Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of Sentiment Tendency in Affecting Review Helpfulness for Durable Products: Nonlinearity and Complementarity

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The online review has become an important pillar in the decision-making process for purchasing experience products, especially durable goods with relatively high prices. Using a rich data set for automobiles, we quantify the sentiment tendency expressed in textual reviews, and empirically examine the nonlinearly inverted U-shaped relationship between customer satisfaction and sentiment tendency. We then investigate the nonlinear influences of review sentiment and depth on helpfulness. Furthermore, we study the relationship between numerical rating and text contents, i.e., sentiment tendency and review depth, in promoting the review helpfulness, and quantitatively identify the complementary effect of sentiment tendency. Our results indicate that both numerical ratings and sentiments expressed in text contents contribute to an increase in review helpfulness. Compared with polarized reviews, the neutral ones better benefit helpfulness and customer satisfaction. We also find that reviews with moderate depth are more helpful. Based on the empirical findings, we discuss several managerial implications for review system designers and consumers in the durable product market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghakhani, N., Oh, O., Gregg, D. G., & Karimi, J. (2021). Online review consistency matters: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 23, 1287–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S. N., & Laroche, M. (2017). Analyzing electronic word of mouth: A social commerce construct. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 202–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelis, M. D., Bonezzi, A., Peluso, A. M., Rucker, D. D., & Costabile, M. (2012). On braggarts and gossips: A self-enhancement account of word-of-mouth generation and transmission. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(4), 551–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, H., Ahn, J., & Choi, Y. (2012). Helpfulness of online consumer reviews: Readers’ objectives and review cues. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(2), 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, H., Lee, S., Oh, S., & Ahn, J. (2015). Normative social influence and online review helpfulness: Polynomial modeling and response surface analysis. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 16(4), 290–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J. B. (2001). Response styles in marketing research: Across-national investigation. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belzer, J. (1973). Information theory as a measure of information content. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 300–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickart, B., & Schindler, R. M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanca, H. O. (2020). What about “U”? The influence of positive on-line consumer reviews on the individual’s perception of consumption benefits. Online Information Review, 44(4), 863–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Q., Duan, W., & Gan, Q. (2011). Exploring determinants of voting for the “helpfulness” of online user reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaovalit, P., & Zhou, L. (2005). Movie review mining: A comparison between supervised and unsupervised classification approaches. In the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.

  • Charash, M., & Mckay, D. (2002). Attention bias for disgust. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 16, 529–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews: Do consumers use them? Advances in Consumer Research, 28, 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Wang, Q., & Xie, J. (2011). Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(2), 238–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, J. S., Hsiao, C. C., & Chiu, T. Y. (2018). The credibility and attribution of online reviews: Differences between high and low product knowledge consumers. Online Information Review, 42(5), 630–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, A. Y. K., & Banerjee, S. (2016). Helpfulness of user-generated reviews as a function of review sentiment, product type and information quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 547–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E. K., Gao, G., & Hitt, L. M. (2006). When online reviews meet hyper differentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, W., Cao, Q., & Gan, Q. (2011). Investigating determinants of voting for the “helpfulness” of online consumer reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems, 50(02), 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engler, T. H., Winter, P., & Schulz, M. (2015). Understanding online product ratings: A customer satisfaction model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 27, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eslami, S. P., Ghasemaghaei, M., & Hassanein, K. (2018). Which online reviews do consumers find most helpful? A multi-method investigation. Decision Support Systems, 113, 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filieri, R., McLeay, F., Tsui, B., & Lin, Z. (2018a). Consumer perceptions of information helpfulness and determinants of purchase intention in online consumer reviews of services. Information & Management, 55(8), 956–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filieri, R., Raguseo, E., & Vitari, C. (2018b). When are extreme ratings more helpful? Empirical evidence on the moderating effects of review characteristics and product type. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 134–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (2021). Microeconomics and Behavior (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geetha, M., Singha, P., & Sinha, S. (2017). Relationship between customer sentiment and online customer ratings for hotels - an empirical analysis. Tourism Management, 61, 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(10), 1498–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R. E., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., & Carroll, J. D. (1978). Analyzing Multivariate Data (pp. 135–136). Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, H., & Back, K. J. (2006). Investigating the effects of consumption emotions on customer satisfaction and repeat visit intentions in the lodging industry. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 15(3), 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, H., & Back, K. J. (2007). Assessing customers’ emotional experiences influencing their satisfaction in the lodging industry. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 23(1), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L., Tan, C. H., Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. (2014). Do we order product review information display? How? Information & Management, 51(7), 883–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, P., Lurie, N. H., & Mitra, S. (2009). Searching for experience on the web: An empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose, R. S., Nathalie, G. P., Horst, E., & Molina, G. (2019). Spreading the word: How customer experience in a traditional retail setting influences consumer traditional and electronic word-of-mouth intention. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 37, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyzer, F., Dens, N., & De, P. P. (2017). Don’t be so emotional! How tone of voice and service type affect the relationship between message valence and consumer responses to WOM in social media. Online Information Review, 41(7), 905–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. W., Kankanhalli, A., & Lee, H. L. (2016). Investigating decision factors in mobile application purchase: A mixed-methods approach. Information & Management, 53(6), 727–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korfiatis, N., Garcfa-Bariocanal, E., & Sanchez-Alonso, S. (2012). Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(03), 05–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., & Benbasat, I. (2006). The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Lee, S., & Baek, H. (2021). Does the dispersion of online review ratings affect review helpfulness? Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. T., Phamb, T. T., & Chuangb, H. C. (2019a). Do reviewers’ words affect predicting their helpfulness ratings? Locating helpful reviewers by linguistics styles. Information & Management, 56(1), 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Wu, C., & Mai, F. (2019b). The effect of online reviews on product sales: A joint sentiment-topic analysis. Information & Management, 56(2), 172–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Zeng, D. D., Xu, D. J., Liu, R., & Yao, R. (2020). Understanding and predicting users’ rating behavior: A cognitive perspective. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 32(4), 996–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z., Zhang, Y., & Tan, Y. (2019). An empirical study of free product sampling and rating bias. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 260–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. (2010). Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. Handbook of Natural Language Processing, 2, 627–666.

  • Liu, D., & Bagh, A. (2020). Preserving bidder privacy in assignment auctions: Design and measurement. Management Science, 66(7), 3162–3182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F. M. (2002). The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and dis-confirmation approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S., Bergey, P. K., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Dynamic effects among movie ratings, movie revenues, and viewer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavizadeh, M., Koohikamali, M., Salehan, M., & Kim, D. J. (2020). An investigation of peripheral and central cues of online customer review voting and helpfulness through the lens of elaboration likelihood model. Information Systems Frontiers, forthcoming.

  • Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(01), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. (2020). Local consumer review survey. https://www.brightlocal.com/research/local-consumer-review-survey/. Accessed Jan 2020.

  • Ngo-Ye, T. L., & Sinha, A. P. (2014). The influence of reviewer engagement characteristics on online review helpfulness: A text regression model. Decision Support Systems, 61, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., & Zhang, J. (2011). Born unequal: A study of the helpfulness of user generated product reviews. Journal of Retailing, 87(04), 598–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2, 1–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, D., & Lee, J. (2008). eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 386–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, D. L., Hu, Z. G., Liu, H. Y., Liu, C. H., & Ding, G. S. (2006). Neuro-cognitive mechanisms underlying the emotional modulation of word reading. Chinese Science Bulletin, 51, 377–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2018). Microeconomics (9th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

