Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gamification Design in Education: What Might Give a Sense of Play and Learning?

  • Original research
  • Published:
Technology, Knowledge and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to propose design elements for the use of gamification in educational settings to provide a sense of play and learning to the students. This design-based research was carried out in two implementations, in which two different graduate courses were designed using gamification. The design portion of the study was followed by an assessment, based on which a framework for gamification design was constructed. It was found that the competition-based and intriguing activities of high intrinsic interest resulted in concrete achievements, which motivated the students by giving them a sense of play. In addition, the implementations that supported learning were found to be both collaborative and individual activities that mobilized the students into active participation. In both implementations, the students reported enjoying most of the activities and lessons and found that the competitive implementations incorporating social games into the lesson topics increased their motivation. The resulting framework for the gamification design specifies recommended elements of gamification for increasing learner motivation, active participation, fun, and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Baxter, R. J., Holderness Jr, D. K., & Wood, D. A. (2016). Applying basic gamification techniques to IT compliance training: Evidence from the lab and field. Journal of information systems, 30(3), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51341

  • Brookfield, S. D., Rudolph, J., & Yeo, E. (2019). The power of critical thinking in learning and teaching. An interview with Professor Stephen D. Brookfield. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 76–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P., & Doyle, E. (2016). Gamification and student motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1162–1175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.964263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. H., Shen, C., & Qiu, Y. Z. (2019). Students’ acceptance of gamification in higher education. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 9(2), 1–19. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2019040101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational researcher, 32(1), 9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial

    Google Scholar 

  • De-Marcos, L., Garcia-Lopez, E., & Garcia-Cabot, A. (2016). On the effectiveness of game-like and social approaches in learning: Comparing educational gaming, gamification & social networking. Computers & Education, 95, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.008

  • Deterding, S. (2011, May 7). Situated motivational affordances of game elements: A conceptual model. Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts, a workshop, ACM CHI Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Retrieved from http://gamification-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/09-Deterding.pdf

  • Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francisco-Aparicio, A., Guti’errez-Vela, F., Isla-Montes, J., & Sanches, J. (2013). Gamification: Analysis and application. In V. Penichet (Ed.), New trends in interaction, virtual reality and modeling, human computer interaction series (pp. 113–126). London: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow, and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170–179. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, B., & Hew, K. F. (2018). Implementing a theory-driven gamification model in higher education flipped courses: Effects on out-of-class activity completion and quality of artifacts. Computers & Education, 125, 254–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Sommer, M., Zhu, J., Stephen, A., Valle, N. … Li, J. (2020). The impact of gamification in educational settings on student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1875–1901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. (1950). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Boston: The Beacon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2017). A definition for gamification: Anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature. Electronic Markets, 27(1), 21–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0212-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco: Pfieffer

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiorgas, D. N., & Niemann, S. (2017). Gamification and game-based learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(4), 499–519. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516665105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B. (2015). Designing gamification in the right way. Library Technology Reports, 51(2), 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaving, K., & Björk, S. (2013, October). Designing for fun and play: Exploring possibilities in design for gamification. In Proceedings of the first International conference on gameful design, research, and applications (pp. 131–134)

  • Kuzu, A., Çankaya, S., & Mısırlı, Z. A. (2011). Tasarım tabanlı araştırma ve öğrenme ortamlarının tasarımı ve geliştirilmesinde kullanımı. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 1(1), 19–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Landers, R. N. (2014). Developing a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 752–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2), 146

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin-Siegler, X., Dweck, C. S., & Cohen, G. L. (2016). Instructional interventions that motivate classroom learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333–369. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(81)80017-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patall, E. A., Pituch, K. A., Steingut, R. R., Vasquez, A. C., Yates, N., & Kennedy, A. A. (2019). Agency and high school science students’ motivation, engagement, and classroom support experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 62, 77–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocca, K. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903505936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, A., Coelho, A., & Aguiar, A. (2011). Boobo World – A collaborative videogame to introduce programming concepts to childreen. 4th annual conference in science and art of video games (VideoJogos 2011), Porto, Portugal

  • Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371–380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Educating for innovation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau, W. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Lai, H. H. (2018). Examining the core knowledge on Facebook. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 52–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda, A. M., Carmo, da Silva, R. M., Bittencourt, A. P., I. I., & Isotani, S. (2019). An approach for planning and deploying gamification concepts with social networks within educational contexts. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 294–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Roy, R., & Zaman, B. (2019). Unravelling the ambivalent motivational power of gamification: A basic psychological needs perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, 38–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Pennsylvania: Wharton Digital Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, B. E. (2016). An overview and study on the use of games, simulations, and gamification in higher education. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 6(1), 18–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2016010102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zainuddin, Z. (2018). Students’ learning performance and perceived motivation in gamified flipped-class instruction. Computers & Education, 126, 75–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Fiş Erümit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

APPENDIX 1. Interview Questions

1-What are your overall views about this lesson?

