Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

To be or not to B2B: Evaluating managerial choices for e-procurement channel adoption

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

E-procurement systems are computer systems and communication networks through which firms buy and sell products. We identify two types of e-procurement systems: extranets and e-markets. Extranets connect the buyer and its suppliers with a closed network, while e-markets create open networks for buyer and supplier interactions. The differences between them lie in system implementation costs, marketplace benefits, and the extent of supplier competitive advantage that develops due to information sharing. In this article, we develop a new theoretical model to analyze the adoption of e-procurement systems from the buyer’s perspective, to explore the set of conditions under which the buyer will prefer to procure via an electronic market instead of using proprietary extranet connections. The primary finding is that a buyer will adopt an e-market approach when the supplier’s competitive advantage derived from access to strategic information is modest compared with the marketplace benefits less the channel costs. In addition, we find that the buyer is likely to have a bigger trading network with an e-market than with an extranet in order to capture the greatest available benefits. Overall, this study offers guidelines for managers to design and select e-procurement channels to fit different procurement needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Au and R.J. Kauffman, Should We Wait? Network Externalities, Compatibility, and Electronic Billing Adoption, Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (2001) 18– 46.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.Y. Bakos, A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplaces, MIS Quarterly 15 (1991) 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Barua and B. Lee, An Economic Analysis of the Introduction of an Electronic Data Interchange System, Information System Research 8 (1997) 398–422.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Benaroch and R.J. Kauffman, A Case for Using Real Options Pricing Analysis to Evaluate Information Technology Project Investments, Information Systems Research 10 (1999) 70–86.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. K. Chatfield and P. Yetton, Strategic payoff from EDI as a function of EDI embeddedness, Journal of Management Information Systems 16 (2000) 195–224.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Chwelos, I. Benbasat and A.S. Dexter, Empirical test of an EDI adoption model, Information Systems Research 12 (2001) 304–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T.H. Clark and H.G. Lee, Performance, interdependence and Coordination in Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce and Supply Chain Management, Information Technology and Management 1 (1999) 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Q. Dai and R.J. Kauffman, Business Models for Internet Based Procurement Systems and B2B Electronic Markets, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6 (2002) 41–72.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dow Chemical Company, e-Business @ Dow: Connecting with Dow–-Suppliers, retrieved in June (2003), available on the Internet at www.dow.com/ebusiness/what/s.htm.

  10. L. Garicano and S.N. Kaplan, The Effects of Business-to-Business E-Commerce on Transaction Costs, Journal of Industrial Economics 49 (2001) 463–485.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Gilbert, E-Procurement: Problems Behind the Promise, InformationWeek 813 (November 20, 2000) 49–57.

  12. M. Giudici, EDI giving way slowly to Net e-Biz, Electronic Buyers’ News 1237 (2000) 88–90.

  13. M. Hamblen, After the hype, Computerworld 36 (December 23, 2002) 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C.L. Iacovou, I. Benbasat and A.S. Dexter, Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and impact of technology, MIS Quarterly 19 (1995) 465–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. InformationWeek, At a glance: Suppliers in the electronic supply chain, (September 17, 2001). Available on the Internet at http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=6506684.

  16. H.R. Johnston and M.R. Vitale, Creating Competitive Advantage with Interorganizational Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 12 (1988) 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Karpinski, Wal-Mart pushes Web EDI, B to B 87 (October 14, 2002) 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. J. Kauffman and H. Mohtadi, Proprietary and open systems adoption: A risk-augmented transactions cost perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems 21 (2004) 137–166.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Kisiel, Suppliers, Big 3 want to streamline data exchange, Automotive News 77 (May 12, 2003) 8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H.G. Lee, T. Clark and K.Y. Tam, Can EDI benefit adopters? Information Systems Research 10 (1999) 186–195.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H.L. Lee, K.C. So and C.S. Tang, The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain, Management Science 46 (2000) 626–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H.L. Lee and S. Whang, Information Sharing In a Supply Chain, International Journal of Technology Management 20 (2000) 373–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. T. Mukhopadhyay, S. Kekre and S. Kalathur, Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange, MIS Quarterly 19 (1995) 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Neef, E-Procurement (Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Ovans, E-Procurement at Schlumberger, Harvard Business Review 78 (2000) 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M.E. Porter, Competitive Advantage (Free Press, New York, NY, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  27. F.J. Riggins, C.H. Kriebel and T. Mukhopadhyay, The Growth of Interorganizational Systems in the Presence of Network Externalities, Management Science 40 (1994) 984– 998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. F.J. Riggins and T. Mukhopadhyay, Overcoming Adoption and Implementation Risks of EDI, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 4 (1999) 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  29. F.J. Riggins and T. Mukhopadhyay, Interdependent Benefits from Interorganizational Systems: Opportunities for Business Partner Reengineering, Journal of Management Information Systems 11 (1994) 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  30. F.J. Riggins and H.-S. Rhee, Toward a Unified View of Electronic Commerce, Communications of the ACM 41 (1998) 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. F.J. Riggins and H.-S. Rhee, Developing the Learning Network Using Extranets, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 4 (1999) 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Rosall, Internet commerce buy- and Sell-Side Software Market Share and Forecast: 2000-2005, Gartner Inc., Stamford, CT, (January 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Seidmann and A. Sundararajan, Building and sustaining interorganizational information sharing relationships: The competitive impact of interfacing supply chain operations with marketing strategy, in: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS-97), J. DeGross and K. Kumar (eds.) (Atlanta, GA, December 1997).

  34. A.J. van Weele, Purchasing and Supply Chain Management (Thomson Learning, London, UK, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  35. E.G. Wang and A. Seidmann, Electronic Data Interchange: Competitive Externalities and Strategic Implementation Policies, Management Science 41 (1995) 401– 418.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LeBow College of Business, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104

    Qizhi Dai

  2. MIS Research Center, Chair, Information and Decision Sciences Department, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455

    Robert J. Kauffman

Authors
  1. Qizhi Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert J. Kauffman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qizhi Dai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, Q., Kauffman, R.J. To be or not to B2B: Evaluating managerial choices for e-procurement channel adoption. Inf Technol Manage 7, 109–130 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-006-8103-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-006-8103-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation