Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of object manipulation, customization and social loafing on competencies management in 3D Virtual Worlds

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

3D Virtual Worlds (VW) are rich and promising collaboration tools limitedly introduced to support competence management, yet, extensively used to enhance knowledge sharing (KS) and support knowledge application (KA). Nevertheless, KS and KA represent a challenging medium to leverage individual as well as organization’s competencies. Characterized by a realistic visual dimension in representing work environment and a growing capacity of simulation, 3D platforms facilitate and value competence formation. Present study analyzes role of 3D VW technology unique characteristics (i.e. object manipulation and avatar and 3D environment customization) and specific personal character social loafing, on competencies acquisition. Individual performance and organizational performance were measured to assess individual and organizational competences. Answers from 144 users of 3D VWs were analyzed. Results show that social loafing has significant negative effect on knowledge sharing. Customization and object manipulation have significant, yet small moderating effect on 3D VW technology use and knowledge sharing. KS subsequent effect on KA, individual and organizational competencies are significant. Limitations and new research directions are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanese, A., & Fleet, D. D. (1985). Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free-Riding Tendency. The Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 244–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, M., & Tiwana, A. (2002). Knowledge Integration in Virtual Teams: The Potential Role of KMS. Journal of the American Society and for Information Science and Technology, 12, 1029–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Animesh, A., Pinsonneault, A., Yang, S.-B., & Oh, W. (2011). An Odyssey into Virtual Worlds: Exploring The Impacts of the Technological and Spatial Environments on the Intention to Purchase Virtual Products. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 789–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R., Wise, K., & Bolls, P. (2009). How Avatar Customizability Affects Children’s Arousal and Subjective Presence During Junk Food–Sponsored Online Video Games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(3), 277–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, K., Antuar, N., & Everett, C. (2011). Implementing an employee performance management system in a nonprofit organization. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 21(3), 255–271. doi:10.1002/nml.20024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 779–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, S., & Standing, C. (2001). Effective Knowledge Management: Knowledge, Thinking and the Personal—Corporate Knowledge Nexus Problem. Information Systems Frontiers, 3(2), 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessière, K., Newhagen, J. E., Robinson, J. P., & Shneiderman, B. (2006). A model for computer frustration: The role of instrumental and dispositional factors on incident, session, and post-session frustration and mood,. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 941–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boughzala, I., Vreede, G.-J. D., & Limayem, M. (2012). Team Collaboration in Virtual Worlds: Editorial to the Special Issue. Journal of the Association of Information systems JAIS, 13(Special issue), 714–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis R. E. 1982. The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. Chichester: Wiley. ISBN: 978–0–471-09031-1

  • Burton-Jones, A., & Straub, D. W. J. (2006). Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 228–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cela-Ranilla, J. M., Esteve-Mon, M. F., Esteve-González, V., & Gisbert-Cervera, M. (2014). Developing self-management and teamwork using digital games in 3D simulations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 634–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, S., Srivastava, S. C., & Theng, Y.-L. (2012a). Cognitive Absorption and Trust for Workplace Collaboration in Virtual Worlds: An Information Processing Decision Making Perspective. Journal of the Association of Information systems JAIS, 13(Special issue), 797–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, S., Srivastava, S. C., & Theng, Y. L. (2012b). Cognitive Absorption and Trust for Workplace Collaboration in Virtual Worlds: An Information Processing Decision Making Perspective. Journal of the Association of Information systems JAIS, 13(Special Issue), 797–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., & Yoo, Y. (2010). The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: a field study. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 855–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs,. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What’s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitude about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12(3), 346–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., and Zigurs, I. 2008. Teaching and Learning about Virtual Collaboration: What We Know and Need to Know. In Americas Conference on Information Systems. AMCIS 2008 Proceedings. Paper 168. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2008/168. Accessed on June 7, 2015.

  • Davis, A., Murphy, J., Owens, D., Khazanchi, D., & Zigurs, I. (2009). Avatars, People, and Virtual Worlds: Foundations for Research in Metaverses. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(2), 90–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practice on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., and Valacich, J. S. (2008). "Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity," MIS Quarterly (32:2), pp 575-600.

  • Drucker, P. F. (1989). The New Realities. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducheneaut, N., Wen, M.-H., Yee, N., and Wadley, G., 2009. Body and mind: a study of avatar personalization in three virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM: Boston, MA, USA, pp. 1151–1160

  • Edgar W. B., Lockwood C. A, 2007. Organizational Competencies: A Content Analysis. Working Paper Series—01-07 | January 2007. Last access: August 2015. http://franke.nau.edu/images/uploads/fcb/07-01(1).pdf

  • Edgar, W. B., & Lockwood, C. A. (2011). Understanding, Finding, and Applying Core Competencies: A Framework, Guide, and Description for Corporate Managers and Research Professionals. Academy of Strategic Management, 10(2), 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, W. B. & Lockwood, C. A. 2009. Methodological Tradeoffs in Developing Core Competence Related Theory: The Value Provision Situation. Academy of Strategic Management Journal 9(1), 41–62.

