Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of 802.11ah, BLE and 802.15.4 for a Home Automation Use Case

  • Published:
International Journal of Wireless Information Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the main short-range wireless technologies operating in unlicensed bands is an important step before deploying Internet of Things (IoT) applications. In this study, we have selected IEEE 802.11ah, Bluetooth Low Energy and IEEE 802.15.4 for performance comparison in terms of delay, service ratio, traffic loss, activity factor and battery lifetime in a home automation scenario. Also, a low overhead protocol stack suitable for IoT applications is considered. The analysis takes into account heterogeneous devices and different traffic loads. The results show advantages and disadvantages with respect to the different performance indicators with generally satisfactory behavior for the three technologies. Among them, BLE is recognized as the most suitable candidate technology for the home automation domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 3GPP: Cellular system support for ultra low complexity and low throughput internet of things. TR 45.820 v13.1.0 (2014)

  2. Afonso, J., Maio, A., Simoes, R.: Performance Evaluation of Bluetooth Low Energy for High Data Rate Body Area Networks. Wireless Personal Communications 90(1), 121–141 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Badihi, B., Del Carpio, LF., Amin, P., Larmo, A., Lopez, M., Denteneer, D.: Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.11ah Actuators. In: IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Nanjing, China, pp 1–4 (2016)

  4. Badihi, B., et al.: Performance comparison between slotted IEEE 802.15.4 and IEEE 802.11ah in IoT based applications. In: Globecom Workshops, pp. 7–9 (2013)

  5. Bluetooth SIG: Bluetooth Core Specification 4.0 (2010)

  6. Card, S.K., Robertson, G.G., Mackinlay, J.D.: The Information Visualizer, An Information Workspace. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’91, pp. 181–186 (1991)

  7. Del Carpio, LF., Di Marco, P., Skillermark, P., Chirikov, R., Lagergren, K., Amin, P.: Comparison of 802.11ah and BLE for a home automation use case. In: IEEE 27th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC): From M2M Communications to Internet of Things Workshop, pp. 1–5 (2016)

  8. Di Marco, P., Chirikov, R., Amin, P., Militano, F.: Coverage analysis of bluetooth low energy and IEEE 802.11ah for office scenario. In: IEEE 26th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC): Workshop on M2M Communications: Challenges, Solutions and Applications, pp. 1–5 (2015)

  9. Di Marco, P., Fischione, C., Santucci, F., Johansson, K. H.: Modeling IEEE 802.15.4 networks over fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 13(10), 5366–5381 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ericsson: Ericsson Mobility Report (Interim update, Sept.): on the pulse of the networked society (2016). URL https://www.ericsson.com/res/docs/2016/mobility-report/emr-interim-september-2016.pdf

  11. Hazmi, A., et al.: Feasibility study of 802.11ah radio technology for IoT and M2M use cases. In: Globecom Workshops, pp. 3–7 (2012)

  12. IEEE: IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks. IEEE Std 802.15.4-2015 pp. 1–709 (2016)

  13. IEEE: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control and Physical Layer Specification, Amendment 2: Sub 1 GHz License Exempt Operation. P802.11ah, D10.0, Draft Standard (2016)

  14. Narendra, P., Duquennoy, S., Voigt, T.: BLE and IEEE 802.15.4 in the IoT: Evaluation and Interoperability Considerations, pp. 427–438 (2016)

  15. Qutab-ud-din, M., Hazmi, A., Del Carpio, LF., Goekceoglu, A., Badihi, B., Amin, P., Larmo, A., Valkama, M.: Duty Cycle Challenges of IEEE 802.11ah Networks in M2M and IoT Applications. In: European Wireless Conference 2016, pp. 1–7 (2016)

  16. Rico-Alvarino, A., Vajapeyam, M., Xu, H., Wang, X., Blankenship, Y., Bergman, J., Tirronen, T., Yavuz, E.: An overview of 3GPP enhancements on machine to machine communications. IEEE Communications Magazine 54(6), 14–21 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., Bormann, C.: The constrained application protocol (CoAP) (2014)

  18. Tornevik, C., Berg, J., Lotse, F., Madfors, M.: Propagation models, cell planning and channel allocation for indoor applications of cellular systems. In: IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 867–870 (1993)

  19. Trelsmo, P., Di Marco, P., Skillermark, P., Chirikov, R., Östman, J.: Evaluating IPv6 connectivity for IEEE 802.15.4 and Bluetooth Low Energy. In: IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC): Workshop on M2M Communications and the Internet of Things, pp. 1–5 (2017)

  20. Willig, A.: Recent and emerging topics in wireless industrial communications: A selection. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 4(2), 102–124 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the High Impact Initiative: Advanced ConnecTIvity platform for VErtical segments (ACTIVE) project from EIT Digital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Felipe Del Carpio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Del Carpio, L.F., Di Marco, P., Skillermark, P. et al. Comparison of 802.11ah, BLE and 802.15.4 for a Home Automation Use Case. Int J Wireless Inf Networks 24, 243–253 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-017-0355-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-017-0355-2

Keywords

Navigation