Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of Deployment in Surveillance Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Published:
International Journal of Wireless Information Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When wireless sensors are used to keep an area under surveillance, a critical issue is the quality of the deployment from the sensing coverage viewpoint. In this paper, we propose several quality measures, which indicate if the deployment provides sufficient coverage, or whether redeployment is required or not. The terrain is modeled as a grid and the placement of the sensors is uniformly distributed. Neyman–Pearson detection is utilized to determine the effects of false-alarm and signal characteristics on the measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Z. Abrams, A. Goel and S. Plotkin, Set k-cover algorithms for energy efficient monitoring in wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Berkeley, USA, pp. 424–432, April 2004

  2. N. Heo and P. K. Varshney, A distributed self spreading algorithm for mobile wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Vol. 3, pp. 1597–1602, March 2003

  3. D. Kazakos P. Papantoni-Kazakos (1990) Detection and Estimation Computer Science Press New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Onur, C. Ersoy, and H. Deliç, Sensing coverage and breach paths in surveillance wireless sensor networks, Sensor Network Operations, S. Phoha, T. F. La Porta, and C. Griffin, eds., IEEE Press, 2005

  5. A. Elfes, Occupancy grids: a stochastic spatial representation for active robot perception, Autonomous Mobile Robots: Perception, Mapping and Navigation, Vol. 1, S. S. Iyengar and A. Elfes, ed., IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 60–70, 1991

  6. T. He, S. Krishnamurthy, J. A. Stankovic, T. Abdelzaher, L. Luo, R. Stoleru, T. Yan, and L. Gu, Energy-efficient surveillance system using wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services, Boston, USA, pp. 270–283, June 2004

  7. T. Clouqueur, V. Phipatanasuphorn, P. Ramanathan, and K. K. Saluja, Sensor deployment strategy for detection of targets traversing a region, Mobile Networks and Applications, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 453–461, August 2003

  8. Y. Zou and K. Chakrabarty, Sensor deployment and target localization based on virtual forces, Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, San Francisco, USA, pp. 1293–1303, March 2003

  9. E. Onur, C. Ersoy, and H. Deliç, How many sensors for an acceptable breach detection probability? Computer Communications in press, 2005

  10. S. Ganeriwal, A. Kansal, and M. B. Srivastava, Self aware actuation for fault repair in sensor networks, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, New Orleans, USA, April 2004

  11. R. M. Haralick L. G. Shapiro (1992) Computer and Robot Vision NumberInSeriesI Addison-Wesley Boston, USA 28–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ertan Onur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Onur, E., Ersoy, C. & Deliç, H. Quality of Deployment in Surveillance Wireless Sensor Networks. Int J Wireless Inf Networks 12, 61–67 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-005-5152-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-005-5152-7

Keywords

Navigation