  • Edgar, W. B., & Lockwood, C. (2008). Organizational Competencies: Clarifying the Construct. Journal of Business Inquiry: Research, Education, and Application, 7(1), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschi, K., Lee, R. M., Zanakis, S. H., & Hinds, D. (2009). Engaging Group E-Learning in Virtual Worlds. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 73–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Barriocanal, E., Miguel-Angel Sicilia, M. A., & Sánchez-Alonso, S. (2012). Computing with competencies: Modelling organizational capacities. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 12310–12318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. (1992). Extrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations. Academy of Management Joumal, 35(1), 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. (1995). Asymmetrical effects of rewards and punishments: The case of social loafing. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68, 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, L., Johnson, N. A., Junglas, I., & Ives, B. (2011). From Space to Place: Predicting Users’ Intentions to Return to Virtual Worlds. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 749–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue, D., & Thompson, R. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 265–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., & Ståhle, P. (2005). The coevolution of knowledge and competence management. Int. J. Management Concepts and Philosophy, 1(2), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez, M. B., Crespo R. M., Kloos, C. D. (2010). “Assessment of Knowledge and Competencies in 3D Virtual Worlds: A Proposal” in Reynolds, N.; Turcsányi-Szabó, M. (eds.). Key Competencies in the Knowledge Society: IFIP TC 3 International Conference, KCKS 2010, Held as Part of WCC 2010, Brisbane, Australia, September 20-23, 2010. Proceedings. (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 324). Springer, 165-176.

  • Janz, B. D., Colquitt, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (1997). Knowledge Worker Team Effectiveness: The Role of Autonomy, Inter- dependence, Team Development, and Contextual Support Variables. Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 877–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimoh, A. O., & Danlami, S. A. (2011). Strategic Human Resource Management and Organizational Performance in the Nigerian Manufacturing Sector: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(9), 46–56. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v6n9p46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaasbøll, J. 2006 Structuration theory. Walsham, Geoff: « Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations » Chapter 3 in. Organizational Change: Context and Process. Chichester: Wiley, 1993

  • King, W. A., Fowler, S. W., & Zeithamel, C. P. (2001). Managing organizational competency for competitive advantage: The middle management edge. Academy of Management Executive, 15(2), 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimble C, De Vasconcelos J B and Rocha A. 2016. Competence management in knowledge intensive organizations using consensual knowledge and ontologies. Information Systems Frontiers. doi:10.1007/s10796-016-9627-0.

  • King W. R. (2009). “Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning”. (ed.), Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, 3 Annals of Information Systems 4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_1

  • Klein, E. E., Tellefsen, T., and Herskovitz, P. J. 2007. "The use of group support systems in focus groups: Information technology meets qualitative research," Computers in Human Behavior (23:5), pp 2113–2132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N. (2008). E-Collaboration and E-Commerce In Virtual Worlds: The Potential of Second Life and World of Warcraft. International Journal of e-Collaboration (4:3) July–September 2008, 1–13.

  • Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency- based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19, 699–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. 1979. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (37:6) Jun 1979, pp 822–832.

  • Lawler, E. E. (1994). From job-based to competency-based organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley, T., Ulbrich, A., Scheir, P., Lindstaedt, S., Kump, B., & Albert, D. (2008). Modeling competencies for supporting work-integrated learning in knowledge work. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(6), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A., and Bennett, N. (2004). "Social loafing: A field investigation," Journal of Management (30:2), pp 285-304.

  • Lin, T. C., & Huang, C. C. (2008). Understanding social loafing in knowledge contribution from the perspectives of justice and trust. Expert Systems with Applications., 36(3), 6156–6163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren R., Henfridsson O and Schultze U. 2004, “Design principles for competence management system: A synthesis of an action research study”. MISQuartely 28(3), 435-472.

  • Lindgren, R., & Henfridsson, O. (2002). Using Compe- tence Systems: Adoption Barriers and Design Suggestions. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 1(1), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, R., Stenmark, D., & Ljungberg, J. (2003). Rethinking Competence Systems for Knowledge-Based Organizations. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurey, J. S., & Raisinghani, M. S. (2001). An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information and Management, 38, 523–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., and John, R. 2005. "Perceived Individual Collaboration Know-How Development Through Information Technology–Enabled Contextualization: Evidence from Distributed Teams " Information Systems Research (16:1), pp 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. 1984. Groups Interaction and Performance, (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeen J. D., Zack M. H., Singh, S., 2006 Knowledge Management and Organizational Performance: An Exploratory Survey. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

  • Mulvey, P. W., and Klein, H. J. (1998). “The impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy on group goal processes and group performance,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (74:1), pp 62-87.

