Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Language and Space: a two-level semantic approach based on principles of ontological engineering

  • Published:
International Journal of Speech Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An increasing number of applications for dialogue systems presuppose an ability to deal appropriately with space. Dialogues with assistance systems, intelligent mobility devices and navigation systems all commonly involve the use of spatial language. For smooth interaction, this spatial language cannot be interpreted ‘in the abstract’—it must instead be related directly to a user’s physical location, orientation, goals and needs and be embedded appropriately in a system’s interaction. This is far from straightforward. The situated interpretation of natural language concerning space, spatial relationships and spatial activities represents an unsolved challenge at this time. Despite extensive work on spatial language involving many disciplines, there are no generally accepted accounts that provide support for the kind of flexible language use observed in real human-human spatial dialogues. In this paper, I review some recent approaches to the semantics for natural language expressions concerning space in order to motivate a two-level semantic-based approach to the interpretation of spatial language. This draws on a new combination of natural language processing and principles of ontological engineering and stands as a foundation for more sophisticated and natural dialogue system behavior where spatial information is involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, N., & Sablayrolles, P. (1995). A typology and discourse semantics for motion verbs and spatial PPs in French. Journal of Semantics, 12(1), 163–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aurnague, M., & Vieu, L. (1993). Toward a formal representation of space in language: a commonsense reasoning approach. In F. Anger, H. Guesgen, & J. van Benthem (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on spatial language and temporal reasoning at the 13th international joint conference in artificial intelligence (IJCAI-93), Chambry (pp. 123–158).

  • Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., & Patel-Schneider, P. (Eds.) (2003). The description logic handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, J. A. (1997). Enabling technology for multilingual natural language generation: the KPML development environment. Natural Language Engineering, 3(1), 15–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, J. A. (2010a). Ontological diversity: the case from space. In A. Galton & R. Mizoguchi (Eds.), Formal ontology in information systems (FOIS 2010). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, J. A. (2010b). Situating spatial language and the role of ontology: issues and outlook, Linguistics and Language Compass (to appear).

  • Bateman, J. A., & Farrar, S. (2004). Spatial ontology baseline (SFB/TR8 internal report I1-[OntoSpace]: D2). Collaborative Research Center for Spatial Cognition, University of Bremen, Germany.

  • Bateman, J. A., Henschel, R., & Rinaldi, F. (1995). Generalized Upper Model 2.0: documentation (Technical report). GMD/Institut für Integrierte Publikations- und Informationssysteme, Darmstadt, Germany. http://purl.org/net/gum2

  • Bateman, J., Tenbrink, T., & Farrar, S. (2007). The role of conceptual and linguistic ontologies in discourse. Discourse Processes, 44(3), 175–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, M. (1988). On the grammar of local prepositions. In M. Bierwisch, W. Motsch, & I. Zimmermann (Eds.), Syntax, Semantik, und Lexikon: Rudolf Ruzicka zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 1–65). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billen, R., & Clementini, E. (2004). A model for ternary projective relations between regions. In Lecture notes in computer science : Vol. 2992. Advances in database technology—proceedings of EDBT 2004 (pp. 310–328). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. (1999). Learning how to structure space for language: a crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 385–436). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, L. A., & van der Zee, E. (Eds.) (2005). Functional features in language and space: insights from perception, categorization and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson-Radvansky, L., & Irwin, D. (1993). Frames of reference in vision and language: where is above? Cognition, 46, 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coventry, K. R., & Garrod, S. C. (2004). Essays in cognitive psychology series. Saying, seeing and acting. The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coventry, K., Tenbrink, T., & Bateman, J. (Eds.) (2009). Spatial language and dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M. (1997). The description of routes: a cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 16, 409–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschenbach, C. (1999). Geometric structures of frames of reference and natural language semantics. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1(4), 329–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francez, N., & Steedman, M. (2006). Categorial grammar and the semantics of contextual prepositional phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29, 381–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. U. (1997). Spatial ontology: a geographical information point of view. In O. Stock (Ed.), Spatial and temporal reasoning (pp. 135–153). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, A., & Hood, J. (2005). Anchoring: a new approach to handling indeterminate location in GIS. In A. G. Cohn & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Proceedings of spatial information theory: international conference, COSIT 2005 (pp. 1–13). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N. (1998). Formal ontology and information systems. In N. Guarino (Ed.), Formal ontology in information systems (FOIS) (pp. 3–18). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 1084–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits, A. (1986). Studies in natural language processing. Language and spatial cognition: an interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hois, J., Tenbrink, T., Ross, R., & Bateman, J. (2008). The generalized upper model spatial extension: a linguistically-motivated ontology for the semantics of spatial language (SFB/TR8 internal report). Collaborative Research Center for Spatial Cognition, University of Bremen, Germany. Version 3.0.

