Abstract
This paper presents a new mobile software tool, PhotoMAT (Photo Management and Analysis Tool), and students’ experiences with this tool within a scaffolded curricular unit—Neighborhood Safari. PhotoMAT was designed to support learners’ investigations of backyard animal behavior and works with image sets obtained using fixed-position field cameras (“camera traps”) that capture “bursts” of images in response to motion. PhotoMAT was designed to help learners emulate two ways wildlife researchers use camera traps: documenting wildlife diversity via the relative frequency of appearances of different species, and exploring species’ behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Chi, M. T., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1981). Expertise in problem solving. Pittsburgh: Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483.
Gentner, D., & Toupin, C. (1988). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277–300.
Goldman, S., Radinsky, J., Tozer, S., & Wink, D. (2010). Learning as inquiry. In E. Baker, B. McGraw, & P. Penelope (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.
Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18(4), 513–549.
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 283–315). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Lee, H., & Songer, N. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 923–948.
Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87, 517–538.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., et al. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1063–1080.
Metz, K. E. (2004). Children’s understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 219–290.
Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: Bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 7–30.
Shelley, T., Lyons, L., Moher, T., Dasgupta, C., Silva, B.L., & Silva, A. (2014). Information-building applications: Designing for data exploration and analysis by elementary school students. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘14). 2123–2132.
Songer, N. B., Lee, H.-S., & McDonald, S. (2002). Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard. Science Education, 87, 490–516.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shelley, T.R., Dasgupta, C., Silva, A. et al. PhotoMAT: A Mobile Tool for Aiding in Student Construction of Research Questions and Data Analysis. Tech Know Learn 20, 85–92 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9235-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9235-3