Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying IT sustainability performance drivers: Instrument development and validation

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

IT firms vary in their performance to improve the environmental sustainability of their own operations and in their ability to provide products and solutions that enable and transform the environmental sustainability of other industries. In the parlance of the balanced scorecard, performance has two dimensions, that is, “drivers” and “outcomes”. The drivers, also known as leading performance indicators, refer to learning and innovation, processes, and customer value propositions. The outcomes, also known as lagging performance indicators, refer to financial results. This study has developed and validated an instrument to measure the environmentally sustainable IT performance (eSITP) drivers. We established the nomological network of the eSITP by drawing from several theoretical domains in the areas of innovation antecedents and values, balanced performance measurement and IT and eco-sustainability. Based on a survey of 133 IT firms, we developed and validated a four-dimension, 17 items eSITP instrument covering eco-learning, eco-process, eco-brand and eco-value governance. The instrument is validated by following a seven step rigorous process. The paper breaks new ground from both research and practice perspectives. The instrument makes it easier for other researchers who wish to explain the leading (drivers) and lagging (outcomes) of IT firms’ environmental sustainability and for IT business managers who want to improve their environmental sustainability performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asosheh, A., Nalchigar, S., & Jamporazmey, M. (2010). Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8), 5931–5938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babik, D., & Iyer, L. (2011). Enhancing Sustainability Image: Content Analysis of Letters to Shareholders of IT Companies, paper presented to International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) Shanghai, China, December 4 to 7 2011. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/generaltopics/15. Accessed January 30, 2012.

  • Bhatt, G. D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose, R., & Luo, X. (2011). Integrative framework for assessing firms’ potential to undertake Green IT initiatives via virtualization—A theoretical perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burström von Malmborg, F. (2002). Environmental management systems, communicative action and organizational learning. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 312–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, T. (2011). Compliance with institutional imperatives on environmental sustainability: Building theory on the role of Green IS. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 6–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CFO. (2009). The Next Wave of Green IT: IT’s role in the future of Enterprise Sustainability, CFO Research Services in collaboration with Deloitte Touch Tohmatsu. http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/us_es_NextWaveofGreenIT.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2010.

  • Chand, D., Hachey, G., Hunton, J., Owhoso, V., & Vasudevan, S. (2005). A balanced scorecard based framework for assessing the strategic impacts of ERP systems. Computers in Industry, 56(6), 558–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, A. J. W., Boudreau, M. C., & Watson, R. T. (2008). Information systems and ecological sustainability. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 10(3), 186–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciocci, R., & Pecht, M. (2006). Impact of environmental regulations on green electronics manufacture. MicroElectronics International, 23(2), 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, V., & Molla, A. (2010). Conceptualizing Green IT Organizational Learning (GITOL), Green IT Working Paper Series. http://greenit.bf.rmit.edu.au/Working_Paper/GITWP3_2010.pdf. Accessed November 23, 2010.

  • Corbett, J. (2010). Unearthing the Value of Green IT, ICIS 2010 Proceedings. Paper 198, viewed Jan 2011 <http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/198>.

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 52237.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 14760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, B., Sheridan, C., & Curry, E. (2011). A Capability Maturity Framework for Sustainable Information and Communication Technology. IT Professional, 13(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, S. (2011). Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability: A Resource Base and Framework for IT-Enabled Business Transformation. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35(1), 197–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. J., & Wisner, P. S. (2001). Using a balanced scorecard to implement sustainability. Environmental Quality Management, 11(2), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D., & Winston, A. (2006). Green to gold: how smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, A.M. (2002). Knowledge management metrics via a balanced scorecard methodology paper presented to 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS) Hawaii, USA., January 7–10, 2002. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=994356&tag=1. Accessed July 1, 2012.

  • Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G. B., Seager, T. P., Massard, G., & Nies, L. (2010). Information and Communication Technology for Industrial Symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(5), 740–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 30(3), 611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, R., Demirkan, H., Auseklis, N., & Reinoso, M. (2010). From Green Computing to Sustainable IT: Developing a Sustainable Service Orientation, paper presented to 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, Jan. 5–8, 2010. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5428622. Accessed July 3, 2012.

  • Hart, S. (1997). Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75, 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervani, A. A., Helms, M. M., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(4), 330–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilty, L., Arnfalk, P., Erdmann, L., Goodman, J., Lehmann, M., & Wäger, P. (2006). The relevance of information and communication technologies for environmental sustainability-A prospective simulation study. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21(11), 1618–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ijab, M., Molla, A., Kassahun, A., & Teoh, S. (2010). Seeking the “Green” in “Green IS”: A Spirit, Practice and Impact Perspective. PACIS 2010 Proceedings, Paper 46. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2010/2046.

  • Jenkin, T., Webster, J., & McShane, L. (2011). An agenda for [`]Green’ information technology and systems research. Information and Organization, 21(1), 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January-February (1992), 71–80.

  • Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2001). Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. R., Templeton, G. F., & Byrd, T. A. (2005). A methodology for construct development in MIS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(4), 388–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litwin, M. S. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmodin, J., Moberg, Å., Lundén, D., Finnveden, G., & Lövehagen, N. (2010). Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Operational Electricity Use in the ICT and Entertainment & Media Sectors. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(5), 770–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruster, L., Faber, N. R., & Peters, K. (2008). Sustainable Information Systems: a knowledge perspective. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 10(3), 218–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville, N. (2010). Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 34(1), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milis, K., & Mercken, R. (2004). The use of the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of information and communication technology projects. International Journal of Project Management, 22(2), 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mines, C. (2007). Green Progress in Enterprise IT: Higher Stakes for Tech Marketers As Green IT Principles Spread, Forester Research, Inc. http://www.forrester.com/Green+Progress+In+Enterprise+IT/fulltext/-/E-RES43730. Accessed June 15, 2008.

  • Mithas, S., Khuntia, J., & Roy, P. (2010). Green Information Technology, Energy Efficiency, and Profits: Evidence from an Emerging Economy, paper presented to ICIS 2010, Saint Louis, Missouri, December 12–15, 2010. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/11. Accessed December 28, 2010.

  • Molla, A., Pittayachawan, S., Corbitt, B., & Deng, H. (2009). An International Comparison of Green IT Diffusion. International Journal of e-Business Management, 3(2), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molla, A., Cooper, V., & Pittayachawan, S. (2011). The Green IT Readiness (G-Readiness) of Organizations: An Exploratory Analysis of a Construct and Instrument. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29(1), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, A., & Schaltegger, S. (2005). The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for eco-efficiency analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murugesan, S. (2008). Harnessing green IT: Principles and practices. IT Professional, 10(1), 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishant, R., Teo, T.S.H., & Goh, M. (2011). Do Green IT Announcements Improve Market Value Of Firms, paper presented to Pacific Asian Conference on Information Systems Brisbane, Australia July 7–12, 2011. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2011/142. Accessed July 30, 2011.

  • OFlynn, A. (2009). Approach to Green IT Business at Fujitsu Australia Limited. Fujitsu Scientific and Technical Journal, 45(1), 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E. (2008). Creating an enterprise-level“green” strategy. Journal of Business Strategy, 29(2), 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsato, R. J. (2006). Competitive environmental strategies: when does it pay to be green? California Management Review, 48(2), 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papalexandris, A., Ioannou, G., Prastacos, G., & Eric Soderquist, K. (2005). An integrated methodology for putting the balanced scorecard into action. European Management Journal, 23(2), 214–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipson. (2010). Carbon and Computers in The Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint of ICT Usage in Australia in 2010: A report for the Australian Computer Society. http://www.acs.org.au/attachments/ICFACSV4100412.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2010.

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. & Linde, C. (1995). Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review, September (October), 120–134.

  • Roome, N., & Wijen, F. (2006). Stakeholder power and organizational learning in corporate environmental management. Organization Studies, 27(2), 235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayeed, L., & Gill, S. (2010). An exploratory study on organisational adjustments due to Green IT. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 9(3), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N.H., Erek, K., Kolbe, L.M., & Zarnekow, R. (2009). Towards a procedural model for sustainable information systems management, paper presented to 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, USA, January 5–8, 2009. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4755759. Accessed March 15, 2009.

  • Schmidt, N.H., Schmidtchen, T., Koray, E., Kolbe, L.M., & Zarnekow, R. (2010). Influence of Green IT on Consumers’ Buying Behavior of Personal Computers: Implications from a Conjoint Analysis, paper presented to 18th European Conference on Information Systems, South Africa June 6–9, 2010. http://works.bepress.com/nils-holger_schmidt/4/. Accessed November 7, 2010.

  • Tan, B., Pan, S., & Zuo, M. (2011). Attaining and Enacting Green Leadership: Insights from the Green IT Initiatives of China Mobile, paper presented to International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) Shanghai, China, December 4–7, 2011. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/eastmeetswest/4. Accessed March 15, 2012.

  • The Climate Group. (2008). SMART 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age. http://www.smart2020.org/_assets/files/02_Smart2020Report.pdf. Accessed October 17, 2008.

  • Think Ecological (2009). IT sustainability imperatives in Internet and eCommerce Business. Think Eco-logical © 2009 Rackable Systems, Inc.

  • Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Grembergen, W., & Van Bruggen, R. (1998). Measuring and improving corporate information technology through the balanced scorecard. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 1(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wati, Y., & Koo, C. (2010). The Green IT Practices of Nokia, Samsung, Sony, and Sony Ericsson: Content Analysis Approach, paper presented to 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, USA, 5–10 January, 2010. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5428655. Accessed January 10, 2010.

  • Wati, Y., & Koo, C. (2011). An Introduction to the Green IT Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic IT Management System, paper presented to 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, 4–7, Jan, 2011. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5718554. Accessed January 10, 2011.

  • Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M. C., & Chen, A. J. (2010). Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 34(1), 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherill, M., Rezgui, Y., Boddy, S., & Cooper, G. S. (2007). Intra-and interorganizational knowledge services to promote informed sustainability practices. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 21, 78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business IT and Logistics, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

    Alemayehu Molla

Authors
  1. Alemayehu Molla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alemayehu Molla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molla, A. Identifying IT sustainability performance drivers: Instrument development and validation. Inf Syst Front 15, 705–723 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9415-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9415-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation