Skip to main content
Log in

Blind separation of audio signals using trigonometric transforms and wavelet denoising

  • Published:
International Journal of Speech Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of blind separation of audio signals from noisy mixtures. It proposes the application of a blind separation algorithm on the discrete cosine transform (DCT) or the discrete sine transform (DST) of the mixed signals, instead of performing the separation on the mixtures in the time domain. Wavelet denoising of the noisy mixtures is recommended in this paper as a preprocessing step for noise reduction. Both the DCT and the DST have an energy compaction property, which concentrates most of the signal energy in a few coefficients in the transform domain, leaving most of the transform domain coefficients close to zero. As a result, the separation is performed on a few coefficients in the transform domain. Another advantage of signal separation in transform domains is that the effect of noise on the signals in the transform domains is smaller than that in the time domain due to the averaging effect of the transform equations, especially when the separation algorithm is preceded by a wavelet denoising step. The simulation results confirm the superiority of transform domain separation to time domain separation and the importance of the wavelet denoising step.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chan, D. C. (1997). Blind signal separation. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.

  • Crochiere, R. E., Tribolet, J. E., & Rabiner, L. R. (1980). An interpretation of the log likelihood ratio as a measure of waveform coder performance. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 28(3), 318–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curnew, S. R., & How, J. (2007). Blind signal separation in MIMO OFDM systems using ICA and fractional sampling. In Signals, systems and electronics, ISSSE’07, international symposium (pp. 67–70).

  • Dam, H. H., Nordholm, S., Low, S. Y., & Cantoni, A. (2007). Blind signal separation using steepest descent method. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 55(8), 4198–4207.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dam, H. H., Cantoni, A., Nordholm, S., & Teo, K. L. (2008). Second-order blind signal separation for convolutive mixtures using conjugate gradient. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 15, 79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubichek, R. (1993). Mel-cepstral distance measure for objective speech quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE pacific rim conference on communications, computers and signal processing (pp. 125–128).

  • Manmontri, U., & Naylor, P. A. (2008). A class of Frobenius norm-based algorithms using penalty term and natural gradient for blind signal separation. IEEE Transactions Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 16(6), 1181–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, E., Pesquet, J. C., & Thirion-Moreau, N. (2007). Convolutive blind signal separation based on asymmetrical contrast functions. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 55(1), 356–371.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka, A., Uhlir, J., Rayner, P. J. W., & Kingsbury, N. J. (1998). Signal analysis and prediction. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai, Y., & Mitsuhashi, W. (2008). A study on the property of blind source separation for preprocessing of an acoustic echo cancellar. In SICE annual conference, August 2008 (pp. 13 – 18).

  • Szupiluk, R., Wojewnik, P., & Zabkowski, T. (2006). Blind signal separation methods for integration of neural networks results. In Information fusion, 2006 9th international conference (pp. 1–6).

  • Walker, J. S. (1999). A primer on wavelets and their scientific applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Sekey, A., & Gersho, A. (1992). An objective measure for predicting subjective quality of speech coders. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 10(5), 819–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Won, Y. G., & Lee, S. Y. (2008). Convolutive blind signal separation by estimating mixing channels in time domain. Electronics Letters, 44(21), 1277–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., Benbouchta, M., & Yantorno, R. (1998). Performance of the modified bark spectral distortion as an objective speech quality measure. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conf. on acoustic, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), Washington, USA (Vol. 1, pp. 541–544).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fathi E. Abd El-Samie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammam, H., Elazm, A.A., Elhalawany, M.E. et al. Blind separation of audio signals using trigonometric transforms and wavelet denoising. Int J Speech Technol 13, 1–12 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-010-9066-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-010-9066-0

Keywords

Navigation