  • Racherla, P., & Friske, W. (2012). Perceived ‘usefulness’ of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 548–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, G., & Hong, T. (2019). Examining the relationship between specific negative e-motions and the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. Information Processing & Management, 56, 1425–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salehan, M., & Kim, D. J. (2015). Predicting the performance of online consumer reviews: A sentiment mining approach to big data analytics. Decision Support Systems, 81(C), 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, R. M., & Bickart, B. (2012). Perceived helpfulness of online consumer reviews: The role of message content and style. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 11(03), 234–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simona, B., Michelangelo, M., & Germana, S. (2018). Combining different evaluation systems on social media for measuring user satisfaction. Information Processing & Management, 54(4), 674–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. P., Irani, S., & Rana, N. P. (2017). Predicting the “helpfulness” of online consumer reviews. Journal of Business Research, 70, 346–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. K., & Bolton, R. N. (2002). The effect of customers’ emotional responses to service failures on their recovery effort evaluations and satisfaction judgments. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2008). Factors influencing word of mouth effectiveness: Receiver perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 42(34), 344–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, D., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2015). Document modeling with gated recurrent neural network for sentiment classification. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1422–1432.

  • Wang, W., & Benbasat, I. (2009). Interactive decision aids for consumer decision making in ecommerce: The influence of perceived strategy restrictiveness. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 293–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Du, J., Chiu, Y., & Li, J. (2018a). Dynamic effects of customer experience levels on durable product satisfaction: Price and popularity moderation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 28, 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Wang, L., & Wang, M. (2018b). Understanding the effects of eWOM social ties on purchase intentions: A moderated mediation investigation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 28, 54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., Liu, X., & Fang, E. (2015). User reviews variance, critic reviews variance, and product sales: An exploration of customer breadth and depth effects. Journal of Retailing, 91(3), 372–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Wang, J., & Yao, T. (2019). What makes a helpful online review? A meta-analysis of review characteristics. Electronic Commerce Research, 19, 257–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Yu, C. (2017). Social interaction-based consumer decision-making model in social commerce: The role of word of mouth and observational learning. International Journal of Information Management, 37, 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C., Mai, F., & Li, X. (2021). The effect of content depth and deviation on online review helpfulness: Evidence from double-hurdle model. Information & Management, 58(2), 103408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., & Pearce, P. (2014). Chinese recreational vehicle users in Australia: A netnographic study of tourist motivation. Tourism Management, 43, 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi, Y., & Fan, Z. (2016). Method for determining attribute weights and ranking alternatives based online evaluation information. Control and Decision, 31(11), 1998–2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, Z., Schwartz, Z., Gerdes, J. H., & Uysal, M. (2015). What can big data and text analytics tell us about hotel guest experience and satisfaction? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 44, 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X. (2020). Examining an asymmetric effect between online customer reviews emphasis and overall satisfaction determinants. Journal of Business Research, 106, 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalch, R. F., & Spangenberg, E. R. (2000). The effects of music in a retail setting on real and perceived shopping times. Journal of Business Research, 49(2), 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Yang, D., Dyer, C., He, X., Smola, A. J., & Hovy, E. H. (2016). Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 1480–1489.

  • Yin, D., Bond, S., & Zhang, H. (2014). Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quarterly, 38(02), 539–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, D., Bond, S. D., & Zhang, H. (2017). Keep your cool or let it out: Nonlinear effects of expressed arousal on perceptions of consumer reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(3), 447–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Lin, Z. (2018). Predicting the helpfulness of online product reviews: A multilingual approach. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 27, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Yang, S., Li, Y., Chen, Y., Yao, J., & Atika, Q. (2020). Does the review deserve more helpfulness when its title resembles the content? Locating helpful reviews by text mining. Information Processing & Management, 57(2), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., & Yang, S. (2019). Roles of review numerical and textual characteristics on review helpfulness across three different types of reviews. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, 7, 27769–27780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work received supports from National Natural Science Foundation of China (71901169) and Youth Talent Promotion Project of China Association for Science and Technology (YESS20200072).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Authors have no conflict of interests to disclose that are related to the work in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Zhang, Y., Li, J. et al. The Role of Sentiment Tendency in Affecting Review Helpfulness for Durable Products: Nonlinearity and Complementarity. Inf Syst Front 25, 1459–1477 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10292-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10292-3

Keywords

Navigation