  • Jackendoff, R. (1999). The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). Studies in linguistics and philosophy: Vol. 42. From discourse to logic: introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. London: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klippel, A., Tappe, T., Kulik, L., & Lee, P. U. (2005). Wayfinding choremes—a language for modeling conceptual route knowledge. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 16(4), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kracht, M. (2002). On the semantics of locatives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 157–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kracht, M. (2006). Directionality selection. In P. Saint-Dizier (Ed.), Linguistic dimensions of the syntax and semantics of prepositions (pp. 101–114). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kracht, M. (2008). The fine structure of spatial expressions. In A. Asbury, J. Dotlacil, B. Gehrke, & R. Nouwen (Eds.), The structure of local P (pp. 35–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. (1998). The origins of telicity. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (pp. 197–235). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruijff, G.-J. M., Zender, H., Jensfelt, P., & Christensen, H. I. (2007). Situated dialogue and spatial organization: what, where…and why? International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 4(1), 125–138. Special Issue on Human-Robot Interaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutz, O., Lutz, C., Wolter, F., & Zakharyaschev, M. (2004). ℰ-Connections of abstract description systems. Artificial Intelligence, 156(1), 1–73.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, B., & Jackendoff, R. (1993). ‘What’ and ‘where’ in spatial language and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations in cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levit, M., & Roy, D. (2006). Interpretation of spatial language in a map navigation task. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 37(3), 667–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani, I., Hitzeman, J., & Clark, C. (2008a). Annotating natural language geographic references. In Proceedings of the workshop on methodologies and resources for processing spatial language at the 6th international conference on language resources and evaluation, Marrakech, Morocco (pp. 11–15).

  • Mani, I., Hitzeman, J., Richer, J., Harris, D. R., Quimby, R., & Wellner, B. (2008b). SpatialML: annotation scheme, corpora, and tools. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’08), Marrakech, Morocco. http://sourceforge.net/projects/spatialml.

  • Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Bateman, J. A. (1991). Text generation and systemic-functional linguistics: experiences from English and Japanese. London: Frances Pinter Publishers and St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randell, D., Cui, Z., & Cohn, A. (1992). A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on knowledge representation and reasoning (pp. 165–176). San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A., Sharif, B., Egenhofer, M., & Mark, D. M. (1998). Natural-language spatial relations between linear and areal objects: the topology and metric of English-language terms. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12(3), 215–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauh, R., Hagen, C., Knauff, M., Kuss, T., Schlieder, C., & Strube, G. (2005). Preferred and alternative mental models in spatial reasoning. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(2–3), 239–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. J. (2008a). Reusable grammatical resources for spatial language processing. In Workshop on methodologies and resources for processing spatial language at LREC 2008, Marrakech, Morocco.

  • Ross, R. J. (2008b). Tiered models of spatial language interpretation. In C. Freksa, N. S. Newcombe, P. Gärdenfors, & S. Wölfl (Eds.), Lecture notes in artificial intelligence : Vol. 5241. Spatial cognition VI: learning, reasoning and talking about space (pp. 233–249). Berlin: Springer. International Conference, Spatial Cognition 2008, Freiburg, Germany.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. J. (2009). Situated dialogue systems: agency & spatial meaning in task-oriented dialogue. PhD thesis, Universitat Bremen.

  • Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: theory, research, and application (pp. 225–282). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (2006). The fundamental system of spatial schemas in language. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 37–47). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrink, T. (2007). Space, time, and the use of language: an investigation of relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 66, 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. (1993). A theory of aspectuality. The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallentin, M., Østergaarda, S., Lund, T. E., Østergaard, L., & Roepstorff, A. (2005). Concrete spatial language: See what I mean? Brain and Language, 92, 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, D. (1991). How do prepositional phrases fit into compositional syntax and semantics? Linguistics, 29, 591–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts, J. (2005). Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(6), 739–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Linguistics and Literary Sciences & SFB/TR8 Spatial Cognition Research Center, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

    John A. Bateman

Authors
  1. John A. Bateman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Bateman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bateman, J.A. Language and Space: a two-level semantic approach based on principles of ontological engineering. Int J Speech Technol 13, 29–48 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-010-9069-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-010-9069-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation