Abstract
Does speed provide a ‘model for’ rate of change in other contexts? Does JavaMathWorlds (JMW), animated simulation software, assist in the development of the ‘model for’ rate of change? This project investigates the transference of understandings of rate gained in a motion context to a non-motion context. Students were 27 14–15 year old students at an Australian secondary school. The instructional sequence, utilising JMW, provided rich learning experiences of rate of change in the context of a moving elevator. This context connects to students’ prior knowledge. The data taken from pre- and post-tests and student interviews revealed a wide variation in students’ understanding of rate of change. The variation was mapped on a hypothetical learning trajectory and interpreted in the terms of the ‘emergent models’ theory (Gravemeijer, Math Think Learn 1(2):155–177, 1999) and illustrated by specific examples from the data. The results demonstrate that most students were able to use the ‘model of’ rate of change developed in a vertical motion context as a ‘model for’ rate of change in a horizontal motion context. A smaller majority of students were able to use their, often incomplete, ‘model of’ rate of change as a ‘model for’ reasoning about rate of change in a non-motion context.













Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bull, I., Howes, B., Kimber, K., Nolan, C., & Noonan, K. (2003). Maths for Vic 8. South Melbourne Vic.: Longman.
Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352. doi:10.2307/4149958.
Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1994). Exponential functions, rate of change and the multiplicative unit. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 135–164.
Doorman, M. (2002). How to guide students? A reinvention course on modeling motion. In F.-L. Lin (Ed.), Common Sense in Mathematics Education. Proceedings of 2001 The Netherlands and Taiwan Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 97–114). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.
Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Graham, K. (Eds.). (1993). Research in calculus learning: Understanding of limits, derivatives, and integrals. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 155–177. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0102_4.
Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1–3), 111–129. doi:10.1023/A:1003749919816.
Gravemeijer, K., & Stephan, M. (2002). Emergent models as an instructional design heuristic. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 145–169). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kaput, J. J. (1998). Representations, inscriptions, descriptions and learning: A kaleidoscope of windows. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 265–281. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80062-7.
Kaput Center for Research and Innovation in Mathematics Education. (2008). SimCalc projects. Retrieved August 22, 2008, from http://www.kaputcenter.umassd.edu/projects/simcalc/.
Marton, F. (2006). Sameness and difference in transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 499–535. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1504_3.
Mathematics Education Researchers Group. (2004). SimCalc projects. Retrieved August 22, 2005, from http://www.simcalc.umassd.edu.
Nemirovsky, R., & Monk, S. (2000). “If you look at it the other way…” an exploration into the nature of symbolizing. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms (pp. 177–221). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Orton, A. (1983). Students’ understanding of differentiation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 235–250. doi:10.1007/BF00410540.
Rasmussen, C. L., & King, K. D. (2000). Locating starting points in differential equations: A realistic mathematics education approach. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(2), 161–172. doi:10.1080/002073900287219.
Roschelle, J., Kaput, J. J., & Stroup, W. (2000). SimCalc: Accelerating students’ engagement with the mathematics of change. In M. J. K. Jacobson & B. Robert (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 47–75). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Simpson, G., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2006). Exploring the mathematics of motion through construction and collaboration. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 114–136. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00164.x.
Stewart, J. (2007). Essential calculus. CA, US: Thompson Brookes/Cole.
Stroup, W. (2002). Understanding qualitative calculus: A structural synthesis of learning research. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 167–215. doi:10.1023/A:1021147132127.
Swedosh, P., Dowsey, J., Caruso, N., Flynn, P., & Tynan, D. (2007). Mathsworld: CAS active mathematical methods units 1 & 2. Melbourne: McMillan.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), Development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 179–234). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational psychology: Vol. 2. The psychology of learning. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ubuz, B. (2001). First Year engineering students’ learning of point of tangency, numerical calculations of gradients, and the approximate value of a function at a point through computers. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(1), 113–137.
Ubuz, B. (2007). Interpreting a graph and constructing its derivative graph: Stability and change in students’ conceptions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(5), 609–637. doi:10.1080/00207390701359313.
Victorian Curriculum & Assessment Authority. (2007). Victorian essential learning standards: Mathematics. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from http://vels.vcaa.vic.edu.au/essential/discipline/mathematics/.
Wagner, J. F. (2006). Transfer in pieces. Cognition and Instruction, 24(1), 1–71.
Wilhelm, J., & Confrey, J. (2003). Projecting rate of change in the context of motion onto the context of money. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 33(6), 887–904. doi:10.1080/00207390310001606660.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herbert, S., Pierce, R. An ‘Emergent Model’ for Rate of Change. Int J Comput Math Learning 13, 231–249 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-008-9140-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-008-9140-8