2- What are the activities that you liked in our gamification implementation?

3- What are the activities that you did not like in our gamification implementation?

4- Can you compare lessons taught with traditional methods with the lesson taught this term in relation to factors such as method, enjoyment, and motivation?

5- Was the reward system in the gamification implementation adequate and appropriate? What other ways of rewarding can be used?

6- What activities in the lesson gave you a sense of a play? Why?

7- What are the activities from which you obtained the best learning outcomes? Why?

APPENDIX 2. Description of Gamification Activities

Activities

Activity name

Collaborative learning activities

“Four paper” activity: In this activity, students were divided into four groups. Each group was given a piece of paper and asked to tell the history of the game. These narratives were carried out in the form of painting, story writing, newspaper news and poetry writing. Each group carried out their work for 5 min, and when the time was up, they gave their paper to the next group. In this way, four rounds were made.

“Four materials” activity: Each group was given 2 glasses, 2 paper clips, 1 ping pong ball and rope. It was asked to produce a game from these materials in 15 min. Thus, students were provided with the simplest way to experience the game design process and to identify the difficulties experienced in game design.

Drama activity: Words covering cognitive learning theories and cognitive psychology were prepared by the lecturer and researcher before the lesson. These words were explained by the students using the drama method in the classroom.

Competitive activities

“Game basket” game: In this activity, a social game was applied by associating it with the subject of the lesson. First, a mother was selected in the class. The game and non-game elements of Huizinga were written on paper. These papers are scattered on the floor. Except for the mother, each student went on a piece of paper and changed places with the commands “it’s a game” or “it’s not a game” given by the lecturer.

“Tenant-land owner” game: First of all, a social game was played with all the students. At the end of the game, the students were asked how this game could be used for an educational purpose. The class was divided into groups of three and each group planned this game by adapting it to a topic they wanted. The groups presented the topic they adapted in turn to the class, and these presentations were shared in the Facebook group of the lesson.

Individual activities

“Real-time research” activity: “What effects can games have on people?” This activity was held to answer the question. First, the keywords for the research question were created and 5 research questions were developed with the words selected from among them. The class was divided into five groups and each group chose one of these questions. Within the framework of these questions, the groups were given 30 min to collect data. Data were collected from the people they could reach within the faculty about the research topic. Finally, the collected data was reported, and a group presentation was made in the class.

Social networking activities: Each week, the video, information, or document related to the topic of the week, or the lesson was shared on the Facebook group of the lesson or on Edmodo. In addition, comments were written on the questions asked by the students.

Sharing passwords: Each week, students were given articles on the topic of the week. Passwords have been added to these articles. With the passwords, the students were asked to perform the tasks that differed every week and were hidden in the article. Each password was requested to be shared on Edmodo or Facebook group.

Intriguing activities

Compass activity: This activity is prepared to explain “gamification”. Four encrypted compasses were prepared for the activity. Each group, moving from the starting point with the same compass, found the other three compasses in their hiding places and struggled to come first to their destination. This activity is planned to teach concepts related to gamification.

“Knowing each other” activity: The activity was implemented in the classroom. Fifteen questions were asked. Eight of these questions are personal questions that the student will ask a friend in class. Seven questions are about cognitive learning.

Sharing the leaderboard

Winning a trophy, badge, and point: The leaderboard, which includes trophies and badges earned each week, has been shared on Facebook and Edmodo. The points added to the exam results according to the trophies they won were shared with the students.

Informing about gamification

At the beginning of the semester, students were informed about gamification. In addition, the students were informed about the points, badges, levels, and cups they earned during the semester.

Weekly award ceremony

Trophy painting: This activity was carried out by having students paint a real trophy picture. Thus, it was ensured that the students who were behind in participation in activities or in the number of trophies were aware of their situation. Thus, it was tried to increase participation in the activities.

Badge-pinning in class: The student who wins the most trophies each week is given the badge of the week in the class.

End-of semester award ceremony

Trophy ceremony: Real trophies on which the terms related to gamification were printed were given to the top three students.

Level-up Strategies

Activities to earn additional trophies: Activities are planned for the lower-level students on the leaderboard to win additional trophies.

Reflection of gamification scores to the final grade

Adding point to pass mark: Points are added to the pass mark of the students according to the trophies they have won.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fiş Erümit, S., Karakuş Yılmaz, T. Gamification Design in Education: What Might Give a Sense of Play and Learning?. Tech Know Learn 27, 1039–1061 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09604-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09604-y

Keywords

Navigation