Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

An ontological modelling of user requirements for personalised information provision

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The knowledge economy offers opportunity to a broad and diverse community of information systems users to efficiently gain information and know-how for improving qualifications and enhancing productivity in the work place. Such demand will continue and users will frequently require optimised and personalised information content. The advancement of information technology and the wide dissemination of information endorse individual users when constructing new knowledge from their experience in the real-world context. However, a design of personalised information provision is challenging because users’ requirements and information provision specifications are complex in their representation. The existing methods are not able to effectively support this analysis process. This paper presents a mechanism which can holistically facilitate customisation of information provision based on individual users’ goals, level of knowledge and cognitive styles preferences. An ontology model with embedded norms represents the domain knowledge of information provision in a specific context where users’ needs can be articulated and represented in a user profile. These formal requirements can then be transformed onto information provision specifications which are used to discover suitable information content from repositories and pedagogically organise the selected content to meet the users’ needs. The method is provided with adaptability which enables an appropriate response to changes in users’ requirements during the process of acquiring knowledge and skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamsson, P., Warsta, J., Siponen, M. T., & Ronkainen, J. (2003) New directions on agile methods: A comparative analysis. In Proceedings of ICSE’03, pp 244–254.

  • ACM. (1998). Computing classification system. Retrieved January 15, 2007, from www.acm.org/class/.

  • Ambler, S. W. (2004). The object primer: Agile model driven development with UML 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Analyti, A., Theodorakis, M., Spyratos, N., & Constantopoulos, P. (2007). Contextualization as an independent abstraction mechanism for conceptual modelling. Journal of Information Systems, 32(1), 24–60. doi:10.1016/j.is.2005.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, P. S., & William, B. R. (1999). Information systems frontiers in knowledge management. Information Systems Frontiers, 1(3), 205–219. doi:10.1023/A:1010046210832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., & Taylor, R. N. (1978). The impact of cognitive styles on information systems design. MIS Quarterly, 2, 43–54. doi:10.2307/248940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia, user modelling and user adapted interaction. In Kobsa A. (ed.), Ten Year Anniversary Issue 2001, 11(1/2), 87–110.

  • Brusilovsky, P. (2004). KnowledgeTree: A distributed architecture for adaptive E-learning. In Proceedings of the thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference (pp 104–113). New York: ACM.

  • Brusilovsky, P., & Paylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(1), 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, J., Wang, J., Law, K., Zhang, S., & Li, M. (2006). An interactive service customization model. Journal of Information and Software Technology, 48(4), 280–296. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2005.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J. R., & Benjamins, V. R. (1999). Ontologies: What are they? Why do we need them? IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 14(1), 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., Lindvall, M., & Costa, P. (2004). An introduction to agile methods. Advances in Computers, 62, 1–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debevoise, N. T. (2005). Business Process Management with a Business Rules Approach. Business Knowledge Architects.

  • Diaz, O., Paton, N. W., & Iturrioz, J. (1998). Formalizing and validating behavioral models through the event calculus. Information Systems, 23(3/4), 179–196. doi:10.1016/S0306-4379(98)00008-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (1994). Teaching and the quality of learning. CVCP/SRHE.

  • Estes, C. (2004). Promoting student-centred learning in experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(2), 141–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, N. (2005) Teaching and Learning Styles, VARK Strategies. http://www.vark-learn.com

  • Gibson, J. J. (1968). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, D., & Amandi, A. (2006). Modelling User Interests by Conceptual Clustering. Information Systems, 31, 247–265. doi:10.1016/j.is.2005.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Perez, A., Fernandez-Lopez, M., & Corcho, O. (2004). Ontological engineering with examples from the areas of knowledge management, e-commerce and the semantic web. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N. (1995). Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. Journal of Human and Computer Studies, 43(5/6), 625–640. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T. R. (1995). Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5–6), 907–928. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEEE. (2003). Standard for Learning Object Metadata, Learning Technology Standards Committee (LTSC). Retrieved October 31, 2003, from grouper.ieee.org/LTSC/wg12/.

