Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Social Roles and Consequences in Using Social Media in Disasters: a Structurational Perspective

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disaster management officials, as well as the general public, are increasingly using social media to communicate. Such usage has resulted in new and emergent social consequences for disaster management and has reformed the roles of its relevant stakeholders. However, the existing literature on social media use in disasters is still preliminary and incomplete, and does not capture the change in social roles that stakeholders have taken and the consequences of the actions that people take in using social media. In this paper, by using Structuration theory as a meta-theory and by analysing the posts and comments in three officials’ Facebook fan pages in three different disasters, we theorize the social structures (i.e., social roles and social consequences) and the human actions taken by both the public and the disaster management officials during disasters. Furthermore, we explain how the social structures emerge out of the human actions involved, and how the social structures further shape those actions. Our research provides theoretical and practical insights into how the usage of social media in disasters benefits disaster management and reinforces the roles of the different stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. When we report the findings in the following section, we report both the name automatically generated by Leximancer and the name of the human actions we re-named in the manual coding phase.

References

  • ABC News (2014). Perth hills bushfire: residents frustrated by lack of information from authorities. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-01-13/perth-hills-residents-anxiously-wait-to-return-to-homes/5197458. Accessed 14 Apr 2014.

  • Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108.

  • Bruns, A., Burgess, J. E., Crawford, K., & Shaw, F. (2012). # qldfloods and@ QPSMedia: Crisis communication on twitter in the 2011 south east Queensland floods, (Vol. 2012). Brisbane: ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and innovation.

  • Bunker, D., Levine, L., & Woody, C. (2015). Repertoires of collaboration for common operating pictures of disasters and extreme events. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callero, P. L. (1994). From role-playing to role-using: Understanding role as resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 228–243.

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandola, T., Marmot, M., & Siegrist, J. (2007). Failed reciprocity in close social relationships and health: findings from the Whitehall II study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 63(4), 403–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, M., & Lee, V. C. (2011). A microblogging-based approach to terrorism informatics: exploration and chronicling civilian sentiment and response to terrorism events via twitter. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(1), 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council, N. S. a. T. (2005). Grand challenges for disaster reduction: a report of the subcommittee on disaster reduction. Washington, D.C.: National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cretchley, J., Rooney, D., & Gallois, C. (2010). Mapping a 40-year history with Leximancer: themes and concepts in the journal of cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(3), 318–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crofts, K., & Bisman, J. (2010). Interrogating accountability: an illustration of the use of Leximancer software for qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7(2), 180–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Albuquerque, J. P., Herfort, B., Brenning, A., & Zipf, A. (2015). A geographic approach for combining social media and authoritative data towards identifying useful information for disaster management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(4), 667–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSanto, B. J. (2013). Uses and gratifications theory. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of public relations (pp. 880–882). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devadoss, P. R., Pan, S. L., & Huang, J. C. (2002). Structurational analysis of e-government initiatives: a case study of SCO. Decision Support Systems, 34(3), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkers, M. P., Whiteneck, G., & El-Jaroudi, R. (2000). Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, S63–S80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraustino, J. D., Liu, B., & Jin, Y. (2012). Social media use during disasters: a review of the knowledge base and gaps. http://www.start.umd.edu/start/publications/START_SocialMediaUseduringDisasters_LitReview.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2015.

  • Furumo, K., & Melcher, A. (2006). The importance of social structure in implementing ERP systems: a case study using adaptive structuration theory. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 8(2), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Given, L. M. (2008). The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horita, F. E. & de Albuquerque, J. P. (2013). An approach to support decision-making in disaster management based on volunteer geographic information (VGI) and spatial decision support systems (SDSS). In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Baden-Baden, Germany, 12–15 May 2013 (Vol. 1215).

  • Hughes, A. L., & Palen, L. (2009). Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. International Journal of Emergency Management, 6(3–4), 248–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaewkitipong, L., Chen, C., & Ractham, P. (2012). Lessons learned from the use of social media in combating a crisis: a case study of 2011 Thailand flooding disaster. In proceedings of ICIS 2012. Orlando, Florida, USA. 16-19 December 2012.

  • Kaewkitipong, L., Chen, C. C., & Ractham, P. (2016). A community-based approach to sharing knowledge before, during, and after crisis events: a case study from Thailand. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 653–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiarie, J., Eising, W., Mundara, R., & Muricho, A. (2010). Local authorities performance: lessons learned for M&E and reporting of projects. In T. Barasa & W. Eising (Eds.), Reforming Local Authorities for Better Service Delivery in Developing Countries (pp. 135–212). Nairobi: Published by the Institute of Policy Analysis and Research.

  • Kryvasheyeu, Y., Chen, H., Obradovich, N., Moro, E., Van Hentenryck, P., Fowler, J., et al. (2016). Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity. Science Advances, 2(3), e1500779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leximancer (2011). Leximancer manual version 4. http://static1.squarespace.com/static/539bebd7e4b045b6dc97e4f7/t/53c33e0fe4b056735b9b4683/1405304335237/LeximancerþManualþVersionþ4.pdf.

