation