Skip to main content
Log in

Complex service design: A virtual enterprise architecture for logistics service

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an interdisciplinary systems approach to service modeling, design and deployment. The study is based on a longitudinal case study of the development process of a complex logistic service system based on an advanced logistics model. The case examines the development of a Virtual Enterprise Architecture (VEA) for an automatic high-speed transport and sorting system applied in airports for baggage handling. The study traces the evolution of the system from the early conceptual phases to a successful commercial service deployed at Changi, Singapore Airport. The study is conducted using a retrospective analysis of the case using a design science research approach. The paper evaluates and discusses the issues of creating and designing a new complex logistics service, distinct from the physical product, based on an advanced discrete event-based simulation model. The paper concludes by presenting a generalized and validated conceptual framework for a VEA based on an advanced simulation model. The paper thus contributes to the field of service systems and service management by identifying a novel approach to effective design of a new service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alter, S. (2006). The work system method: connecting people, processes, and IT for business results. Larkspur, CA: Work System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreatta, G., Brunetta, L., & Righi, L. (2007). Evaluating terminal management performances using SLAM: the case of Athens International Airport. Computers & Operations Research, 34, 1532–1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assimakopoulos, N., & Dimitriou, N. (2006). A cybernetic framework for viable virtual enterprises: the use of VSM and PSM systemic methodologies. Kybernetes, 35, 653–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AutoSimulations (1998). Module communications module—an extension to the AutoMod product.

  • Barjis, J. (2007). Automatic business process analysis and simulation based on DEMO. Enterprise Information Systems, 1, 365–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. W., & Miller, C. J. (2000). Analysis of the virtual enterprise using distributed supply chain modeling and simulation: an application of e-SCOR. In J. A. Joines, R. R. Barton, K. Kang, & P. A. Fishwick (Ed.), Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Winter Simulation Orlando, FL (pp. 145–162). San Diego, CA: Society for Computer Simulation International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretthauer, K. M. (2004). Service management. Decision Sciences, 35, 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T.-Y., Chen, Y.-M., Chu, H.-C., & Wang, C.-B. (2007). Development of an access control model, system architecture and approaches for resource sharing in virtual enterprise. Computers in Industry, 58, 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Sein, M. K. (2005). Being proactive: where action research meets design research. In Twenty-sixth International Conference on Information Systems. Las Vegas, Nevada: Association of Information Systems.

  • Cook, M. B., Bhamra, T. A., & Lemon, M. (2006). The transfer and application of product service systems: from academia to UK manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1455–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33, 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, R. M., Martinsons, M. G., & Kock, N. (2004). Principles of canonical action research. Information Systems Journal, 14, 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30, 611–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallenborg, K. (2007). Domain of impact for agents collaborating in a baggage handling system. In C. Boukis, A. Pneumatikakis, L. Polymenakos (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and innovations 2007: from theory to applications (pp. 243–250). Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A. R., & March, S. T. (2003). The Information Systems Research Cycle. IT Systems Perspectives, 36, 111–113.

  • Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28, 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, T. (2004). Operations management, 2nd edn. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Kumaran, S., & Chung, J.-Y. (2005). A model-driven framework for enterprise service management. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 3, 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFIP–IFAC Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration (1999). GERAM: generalised enterprise reference architecture and methodology. School of Information and Communication Technology, Nathan (Brisbane) QLD, Australia.

  • Kass-Pedersen, C., Larsen, L. B., & Vesterager, J. (1998). Modelling overview. Globman21, ESPRIT 26509.

  • Klingstam, P., & Gullander, P. (1999). Overview of simulation tools for computer-aided production engineering. Computers in Industry, 38, 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, T., & Thompson, K. (1998). Emulation of a material delivery system, In Proceedings of the AutoSimulations Symposium’98. AutoSimulations.

  • Logistex, F. (2006). Singapore Changi Airport: FKI Logistex case studies series, FKI Logistex.

  • Manzini, E., & Vezzoli, C. (2002). Product-service systems and sustainability: opportunities for sustainable solutions. Paris: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15, 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L., Majchrzak, A., & Gasser, L. (2002). A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly, 26, 179–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morelli, N. (2006). Developing new product service systems (PSS): methodologies and operational tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1495–1501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, C. (2007). Process Innovation Laboratory: a new approach to Business Process Innovation based on Enterprise Information Systems. Enterprise Information Systems, 1, 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, C., & Jørgensen, B. A. (2000). A virtual enterprise architecture based on an advanced simulation model. In K. Mertins, M. Rabe (Ed.), The new simulation in production and logistics—prospects, views and attitudes (pp. 65–74). Berlin, Germany: Fraunhofer-Institut für Produktionsanlagen und Konstruktionstechnik.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (2006) Funding—service enterprise engineering—US National Science Foundation (NSF). vol. 2006, p. http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=13343&org=NSF&from=fund.

  • Nunamaker, J. F., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. D. M. (1991). System development in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, H., & Sackett, P. (1994). The extended manufacturing enterprise paradigm. Management Decision, 32, 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peffers, K., Tunanen, T., Gengler, C. E., Rossi, M., Hui, W., Virtanen, V., & Bragge, J. (2006). The design science research process: a model for producing and presenting information systems research. Design Science Research In Information Systems And Technology, Claremont, CA.

  • Presley, A., Sarkis, J., Barnett, W., & Liles, D. (2001). Engineering the virtual enterprise: an architecture-driven modeling approach. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 13, 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., Nance, R. E., Paul, R. J., Pidd, M., & Taylor, S. J. E. (2004). Simulation model reuse: definitions, benefits and obstacles. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 12, 479–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roher, M. (1998). Vision of emulation. Proceedings in AutoSimulations Symposium’98. AutoSimulations.

  • Schilling, M. (2006). Strategic management of technological innovation (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrage, M. (1999). Serious play: how the world’s best companies simulate to innovate p. 244. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrage, M. (2004). Never go to a client meeting without a prototype. IEEE Software, 21, 42–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tølle, M., & Bernus, P. (2003). Reference models supporting enterprise networks and virtual enterprises. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 2, 2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., & Sawy, O. A. E. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3, 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaishnavi, V., & Kuechler, W. (2004/2005). Design Research in Information Systems, vol. 2005.

  • Venable, J. R. (2006). The role of theory and theorising in design science research. Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, Claremont, California.

  • Vesterager, J., Tølle, M., & Bernus, P. (2003). VERA: Virtual enterprise reference architecture. In Globemen, Vtt symposium 224. Espoo, Finland: VTT Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: design and methods (applied social research methods) (3rd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zang, C., & Fan, Y. (2007). Complex event processing in enterprise information systems based on RFID. Enterprise Information Systems, 1, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research of Sohail Chaudhry was partially funded by the Sabbatical leave from Villanova University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sohail S. Chaudhry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Møller, C., Chaudhry, S.S. & Jørgensen, B. Complex service design: A virtual enterprise architecture for logistics service. Inf Syst Front 10, 503–518 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9106-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9106-3

Keywords

Navigation