Skip to main content
Log in

Perspectives of citizens towards e-government in Thailand and Indonesia: A multigroup analysis

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thailand and Indonesia are two developing countries still in the early stages of e-government implementation. An understanding of their citizens’ perspectives can help the governments of these countries better plan their services and also provide useful information to governments of other developing countries. The current study uses a new survey instrument to assess the importance of e-government services and website success factors from the perspective of citizens. Using multigroup analysis to validate the instrument, it identifies that an important difference between the perceptions of citizens of the two countries is that in Thailand, the importance of financial transaction services is negatively related to the importance of citizen identification with the e-government site whereas in Indonesia this relationship is insignificant. Only two expected relationships were found to be equivalent across both datasets, i.e., the importance of financial transactions services is positively related to the importance of website efficiency and the importance of local information services is positively related to the importance of citizen identification with the site. The multigroup analysis showed that citizens in both countries interpreted the survey instrument similarly but had very different expectations for their e-government services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in e-government information technology adoption. Decision Support Systems, 22(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, D., Bertot, J. C., & McClure, C. R. (2002). E-government: Initiatives, developments, and issues. Government Information Quarterly, 19(4), 349–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. T. (2002). An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 3(3), 114–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. T. (2006). Data triangulation and web quality metrics: A case study in e-government. Information and Management, 43(6), 767–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. (2005). E-government usability for older adults. Communications of the ACM, 48(2), 102–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkley, B., & Gupta, A. (1994). Improving service quality with information technology. International Journal of Information Management, 14, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R., Pridmore, J., & Byrd, T. (2006). Information systems success in the context of different corporate cultural types: an empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 267–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, A., & Cornett C. (2001). E-Government in California: Providing services to citizens through the Internet, January 24, 2001. Resource document. State of California. Retrieved 2 March 2006 from http://www.lao.ca.gov/2001/012401_egovernment.html.

  • Bretschneider, S., Gant, J., & Ahn, M. (2003). A general model of e-government service adoption: empirical exploration. Proceedings of the Public Management Research Conference, Georgetown Public Policy Institute Washington, DC, October 9–11, 2003.

  • Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDT (2005). E-Government in developing countries. Resource document. Center for Democracy and Technology. Retrieved 10 March 2006 from http://www.cdt.org/egov/descriptions.shtml.

  • Chin, W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudrie, J., & Dwivedi, Y. (2005). The demographics of broadband residential consumers in a British local community: The London borough of Hillingdon. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(4), 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, P. A. (1996). Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmiston, K. (2003). State and local e-government: Prospects and challenges. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 20–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K. & Brown, S. W. (1988). Strategic options for service delivery systems. In C. A. Ingene & G. L. Frazier (Eds.), Proceedings of the AMA Summer Educational Conference.

  • Forman, A. M., & Ven, S. (1991). The depersonalization of retailing: its impact on the lonely consumer. Journal of Retailing, 67(2), 226–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., & Littleboy, L. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4/5), 286–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., & Garino, J. (2000). Get the right mix of bricks and clicks. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 107–114 (May–June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, X., & Lu, J. (2004). Effectiveness of e-government online services in Australia. In W. Hang, K. Siau, & K. K. Wei (Eds.), Electronic government strategies and implementation (pp. 214–241). Hershey: Idea Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. (1995). A case study of a mass information system. Information and Management, 28, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: The SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, L. F., & Ferguson, J. M. (1991). Practical approaches for evaluating the quality dimensions of professional accounting services. Journal of Professional Services, 7(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, J. (2004). How Americans get in touch with government. Resource document. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved 3 March 2006 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_E-Gov_Report_0504.pdf.

  • Hung, S. Y., Ku, C. Y., & Chang, C. M. (2005). E-government applications and user acceptance in Taiwan. Electronic Government Strategies and Implementation, pp. 421–440.

