Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing mobile data services performance via online reviews

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prevalence of portable computational devices like smartphones and tablets has increased the popularity and importance of mobile data services (MDS). However, the flood of new MDS in the market has caused hyper-competition among MDS providers and only a few of them profit. Past studies suggest that online reviews can help MDS providers gain market attention and provide information for improving MDS applications. As a result, MDS providers can leverage reviews to innovate and profit. However, little research has empirically investigated the influences of online reviews on MDS innovation and profitability. This paper studies MDS profitability (popularity) from two angles. We posit that one strategic advantage of certain MDS providers is their ability to rapidly innovate and that innovation inspiration can be derived from reviews ubiquitous in MDS download sites. Our results show that online reviews positively impact MDS popularity directly and indirectly via increasing MDS innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We employed standard OLS regression on popularity in order to test the mediating effect.

References

  • Andreassen, T. W., & Streukens, S. (2009). Service innovation and electronic word-of mouth: Is it worth listening to? Managing Service Quality, 19(3), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aral, S., Dellarocas, C., & Godes, D. (2013). Social media and business transformation: A framework for research. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berge, J. (2012). Bad reviews can boost sales. Here’s why. Harvard Business Review, 90(1), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L., Shankar, V., Parish, J. T., Cadwallader, S., & Dotzel, T. (2006). Creating new markets through service innovation. Sloan Management Review, 47(2), 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland, M. (2000). An introduction to medical statistics, (3rd edition ed.) Oxford medical publications.

  • Boudreau, K. J. (2012). Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1409–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, K., & Lakhani, K. R. (2009). How to manage outside innovation. Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, P. 2010. Apple vs. Google: How the battle between Silicon Valley's superstars will shape the future of mobile computing, BusinessWeek).

  • Cadwallader, S., Jarvis C. B., Bitner, M. J., & Ostrom A. L. (2010). Frontline employee motivation to participate in service innovation implementation. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 38, 219–239.

  • Carbonell, P., Rodriguez-Escudero, A. I., & Pujari, D. (2009). Customer involvement in new service development: An examination of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 536–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W., & Taylor, S. A. (2016). The effectiveness of customer participation in new product development: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N., Lin, J., Hoi, S., Xiao, X., & Zhang, B. (2014). AR-miner: Mining informative reviews for developers from mobile app marketplace, Proceedings of 36 th International Conference on Software Engineering. India: Hyderabad.

  • Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, K. E., Gao, G., & Hitt, L. M. (2006). When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. R., & Joshi, M. P. (2012). Process innovativeness and firm performance in technology service firms: The effects of external and internal contingencies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(3), 401–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vaus, D. (2002). Analyzing social science data: Fifty key problems in data analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Gangi, P. M., & Wasko, M. (2009). Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell ideastorm. Decision Support Systems, 48(1), 303–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). Do online reviews matter? An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 1007–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eloranta, T. (2016). Online review site data on service innovation. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications, 8(4), 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eng, C. (2016). iSIM: An integrated design method for commercializing service innovation. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(3), 457–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, E. (2008). Customer participation and the trade-off between new product innovativeness and speed to market. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 90–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, G. (2013). Gearbox recall in China expected to cost Volkswagen over $600 million, in 4WheelsNews, http://www.4wheelsnews.com/gearbox-recall-in-china-expected-to-cost-volkswagen-over-600-million/.

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner (2010). Market insight: Ten consumer mobile applications to watch in 2012," http://www.gartner.com/resId=1471813.

  • Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004). Using online conversations to study word of mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23(4), 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (2013). For mobile devices, think apps, not ads. Harvard Business Review, 91(2), 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haluk, D., & James, S. (2016). Emerging service orientations and transformations (SOT). Information Systems Frontiers, 18(3), 407–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: The case of mobile data services. Information Systems Research, 17(2), 162–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S., Tam, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2006). Mobile data service fuels the desire for uniqueness. Communications of the ACM, 49(9), 89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S.-J., Thong, J. Y. L., Moon, J. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (2008). Understanding the behavior of mobile data services consumers. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (2011). iPhone & iPad apps marketing. Indianapolis, Indiana: QUE Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDC (2013). Android and iOS combine for 91.1% of the worldwide smartphone OS market in 4Q12 and 87.6% for the year, according to IDC , http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23946013.

