Skip to main content
Log in

An optimized ZA-LMS algorithm for time varying sparse system

  • Published:
International Journal of Speech Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The zero attracting least mean square algorithm has improved performance than conventional LMS when the system is sparse and its performance decreases when the sparsity level is decreased or when the system is time varying. The proposed algorithm focused on optimization of both step size and zero attractor controller using state variable model to improve the overall performance at all sparsity levels. Simulations in the context of time varying sparse system identification proved that the proposed algorithm provides good performance when compared to the conventional ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Benesty, J., & Gay, S. L. (2002). An improved PNLMS algorithm. In 2002 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing (ICASSP) (Vol. 2, pp. II–1881).

  • Benesty, J., Paleologu, C., & Ciochin, S. (2010). Proportionate adaptive filters from a basis pursuit perspective. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 17(12), 985–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breining, C., Dreiscitel, P., Hänsler, E., Mader, A., Nitsch, B., Puder, H., et al. (1999). Acoustic echo control. An application of very-high-order adaptive filters. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 16(4), 42–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Gu, Y., & Hero, III, A. O. (2009). Sparse LMS for system identification. In IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, 2009 (ICASSP 2009) (pp. 3125–3128).

  • Ciochină, S., Paleologu, C., & Benesty, J. (2016). An optimized NLMS algorithm for system identification. Signal Processing, 118, 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciochina, S., Paleologu, C., Benesty, J., Grant, S. L. (2015). An optimized proportionate adaptive algorithm for sparse system identification. In 2015 49th Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers (pp. 1546–1550).

  • Das, B. K., Azpicueta-Ruiz, L. A., Chakraborty, M., & Arenas-Garcia, J. (2014). A comparative study of two popular families of sparsity-aware adaptive filters. In 2014 4th international workshop on cognitive information processing (CIP) (pp. 1–6).

  • Das, B. K., & Chakraborty, M. (2014). Sparse adaptive filtering by an adaptive convex combination of the LMS and the ZA-LMS algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 61(5), 1499–1507.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, H., & Doroslovački, M. (2006). Proportionate adaptive algorithms for network echo cancellation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54(5), 1794–1803.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Duttweiler, D. L. (2000). Proportionate normalized least-mean-squares adaptation in echo cancelers. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 8(5), 508–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui, G., Kumagai, S., Mehbodniya, A., & Adachi, F. (2013). Variable is good: Adaptive sparse channel estimation using VSS-ZA-NLMS algorithm. In WCSP (pp. 1–5).

  • Haykin, S. S. (2008). Adaptive filter theory. New Delhi: Pearson Education India.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kalman, R. E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., & Preisig, J. C. (2007). Estimation of rapidly time-varying sparse channels. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 32(4), 927–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molisch, Andreas F. (2005). Ultra wideband propagation channels-theory, measurement, and modeling. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 54(5), 1528–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paleologu, C., Benesty, J., & Ciochina, S. (2013). Study of the optimal and simplified Kalman filters for echo cancellation. In 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) (pp. 580–584).

  • Radecki, J., Zilic, Z., & Radecka, K. (2000). Echo cancellation in IP networks. In The 2002 45th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS-2002) (Vol. 2, pp. II-219).

  • Sayed, A. H. (2003). Fundamentals of adaptive filtering. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, K., & Shi, P. (2010). Convergence analysis of sparse LMS algorithms with l 1-norm penalty based on white input signal. Signal Processing, 90(12), 3289–3293.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sivashanmugam, R., & Arumugam, S. (2016). Robust adaptive algorithm by an adaptive zero attractor controller of ZA-LMS algorithm. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3945895.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Radhika.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radhika, S., Arumugam, C. An optimized ZA-LMS algorithm for time varying sparse system. Int J Speech Technol 22, 441–447 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-019-09616-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-019-09616-7

Keywords