  • Ke, W., & Wei, K. (2004). Successful e-government in Singapore. Communications of the ACM, 47(6), 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, C., & Prybutok, V. (2003). The three ring model and development of an instrument for measuring dimensions of e-government functions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(3), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, A., Maupin, D., Sena, M., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the world wide web. Decision Support Systems, 29(3), 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Z., & Cheung, M. (2002). Internet based e-banking and consumer attitudes: An empirical study. Information and Management, 39(4), 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luling, D. (2001). Taking it online: Anyway, anyplace, anytime…Tennessee anytime. The Journal of Government Financial Management, 50(2), 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuter, M., Ostrom, A., Roundtree, R., & Bitner, M. (2000). Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 50–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, C., & Duval, R. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series no. 07-095. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musso, J., Weare, C., & Hale, M. (2000). Designing web technologies for local governance reform: Good management or good democracy? Political Communication, 17(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D., & Moon, M. (2005). Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare? Public Administration Review, 65(1), 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Cass, A., & Fenech, T. (2003). Web retailing adoption: Exploring the nature of Internet users Web retailing behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10(2), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithami, V., & Berry, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, G., & Marr, N. (1994). Disenchantment discontinuance in the diffusion of technologies in the service industry: A case study in retail banking. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 7(2), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaupp, L. C., & Carter, L. (2005). E-voting: From apathy to adoption. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(5/6), 586–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, P., Fisher, J., & Dawson, L. (2006). E-government services in the local government context: An Australian case study. Business Process Management Journal, 12(1), 88–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M., & Hyse, R. T. (2000). E-satisfaction: An initial examination. Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, W. & Subramaniam, R. (2005). e-Government: implementation policies and best practices from Singapore. Electronic Government Strategies and Implementation, pp. 305–324.

  • Van Riel, A. C. R., Liljander, V., & Jurriens, P. (2001). Exploring consumer evaluations of e-services: A portal site. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(4), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, D. (2000). Assessing e-government: The Internet democracy, and service delivery by state and federal governments. Resource document. Brown University. Retrieved 20 December 2005 from http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Taubman_Center/polreports/egovtrelease00.html.

  • West, D. (2001). State and federal e-government in the United States. Resource document. Brown University. Retrieved 20 December 2005 from http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Taubman_Center/polreports/egovt01us.html.

  • Zhu, F. X., Wymer, W., & Chen, I. (2002). IT-based services and service quality in consumer banking. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(1), 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dinesh A. Mirchandani.

Appendices

Appendix 1

1.1 Commonly cited e-government services

Providing city/state/country information online

Providing geographic information systems data (infrastructure, costs, demographics) online

Providing government budgets online

Providing city/state/country virtual tours online

Providing minutes of government meetings online

Providing video broadcast of government meetings online

Providing audio broadcast of government meetings online

Providing live broadcast from traffic cameras online

Calling for bids or proposals for government contracts online

Accepting bidder applications for government contracts online

Accepting utility (e.g., electricity, gas and telephone) payments online

Collecting fees online

Collecting fines online

Collecting taxes (individual and business) online

Making payments to government service providers online

Managing government procured inventory online

Accepting citizen/constituent requests for service online

Providing citizens/constituents the ability to track complaints online

Providing permit application and renewal online

Providing license application and renewal online

Providing voter registration online

Accepting requests for government records (e.g. birth and death records) online

Accepting property registration online

Accepting reservations for government facilities online

Providing surveys and polls to gauge citizen/constituent sentiments online

Providing forums and discussion groups for citizens/constituents online

Providing citizens/constituents the ability to communicate electronically with officials

Providing e-mail access for government employees

Providing government employees the ability to schedule meetings online

Providing government employees the ability to manage documents online

Providing government employees the ability to video conference

Providing government employees an intranet to exchange information among agencies

Accepting applications for government jobs online

Providing emergency/disaster management documents, policies and procedures online

Providing government owned educational resources online

Appendix 2

2.1 Commonly cited success features for websites

Accessibility of the website (including accessibility to the poor, uneducated and disabled)

Reliability of the services provided

Reliability of the information provided

Ease of use of the information provided

Appropriateness of the format of the information

Appropriateness of the level of detail of the information

Security of data

Confidentiality of data

Timeliness of information

Service and functionality of the website

Quality of content (completeness, relevance and accuracy)

Visual appeal of the website

User friendliness of the website

Ease of navigation of the website

Ease of use of the website

Enjoyability in use of the website

Ability to receive personal services without interacting with human staff

Ability to exert more control over the delivery of service

Ability to receive service how and when the citizen/constituent wants

Savings in cost for the citizen/constituent and the government

Savings in time by obtaining the service electronically

Ability to tailor the delivery of the service more towards the citizen/constituent

Attractiveness of website’s appearance

Sense of personalization created by the website

Sense of community created by the website

Reputation of the website

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirchandani, D.A., Johnson Jr., J.H. & Joshi, K. Perspectives of citizens towards e-government in Thailand and Indonesia: A multigroup analysis. Inf Syst Front 10, 483–497 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9102-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9102-7

Keywords

Navigation