Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Productivity Vampires

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The four decade old Productivity Puzzler (sometimes called the Productivity Paradox) asks why the massive investment in information technology (IT) is not accompanied by equally massive productivity improvements. The belief that IT does improve productivity is foiled by faulty measurement, but improved measurement will, at some point, demonstrate conclusively that IT improves productivity. Another view is that “Productivity Vampires” use IT to suck productivity out of organizations through mechanisms such as moving the goalposts, making things not forbidden required, and increasing cognitive load on workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It was called the Productivity Paradox, but paradoxes are absurd, self-contradictory or counter-intuitive propositions that, if capable of being proved true, might be “apparent paradoxes.” The Productivity Puzzler might be the Productivity Apparent Paradox.

  2. The concept of IT and the “undead” has been explored before (Su et al. 2018)

  3. An instrumental IT user is one who uses IT to get work done when that work is not fundamentally about IT. See Kling (1978).

  4. We live here, too, and are unlike “[T]he idiot who praises, with enthusiastic tone, all centuries but this, and every country but his own…” (Gilbert and Sullivan 1885, Act 1)

References

  • Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes. In Spence, K.W. and Spence, J.T. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balderston, L. R. (1919). Housewifery: A Manual and Text Book of Practical Housekeeping. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. (2019). The Computerization Time Crunch. IEEE Computer, 52, 67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst, J. (1919). Home and Community Hygiene: A Text-Book of Personal and Public Health. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E. D. Rock and C. Syverson (2019). In Agrawal, A., J. Gans, A. Goldfarb. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. Chicago University of Chicago Press, pp 23–58.

  • Cowan, R. S. (1983). More Work for Mother: The Ironies Of Household Technology From The Open Hearth To The Microwave. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1980). Actors and Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A. (1990). The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox. The American Economic Review, 80(2), 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayagi, M., Ziv, A., & Reis, S. (2009). Primary care physicians’ use of an electronic medical record system: a cognitive task analysis. Journal of general internal medicine, 24(3), 341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, T. (2010). Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(6), 725–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M, (2015). The US underestimates growth, Wall St Journal, May 18. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-u-s-underestimates-growth-1431989720. Accessed 30 June 2019.

  • Gordon, R. (2016). The Rise and Fall of American Growth, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Gilbert, W. and A. Sullivan (1885) The Mikado.

  • Gordon, J., Zhao, S. and Gretton, P. (2015) What is productivity and how is it measured? Australia Productivity Commission Staff Research Note, February 2015 https://www.pc.gov.au/news-media/pc-news/previous-editions/pc-news-may-2015/productivity-and-how-measured Accessed 30 June 2019.

  • Hammer, M., Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. Business Horizons, 36(5), 90–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IHMP. (2019). The Integrative Human Microbiome Project. Nature, 569, 641–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janeway, W. (2018). Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, J. L. (1995). Where are the payoffs from computerization? Technology, learning, and organizational change. In R. Kling (Ed.), Computerization and controversy (2nd ed.) (pp. 239–260). Orlando: Academic Press, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R. (1978). The social dynamics of instrumental computer use. ACM SIGSOC Bulletin, 10(1), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M and Singh, J.B. (2016) Examining Technology Resistance: Cognitive Load Perspective. Twenty Second Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Diego. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bb91/8b66cd8533f84db51ea2d4cd3cdcdf42c277.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2019.

  • McKinsey Global Institute (2017) A Future that Works: Automation, Employment and Productivity, January.

  • Nye, D. (1996). American Technological Sublime. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribes, D., & Finholt, T. A. (2009). The Long Now of Technology Infrastructure: Articulating Tensions in Development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5) Article 5.

  • Roach, S. S. (1984). Productivity, investment, and the information economy. Economic Perspectives. New York: Morgan Stanley and Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, S. S. (1989). The case of the missing technology payback. Economic Perspectives. New York: Morgan Stanley and Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., & Simone, C. (1996). Coordination Mechanisms: Towards a Conceptual Foundation of CSCW Systems Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 155–200.

  • Scott, J. C. (2017). Against the grain: a deep history of the earliest states. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, H. P. (1985). Technological Utopianism in American Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehested, T. (2018) Creating A Culture Of Compliance: Why All Successful Businesses Must Do This And Where To Begin. Forbes Blog, September 17, 2018. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/09/17/creating-a-culture-of-compliance-why-all-successful-businesses-must-do-this-and-where-to-begin/#54aa74f15050. Accessed 30 June 2019.

  • Slayton, R. (2017). Why cyber operations do not always favor the offense. Policy brief: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. Cambridge: Harvard University. https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/why-cyber-operations-do-not-always-favor-offense. Accessed 30 June 2019.

  • Solow, R. (1987). We'd Better Watch Out. New York Times Book Review, 12, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, D. P. (1989). Hay fever, hygiene, and household size. British Medical Journal, 229(6710), 1259–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, N., King, J. L., & Grudin, J. (2018). Staying Alive: The IS Field at the Half-Century Mark. In R. D. Galliers & M. K. Stein (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems (pp. 490–504). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Merrienboer, J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. H. (1958). The Once and Future King. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Leslie King.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

King, J.L., Ehrenberg, A.J. The Productivity Vampires. Inf Syst Front 22, 11–15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09943-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09943-9

Keywords

Navigation