  • Kankanhalli, A., Ye, H., & Teo, H. H. (2015). Comparing potential and actual innovators: An empirical study of mobile data services innovation. MIS Quarterly, 39(3), 667–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2009). The integrative framework of technology use: An extension and test. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 513–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B. (2010). An empirical investigation of mobile data service continuance: Incorporating the theory of planned behavior into the expectation-confirmation model. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(10), 7033–7039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B., Choi, M., & Han, I. (2009). User behaviors toward mobile data services: The role of perceived fee and prior experience. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8528–8536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Song, J., & Triche, J. (2015). Toward an integrated framework for innovation in service: A resource-based view and dynamic capabilities approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(3), 533–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, A. (2011). Supplier and customer involvement on new product performance: Contextual factors and an empirical test from manufacturer perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(6), 910–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Shin, B., & Lee, H. G. (2009). Understanding post-adoption usage of mobile data services: The role of supplier-side variables. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(12), 860–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Hitt., L. M. (2008). Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 456–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Hitt, L. M. (2010). Price effects in online product reviews: An analytical model and empirical analysis. MIS Quaterly, 34(4), 809-831

  • Lu, J., Liu, C., Yu, C. S., & Wang, K. (2008). Determinants of accepting wireless mobile data services in China. Information Management, 45(1), 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, P. R., Matthing, J., & Kristensson, P. (2003). Managing user involvement in service innovation. Journal of Service Research, 6(2), 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, J. (2013). Choose your mobile business model wisely. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieval from https://blogs.wsj.com/accelerators/2013/02/28/choose-your-mobile-business-model-wisely/.

  • Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. Y. (2006). Ubiquitous email: Individual experiences and organizational consequences of BlackBerry use, best paper proceedings of Academy of. Altanta: Management.

  • Menor, L. J., & Roth, A. V. (2007). New service development competence in retail banking: Construct development and measurement validation. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 825–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Service innovation viewed through a service dominant logic lens: A conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piezunka, H., & Dahlander, L. (2015). Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations' filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 856–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riasanow, T., Ye, H., & Goswami, S. (2015). Generating trust in online consumer reviews through signaling: An experimental study. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 48, 3307–3316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, D., and Cheshire, T. (2009). The app explosion, in Wired, http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2010/02/features/the-app-explosion/viewgallery/260135.

  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92, 434–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statista, (2016). Worldwide mobile app revenues 2015–2020, http://www.statista.com/statistics/269025/worldwide-mobile-app-revenue-forecast/.

  • Viswanathan, P. (2013). 2013 mobile devices readers’ choice awards winners, http://mobiledevices.about.com/od/RCA-2013/ss/2013-Mobile-Devices-Readers-Choice-Awards-Winners_12.htm.

  • Yang, X., Wang, J., & Chau, M. (2015). Customer revisit intention to restaurants: Evidence from online reviews. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(3), 645–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, H., & Kankanhalli, A. (2015). Investigating the antecedents of organizational task crowdsourcing. Information Management, 52(1), 98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, H., & Kankanhalli, A. (2017). User service innovation on mobile phone platforms: Investigating impacts of lead userness, toolkit support, and design autonomy, MIS Quarterly, forthcoming.

  • Ye, H., Kankanhalli, A., Goh, K. Y., & Sun, J. (2011). Investigating value co-creation in innovation of it-enabled services: An empirical study of mobile data services, International Conference on Information Systems. Shanghai, China: AIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, H., Blohm, I., Bretschneider, U., Goswami, S., Leimeister, J., & Krcmar, H. (2016). Promoting the quality of user generated ideas in online innovation communities: A knowledge collaboration perspective, International Conference on Information Systems. Ireland: Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua (Jonathan) Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, H.(., Chua, C.E.H. & Sun, J. Enhancing mobile data services performance via online reviews. Inf Syst Front 21, 441–452 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9763-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9763-1

Keywords

Navigation