Skip to main content
Log in

Realizing the vision for web services: Strategies for dealing with imperfect standards

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizations considering the adoption of the web services framework for their Information Technology (IT) applications are confronted with a period of technological ferment, as standards for supporting non-trivial business process functionality are not yet in place. Evolving standardization poses challenges in the form of inter-temporal dependencies as organizations’ conformance to the standards that emerge in the future is contingent on their current design choices that need to be made ex-ante without complete information of how standards will evolve. At the same time, there are significant early-mover benefits to be gained by executing an IT strategy using web services as a cornerstone. This paper draws upon coordination theory to develop a conceptual framework outlining three approaches for organizations to deal with changing standardization regimes: (a) The dependencies across components, conforming to different standardization regimes, are continually bridged through intermediary services (e.g., using a protocol adapter that translates to an unanticipated emergent standard), (b) The dependencies across components are minimized through loose coupling so that standardization regime changes for any component have a minimal impact on other components (e.g., encapsulating the functionality susceptible to design change into a module with abstract interfaces), and (c) The impacted components are rapidly reconfigurable as and when standardization regime changes (e.g., by building in “extension” features into applications). The risk for organizations investing in web services can be further managed by mechanisms such as organization’s attention to signals from the periphery, undertaking low-risk experiments to learn in different areas, and bricolage-like improvisations of their legacy components at hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, H., Gisolfi, D., Snell, J., & Varadan, R. (2002). Service oriented architecture, web services, and IBM patterns for e-business. IBM DeveloperWorks, http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-best2/.

  • Albornoz, J. (2002). Finding your way through web services standards. IBM DeveloperWorks, http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-stand3.html.

  • Aram, J. D., Lynn, L. H., & Reddy, N. M. (1992). Institutional relationships and technology commercialization: Limitations of market-based policy. Research Policy, 21, 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailetti, A. J., & Callahan, J. R. (1995). Managing consistency between product development and public standards evolution. Research Policy, 24, 913–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (1997). Managing in the age of Modularity. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 84–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolles, G. A. (2003). Technology: Web services, CIO insight, April 1.

  • Bowman, E. H., & Hurry, D. (1993). Strategy through the options lens: An integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Academy of Management Review, 18, 760–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressan, S., Goh, C., Levina, S., Madnick, S., Shah, A., & Siegel, M. (2000). Context knowledge representation and reasoning in the Context Interchange System. Applied Intelligence, 13, 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burner, M. (2003). The deliberate revolution—transforming integration with XML web services? ACM Queue, http://www.acmqueue.org/issue/burner1.cfm?client_no=NEW.

  • Chappell, D. (2002). Opening keynote presentation for the June 2002 XML-web services one conference, San Jose, CA.

  • Chiesa, V., Manzini, R., & Toletti, G. (2002). Standard-setting processes: Evidence from two case studies. R & D Management, 32, 431–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiusano, J. M. (2003).Web services security and more: The global XML web services architecture (GXA), Booz Allen Hamilton Presentation.

  • Curran, K., & Gallagher, B. (2005). The deployment of protocol stack components using web services. International Journal of Web Services Research, 2(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75, 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P., & Greenstein, S. (1990). The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1, 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (2000). Avoiding the pitfalls of emerging technologies. California Management Review, 42, 8–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1986a). Standardization and variety. Economics Letters, 20, 71–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrel, J., & Saloner, G. (1986b). Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product pre-announcements and predation. American Economic Review, 76, 940–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandal, N. (2002). Compatibility, standardization, and network effects: Some policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18, 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner (2002). Will web services standards ever happen?, Gartner Report by M. Pezzini.

  • Garud, R., & Karnoe, P. (2001). Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In R. Garud & P. Karnoe (Eds.), Path dependence and creation (pp. 1–38). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

  • Garud, R., & Kotha, S. (1994). Using the brain as a metaphor to model flexible production systems. Academy of Management Review, 19, 671–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (1994). Coupling the technical and institutional faces of Janus in network industries. In R. Scott & S. Christensen (Eds.), Advances in the institutional analysis of organizations: International and longitudinal studies (pp. 226–242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (1995). Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagel, J. III (2002). Out of the box: Strategies for achieving profits today and growth tomorrow through web services. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, T. (2001). Advancing SOAP interoperability. IBM developer works, http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-asio/.

  • Irani, R. (2001). Versioning of web services—Solving the problem of maintenance, http://www.webservicesarchitect.com/content/articles/irani04.asp.

  • Jang, J., Choi, Y., & Zhao, J. L. (2004). An extensible workflow architecture through web services. International Journal of Web Services Research, 1, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75, 424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobielus, J. (2003). Web services work, but will they scale?. Business Communications Review, 33, 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C. (2003). The battle for web services. CIO, October 1.

  • LaMonica, M. (2003). Microsoft leaves standards group. ZDNet USK News, http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2132448,00.html.

  • Leibowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in and history. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 204–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind (La pensee suavage). London: Weidenfeld and Niolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madnick, S. (1999). Metadata Jones and the Tower of Babel: The challenge of large-scale heterogeneity. Proc. IEEE Meta-Data Conf.

  • Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). Towards an Interdisciplinary Theory of Coordination. Computing Surveys, 26.

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCade, S. R., Olivia, T. A., & Pirsch, J. A. (2002). The organizational adoption of high-technology products for use: Effects of size, preferences, and radicalness of impact. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G. (1997). A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Academy of Management Review, 22, 974–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Microsoft-IBM (2002). Security in a web services world: A proposed architecture and roadmap. A Joint White Paper from IBM Corporation and Microsoft Corporation, Version1.0. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwssecur/html/securitywhitepaper.asp.

  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, S. (2001). Desperately seeking the IT in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12, 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, C. (2003). Waiting for web services. Oracle Magazine, 61, March/April.

  • Reddy, N. M. (1987). Voluntary product standards: Linking technical criteria to marketing decisions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 4, 236–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, K. (2003). Information access waits on ID standards. Loosely Coupled, http://www.looselycoupled.com/stories/2003/access-id1205.html.

  • Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27, 237–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, D. (2002). New glue for age-old gaps. MSI, 20, 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, H. S. (2000). Web Services and the semantic web—Separating hype from reality, University of Edinburgh presentation.

  • Tushman, M. L., & Rosenkopf, L. (1992). Organizational determinants of technological change-toward a sociology of technological evolution. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 311:347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24, 419–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinoski, S. (2004). Multi-middleware web services. XML Journal, 4.

  • Weber, R. (2003). Still desperately seeking the IT artifact. MIS Quarterly, 27, iii–xi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1993). Organization redesign as improvisation. In G. P. Huber & W. H. Glick (Eds.), Organization change and redesign (pp. 347–379). Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, M. J. F., Sharman, G. J., & Wortmann, H. C. (1999). Reconstructing the sales and fulfillment cycle to create supply chain differentiation. International Journal of Logistics Management, 10, 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • W3C (2002). Web services architecture. W3C Working Draft, 14 November http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Gosain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gosain, S. Realizing the vision for web services: Strategies for dealing with imperfect standards. Inf Syst Front 9, 53–67 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-006-9017-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-006-9017-0

Keywords

Navigation