Skip to main content
Log in

A new approach to acoustic analysis of two British regional accents—Birmingham and Liverpool accents

  • Published:
International Journal of Speech Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accent is a reflection of an individual speaker’s regional affiliation and is shaped by the speaker’s community background. This study investigated the acoustic characteristics of two British regional accents—the Birmingham and Liverpool accents—and their correlations from a different approach. In contrast to previous accent-related research, where the databases are formed from large groups of single-accent speakers, this study uses data from an individual who can speak in two accents, thus removing the effects of inter-speaker variability and facilitating efficient identification and analysis of the accent acoustic features. Acoustic features such as formant frequencies, pitch slope, intensity and phone duration have been used to investigate the prominent features of each accent. The acoustic analysis was based on nine monophthongal vowels and three diphthongal vowels. In addition, an analysis of variance of formant frequencies along the time dimension was performed to study the perceived effects of vocal tract shape changes as the speaker switches between the two accents. The results of the analysis indicate that the formant frequencies, pitch slope, the intensity and the phone duration all vary between the two accents. Classification testing using linear discriminant analysis showed that intensity had the strongest effect on differentiating between the two accents followed by F3, vowel duration, F2 and pitch slope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adank, P., Hout, R. V., & Velde, H. V. (2007). An acoustic description of the vowels of northern and southern standard Dutch II: Regional varieties. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 1130–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajmera, J., McCowan, I., & Bourlard, H. (2003). Speech/music segmentation using entropy and dynamism features in a HMM classification framework. Speech Communication, 40(3), 351–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, L. M., & Hansen, J. H. L. (1996). Language accent classification in American English. Speech Communication, 18, 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugnara, F., Falavigna, D., & Omologo, M. (1993). Automatic segmentation and labelling of speech based on Hidden Markov Models. Speech Communication, 12(4), 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childers, D. J. (1978). Modern spectrum analysis (pp. 252–255). New York: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C., & Thorne, S. (2001). Proper Brummie: A dictionary of Birmingham words and phrases. Studley: Brewin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clopper, C. G., Pisoni, D. B., & Jong, K. D. (2005). Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1661–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arcy, S. M., Russell, M. J., Browning, S. R., & Tomlinson, M. J. (2004). The accents of the British Isles (ABI), corpus, MIDL Workshop in Paris (pp. 115–119).

  • Deterding, D. (1997). The formants of monophthong vowels in Standard Southern British English Pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 27, 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esther, G., Brechtje, P., Francis, N., & Kimberley, F. (2000). Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felps, D., Bortfeld, H., & Gutierrez-Osuna, R. (2009). Foreign accent conversion in computer assisted pronunciation training. Speech Communication, 51(10), 920–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitt, S., & Isard, S. (1999). Synthesis of regional English using a keyword lexicon. Eurospeech, 99(2), 823–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, P., & Docherty, G. J. (1999). Urban voices-overview. In P. Foulkes & G. J. Docherty (Eds.), Urban voices (pp. 1–24). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerosa, M., Giuliani, D., & Brugnara, F. (2009). Towards age-independent acoustic modeling. Speech Communication, 51(6), 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorshi, S., Vaseghi, S., & Yan, Q. (2008). Cross-entropic comparison of formants of British, Australian and American English accents. Speech Communication, 50, 564–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, C., Jamieson, D. G., & Dobrovolsky, M. B. (1987). Intonation in English, French and German: Perception and production. Language and Speech, 30, 277–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckvale, M. (2004). ACCDIST: a metric for comparing speakers’ accents. In International conference on spoken language processing, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeno, A., & Hansen, J. H. L. (2007). The effect of listener accent background on accent perception and comprehension. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, Article ID, 76030.

  • Ladefoged, P. (1996). Elements of acoustic phonetics (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged, P. (2000). A course in phonetics (4th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loots, L., & Niesler, T. (2011). Automatic conversion between pronunciations of different English accents. Speech Communication, 53, 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannell, R. (2002). Modelling of the segmental and prosodic aspects of speech intensity in synthetic speech. In Proceedings of the ninth Australian international conference on speech science and technology, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marotta, G., & Barth, M. (2005). Acoustic and sociolinguistic aspects of lenition in Liverpool English. Studi Linguistici e Filologici Online (pp. 377–413).

  • O’Shaughnessy, D. (Ed.) (1987). Speech communication human and machine. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scobbie, J. M., Hewlett, N., & Turk, A. E. (1999). Standard English in Edinburgh and Glasgow: the Scottish vowel length rule revealed. In P. Foulkes & G. J. Docherty (Eds.), Urban voices (pp. 230–245). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, K. S., Fitch, J. L., & Wolf, V. I. (2000). Diphthong changes in style shifting from southern English to standard American English. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33, 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Q., Vaseghi, V., Dimitrios, R., & Ho, C. (2003). Analysis of acoustic correlates of British, Australian and American Accent. In IEEE workshop on automatic speech recognition and understanding (pp. 345–350).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., Sproat, R., Gu, L., Shafran, I., Zhou, H., Su, Y., Jurafsky, D., Starr, R., & Yoon, S. (2005). Accent detection and speech recognition for Shanghai-accented mandarin. In Interspeech 2005—9th European conference on speech communication and technology, Lisbon (pp. 217–220).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dang Cong Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, D.C., Dyke, D., Berryman, F. et al. A new approach to acoustic analysis of two British regional accents—Birmingham and Liverpool accents. Int J Speech Technol 15, 77–85 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-011-9123-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-011-9123-3

Keywords

Navigation