  • Lindsay, B. R. (2010). Social media and disasters: current uses, future options, and policy considerations. Journal of Current Issues in Media & Telecommunications, 2(4), 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, C. L. M., Pan, S. L., Ractham, P., & Kaewkitipong, L. (2015). ICT-enabled community empowerment in crisis response: social media in Thailand flooding 2011. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(3), 174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. J., & Rice, J. L. (2007). Profiling enterprise risks in large computer companies using the Leximancer software tool. Risk Management, 9(3), 188–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, B., & Rooney, D. (2012). Making sense of irrealis in the global financial crisis. Culture and Organization, 18(2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J., Moergeli, H., & Maercker, A. (2008). Disclosure and social acknowledgement as predictors of recovery from posttraumatic stress: a longitudinal study in crime victims. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(3), 160–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M. (2014). 52 tips for social media disaster management #comms #smem. http://www.commsgodigital.com.au/2014/11/52-tips-social-media-disaster-management-comms-smem/. Accessed 8 Oct 2016.

  • Nan, N., & Lu, Y. (2014). Harnessing the power of self-organization in an online community during organizational crisis. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1135–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, O., Agrawal, M., & Rao, H. R. (2011). Information control and terrorism: tracking the Mumbai terrorist attack through twitter. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, O., Agrawal, M., & Rao, H. R. (2013). Community intelligence and social media services: a rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Robey, D. (1991). Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Information Systems Research, 2(2), 143–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostermann, F., & Spinsanti, L. (2012). Context analysis of volunteered geographic information from social media networks to support disaster management: a case study on forest fires. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (IJISCRAM), 4(4), 16–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palen, L., Vieweg, S., & Anderson, K. M. (2010). Supporting “everyday analysts” in safety-and time-critical situations. The Information Society, 27(1), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palen, L., Vieweg, S., Liu, S. B., & Hughes, A. L. (2009). Crisis in a networked world features of computer-mediated communication in the April 16, 2007, Virginia tech event. Social Science Computer Review, 27(4), 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, S. L., Pan, G., & Leidner, D. (2012). Crisis response information networks. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, I., Sharman, R., & Rao, H. R. (2015). Disaster experience and hospital information systems: an examination of perceived information assurance, risk, resilience, and his usefulness. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 317–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, A. (2016). Belgian officials urge people to use social media in wake of bombings. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/03/22/belgian-officials-urge-people-to-turn-to-social-media-in-wake-of-bombings/?utm_term=.88a73c1ebbe1. Accessed 11 Nov 2016.

  • Pfeffer, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations (Vol. 33). Marshfield: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puron-Cid, G. (2013). Interdisciplinary application of structuration theory for e-government: a case study of an IT-enabled budget reform. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S46–S58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, Y., P.F. Wu, & X. Wang. (2009). Online Community Response to Major Disaster: A Study of Tianya Forum in the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake. In Proc. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2009, Hawaii, USA, 05–08 January 2009 (pp. 1–11).

  • Rose, J. (1998) Evaluating the contribution of structuration theory to the information systems discipline. In 6th European Conference on Information Systems, (pp. 910–924).

  • Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2013). Theorizing crisis communication. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklovski, I., Palen, L., & Sutton, J. (2008) Finding community through information and communication technology in disaster response. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, San Diego, 8–12 November 2008 (pp. 127–136), ACM.

  • Smith, A. E., & Humphreys, M. S. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 262–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (2001). Research methods in industrial and organizational psychology: data collection and data analysis with special consideration to international issues. Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, 1, 10–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbird, K., Palen, L., Hughes, A. L., & Vieweg, S. (2010) Chatter on the red: what hazards threat reveals about the social life of microblogged information. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Savannah, Georgia, 6–10 February 2010, (pp. 241–250), ACM.

  • Sutton, J., Palen, L., & Shklovski, I. (2008) Backchannels on the front lines: emergent uses of social media in the 2007 southern California wildfires. In Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference, Washington, (pp. 624–632).

  • Tim, Y., Pan, S. L., Ractham, P., & Kaewkitipong, L. (2016). Digitally enabled disaster response: the emergence of social media as boundary objects in a flooding disaster. Information Systems Journal, 27(2), 197–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veil, S. R., Buehner, T., & Palenchar, M. J. (2011). A work-in-process literature review: incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 19(2), 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieweg, S., Hughes, A. L., Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2010). Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, 10–15 April 2010 (pp. 1079–1088), ACM.

  • Vieweg, S., Palen, L., Liu, S. B., Hughes, A. L., & Sutton, J. (2008) Collective intelligence in disaster: An examination of the phenomenon in the aftermath of the 2007 Virginia Tech shootings. In Proceedings of the 2008 information systems for crisis response and management conference (ISCRAM), Washington.

  • Vyas, D., Chisalita, C. M., & Dix, A. (2016). Organizational affordances: a structuration theory approach to affordances. Interacting with Computers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting information systems in organizations. Chichester and New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G., & Han, C. K. (1993). Information systems strategy formation and implementation: the case of a central government agency. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 3(3), 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, J., Lampert, A., Cameron, M., Robinson, B., & Power, R. (2012). Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(6), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaitseva, E., Milsom, C., & Stewart, M. (2013). Connecting the dots: using concept maps for interpreting student satisfaction. Quality in Higher Education, 19(2), 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr., J. F. (2002). A knowledge management framework for the support of decision making in humanitarian assistance/disaster relief. Knowledge and Information Systems, 4(3), 370–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Fang Liu & Dongming Xu

Authors
  1. Fang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dongming Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongming Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, F., Xu, D. Social Roles and Consequences in Using Social Media in Disasters: a Structurational Perspective. Inf Syst Front 20, 693–711 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9787-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9787-6

Keywords