Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adaptive Coding and Modulation for Multicast Transmission in Packet Radio Networks

  • Published:
International Journal of Wireless Information Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

A low-complexity protocol is described and evaluated for adaptation of the modulation and coding for multicast transmission in half-duplex packet radio networks. The adaptive multicast transmission protocol is designed to compensate for changes in propagation conditions that occur from packet to packet during a session with one sender and multiple receivers. The protocol relies on simple receiver statistics to obtain the control information for adapting the modulation and coding, and it also provides scheduling to avoid collisions among acknowledgments from the receivers. The throughput provided by the protocol is compared with performance results for hypothetical ideal adaptive multicast transmission protocols that are given perfect channel state information. We illustrate the importance of adaptive modulation and channel coding in systems that employ fountain coding for packet erasure correction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Vishwanath and A. Goldsmith, Adaptive turbo-coded modulation for flat-fading channels, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 964–972, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Armanious, D. D. Falconer, and H. Yanikomeroglu, Adaptive modulation, adaptive coding, and power control for fixed cellular broadband wireless systems: Some new insights, Proceedings of the 2003 Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, New Orleans, Vol. 1, pp. 238–242, 2003.

  3. Q. Liu, S. Zhou, and G. B. Giannakis, Cross-layer combining of adaptive modulation and coding with truncated ARQ over wireless links, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 1746–1755, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. M. R. Souryal, B. R. Vojcic, R. L. Pickholtz, Adaptive modulation in ad hoc DS/CDMA packet radio networks, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 714–725, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. B. Pursley and T. C. Royster IV, Low-complexity adaptive transmission for cognitive radios in dynamic spectrum access networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 83–94, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.-Y. Kim and D.-H. Cho, Enhanced adaptive modulation and coding schemes based on multiple channel reportings for wireless multicast systems, Proceedings of the 2005 Vehicular Technology Conference, 2005.

  8. A. Sali, G. Acar, B. Evans, and G. Giambene, A comparison of multicast adaptive techniques in reliable delivery over GEO satellite networks, Proceedings of the 2009 Vehicular Technology Conference, 2009.

  9. G. Caire, G. Taricco, and E. Biglieri, Bit-interleaved coded modulation, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 927–946, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. M. K. Simon, S. M. Hinedi, and W. C. Lindsey, Digital Communication Techniques Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. B. Pursley and T. C. Royster IV, Protocols for adaptation in cognitive radios, Chap. 21 In Cognitive Radio Technology, 2nd ed. B. A. Fette (ed.), pp. 689–721, Elsevier, Burlington 2009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Dolinar and D. Divsalar, Weight distributions for turbo codes using random and nonrandom permutations, JPL TDA Progress Report 42–122, pp. 56–65, 1995.

  13. S. Le Goff, A. Glaviuex, and C. Berrou, Turbo-codes and high spectral efficiency modulation, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 645–649, 1994.

  14. Advanced Hardware Architectures, Inc., Product Specification for AHA4501Astro 36 Mbits/sec Turbo Product Code Encoder/Decoder. http://www.aha.com

  15. H. S. Wang and N. Moayeri, Finite-state Markov channel: A useful model for radio communication channels, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 163–171, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Babich and G. Lombardi, A Markov model for the mobile propagation channel, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2000.

  17. V. Bhaskar, Finite-state Markov model for lognormal, chi-square (central), chi-square (non-central), and K-distributions, International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, Vol. 14, pp. 237–250, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. M. Park and G. U. Hwang, Mathematical modeling of Rayleigh fading channels based on finite state Markov chains, IEEE Communications Letters, Vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 764–766, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. B. Pursley and J. S. Skinner, Adaptive coding for frequency-hop transmission in mobile ad hoc networks with partial-band interference, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 801–811, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. J. C. MacKay, Fountain codes, IEE Proceedings: Communications, Vol. 152, No. 6, pp. 1062–1068, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Luby, LT codes, Proceedings of the 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 271–280, 2002.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Army Research Office under Grant W911NF-11-1-0427, by the Office of Naval Research under Grant N00014-12-1-0060, and by the MIT Lincoln Laboratory. Parts of this article were presented at the 2010 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason D. Ellis.

Appendix

Appendix

For the convenience of the reader, we list in Table 3 the values of endpoints that were adopted in [11] for the interval tests that are applied to the EC and IC. These values are used for the performance results in Sect. 9 The endpoints for the EC interval tests are γ1(EC) and γ2(EC), and those for the IC interval tests γ1(IC) and γ2(IC). The numerical values for the endpoints were chosen to give robust performance with respect to the channel parameters; they are not necessarily optimum for any particular channel. The abbreviations employed for the names of the protocols are summarized in Table 4. In Table 5, we list selected numerical values for the throughput curves of Figs. 3, 5, 6, and 7.

Table 3 Endpoints for the interval tests
Table 4 Summary of abbreviations
Table 5 Throughput for the channels of Figs. 3, 5, 6, and 7

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyd, S.W., Ellis, J.D. & Pursley, M.B. Adaptive Coding and Modulation for Multicast Transmission in Packet Radio Networks. Int J Wireless Inf Networks 20, 103–119 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-013-0201-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-013-0201-0

Keywords