  • Nah, F. F.-H., Eschenbrenner, B., and DeWester, D. 2011a. "Enhancing Brand Equity through Flow and Telepresence: A Comaprison of 2D and 3D Virtual Worlds," MIs Quarterly (35:3), pp 731–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nah, F. F.-H., Schiller, S., Mennecke, B. E., Siau, K., and Sattayanuwat, P. 2011b. "Team Collaboration in Virtual Worlds: The Role of Task Complexity," in Americas Conference on Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardon, L., and Aten, K. 2012. "Valuing Virtual Worlds: The Role of Categorization in Technology Assessment," Journal of the Association of Information systems JAIS (13: Special issue), pp 772–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker, J. F., Briggs, R. O., Romano, N. C., & Mittleman, D. (1998). The virtual office work- space: GroupSystems web and case studies. In D. Coleman (Ed.), Groupware: Collaborative Strategies for Corporate LANs and Intranet (pp. 231–253). San Francisco, CA: Pearson higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker, J. F., Romano, N. C., and Briggs, R. O. 2002. "Increasing Intellectual Bandwidth: Generating Value from Intellectual Capital with Information Technology," Group Decision and Negotiation (11:2), pp 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M, Alvarez C., McFarlane A., Gomez F., Carlo S. and Radovic D. 2009. “Technology as small group face-to-face Collaborative Scaffolding”. Computers & Education 52: 147–153

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, D., Davis, A., Murphy, J., Khazanchi, D., and Zigurs, I. 2009. "Real-World Opportunities for Virtual- World Project Management," IT Professional (11:2), pp 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., and Sutton, R. I. 2000. The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge Into Action, (Harvard Business School Press: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resta P., Shonfeld M., 2014. Challenges and Strategies in Designing Trans-National Learning Team Projects in Virtual Worlds Proceeding Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Mar 17, 2014 in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978–1–939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

  • Robinett, W., and Holloway, R. 1992. "Implementation of Flying, Scaling, and Grabbing in Virtual Worlds.," in Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pp. 197–208

  • Ruddle, R. A., Savage, J. C. D., & Jones, D. M. (2002). Symmetric and Asymmetric Action Integration During Cooperative Object Manipulation in Virtual Environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 9, 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, A. (2003). “Experiencing Products in the Virtual World: The Role of Goal and Imagery in Influencing Attitudes Versus Purchase Intentions,”. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 184–198.

  • Schmeil, A., Eppler, M. J., & Freitas, S. d. (2012). A Structured Approach for Designing Collaboration Experiences for Virtual Worlds. Journal of the Association of Information systems JAIS, 13(Special Issue), 836–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih JL, Shih BJ, Shih CC, Su HY, Chuang CW 2010. “The influence of collaboration styles to children’s cognitive performance in digital problem-solving game “William Adventure”: A comparative case study”. Computers & Education 55: 982–993

  • Shiue, Y.-C., Chiu, C.-M., & Chang, C.-C. (2010). Exploring and mitigating social loafing in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 768–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, K.-S., & Lee, Y. E. (2005). "The Effects of Virtual Reality on Consumer Learning: An Empirical Investigation,". MIS Quarterly, 29(4) December 2005, 673–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, K.-S., Kim, H., Suh, E. K. 2011. “What if your avatar looks like you? Dual congruity perspectives for avatar use,” MIS Quarterly (35:3) September 2011, 711-729.

  • Suleiman, J., and Watson, R. T. (2008). “Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (17:4), pp 291-309.

  • Sun, J., & Teng, J. T. C. (2012). Information Systems Use: Construct conceptualization and scale development. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1564–1574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, C.-I. 2010. "Customization, immersion satisfaction, and online gamer loyalty," Computers in Human Behavior (26:6), pp 1547–1554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veigal, J. F. (1991). The frequency of self-limiting behavior in groups: A measure and an exploration,. Human Relations, 44, 877–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., and Windeler, J. B. 2012. "Hype or Help? A Longitudinal Field Study of Virtual World Use for Team Collaboration," Journal of the Association of Information systems JAIS (13: Special issue), pp 735–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M. M., and Faraj, S. 2005. "Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice," MIS Quarterly (29:1), pp 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M., Teigland, R., Leidner, D., and Jarvenpaa, S. 2011. "Stepping into the internet: New ventures in Virtual Worlds," MIS Quarterly (35:3) September 2011, pp 645–652.

  • Won, M., & Pipek, V. (2003). Sharing knowledge on knowledge – the exact peripheral expertise awareness system. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 9(12), 1388–1397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaied, A. H., Hussein, G. H., & Hassan, M. M. (2012). “The Role of Knowledge Management in Enhancing Organizational Performance” International. Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 5, 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed MAKHLOUF.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bououd, I., Skandrani, S.R., Boughzala, I. et al. Impact of object manipulation, customization and social loafing on competencies management in 3D Virtual Worlds . Inf Syst Front 18, 1191–1203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9655-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9655-9

Keywords

Navigation