  • Iyoshi, T., Hannafin, M., & Wang, F. (2005). Cognitive tools and student-centred learning: Rethinking tools, functions and applications. Educational Media International, 42(4), 281–296. doi:10.1080/09523980500161346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1923). Psychological types or the psychology of individuation. New York: Brace, Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, C., Fenwick, J., & Chen, J. (1993). Adaptive hypertext navigation based on user goals and context. Journal of User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, 3(3), 193–220. doi:10.1007/BF01257889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. (2000). User modelling for adaptation, user interfaces for all, human factors series (pp 271–294). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

  • Lassila, O., & McGuiness, D. (2001). The role of frame-based representation on the semantic web. Computer and Information Science, 6(5).

  • Liu, K. (2000). Semiotics in information systems engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, K., & Salter, A.(2002). Using Semantic Analysis and Norm Analysis to Model Organisations. In Proceeding of 4th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pp 847–850.

  • McGuinness, D. L. (2003). Ontologies come of age. In D. Fensel, J. Hendler, H. Lieberman, & W. Wahlster (eds.) Spinning the semantic web: Bringing the world wide web to its full potential. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Middleton, S. E., Shadbolt, N. R., & Roure, D. (2004). Ontological user profiling in recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22(1), 54–88. doi:10.1145/963770.963773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R., & Holzinger, A. (2002). Student-centred teaching meets new media: Concept and case study. Educational Technology & Society, 5(4), 160–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers–Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papi, I.E.E.E. (2003) IEEE Public and Private Information (draft 8 specifications). At www.edutool.com/papi/ IMS lip (2003) Learner Information Package Specification (version 1.0). At www.imsglobal.org/profiles/index.cfm.

  • Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centred learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 57–74. doi:10.1007/BF02504526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S., & Williams, D. (2004). A comparison of assessment practices and their effects on learning and motivation in a student-centred learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(3), 283–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razmerita, L., Angehrn, A., & Nabeth, T. (2003). On the role of user models and user modelling in knowledge management systems. Proceedings of HCI International Volume, 2, 450–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riecken, D. (2000). Personalized views of personalisation. Communications of the ACM, 43(8), 26–28. doi:10.1145/345124.345133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamper, R. K. (1997). Organisational semiotics. In J. Mingers, & F. Stowell (Eds.), Information systems: An emerging discipline (pp. 267–283). London: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamper, R. K., Hafkamp, M., & Ades, Y. (2000). Understanding the roles of signs and norms in organizations—a semiotic approach to information systems design and behaviour. Information Technology, 19(1), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., & Liu, K. (2001). A method for interactive articulation of information requirements for strategic decision support. Journal of Information and Software Technology, 43(2), 247–263. doi:10.1016/S0950-5849(00)00164-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., & Ousmanou, K. (2006). Articulation of Information Requirements for Personalised Knowledge Construction. Journal of Requirements Engineering, 11(4), 279–293. doi:10.1007/s00766-006-0031-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trausan-Matu, S., Maraschi, D., & Cerri, S. (2002). Ontology-centred personalised presentation of knowledge extracted from the web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2363, 3–7.

  • Uden, L., & Liu, K. (2001). Linking radical constructivism and semiotics to design a constructivist learning environment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 12(2), 34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, methods, and applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 93–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, D. A. (2005). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc.

  • Zhang, D., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). Powering e-learning in the new millennium: an overview of e-learning and enabling technology. Information Systems Frontiers, 5(2), 207–218. doi:10.1023/A:1022609809036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Informatics Research Centre, School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading, RG6 6AY, Reading, UK

    Lily Sun, Khadidjatou Ousmanou & Matthew Cross

Authors
  1. Lily Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Khadidjatou Ousmanou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew Cross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khadidjatou Ousmanou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, L., Ousmanou, K. & Cross, M. An ontological modelling of user requirements for personalised information provision. Inf Syst Front 12, 337–356 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9144-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9144-x

Keywords