Skip to main content
Log in

The strategic knowledge-based dependency diagrams: a tool for analyzing strategic knowledge dependencies for the purposes of understanding and communicating

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of knowledge in organizations has been conceptualized in ways that range from viewing it as a primary input to the production process, to offering a knowledge-based view of the whole organization. While divergent in their approaches, the differing views increasingly emphasize the role of inter-functional and inter-organizational knowledge linkages in determining the performance of a firm (Grant and Baden-Fuller in J Manag Stud 41(1):61–84, 2004). This paper offers a conceptualization of these linkages in what is termed a knowledge dependency. Adopting the view of knowledge as the primary organizational resource (Grant in Strateg Manag J 17(Winter Special Issue):109–122, 1996), we use ideas and concepts from the resource dependency theory (Pfeffer and Salancik in The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective, 1978) and knowledge transformation cycle (Carlile and Rebentisch in Manag Sci 49(9):1180–1195, 2003) to identify relevant constructs and relationships needed to model these knowledge dependencies. Building on a number of already established modeling techniques, we propose a new modeling grammar that explicitly captures the appropriation of knowledge in activities needed to realize the identified goals, and the knowledge flows between the different actors in an application domain. The resulting script (strategic knowledge-based dependency diagram) is a conceptual model that aids in the analysis stage preceding the design of an information system that supports knowledge-based processes across organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wand Y, Weber R (2002) Research commentary: information systems and conceptual modeling—a research agenda. Inf Syst Res 13(4):363–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gemino A, Wand Y (2004) Dimensions in experimental evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques. Requir Eng J 9(4):248–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Franz CR, Robey D (1984) An investigation of user-led system design: rational and political perspectives. Commun ACM 27(12):1202–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kling R (1980) Social analyses of computing: theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. ACM Comput Surv 12(1):61–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tillquist J, King J, Woo C (2002) A representational scheme for analyzing information technology and organizational dependency. MIS Quart 26(2):91–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jasperson J, Carte TA, Saunders CS, Butler BS, Croes HJP, Zheng W (2002) Review: power and information technology research: a metatriangulation review. MIS Quart 26(4):397–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Markus ML (1984) Systems in organizations: bugs and features. Pitman, Marshfield

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sillince JA, Mouakket S (1997) Varieties of political process during systems development. Inf Syst Res 8(4):368–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dennis AR, Hilmer K, Taylor NJ (1998) Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence. J Manag Inf Syst 14(3):61–88

    Google Scholar 

  10. Williams SR, Wilson RL (1997) Group support systems, power and influence on an organization: a field study. Decis Sci 28(4):911–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DeSanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organ Sci 5(2):121–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ives B, Jarvenpaa SL (1991) Applications of global information technology: key issues for management. MIS Quart 15(1):33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mylopoulos J, Chung L, Yu E (1999) From object-oriented to goal-oriented requirements analysis. Commun ACM 42(1):31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van Lamsweerde A (2001) Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering, Toronto, Canada, pp 249–263

  15. Ellis CA, Wainer J (1994) Goal based models of collaboration. Collab Comput 1(1):61–86

    Google Scholar 

  16. Basu A, Blanning RW (2000) A formal approach to workflow analysis. Inf Syst Res 11(1):17–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Basu A, Blanning RW (2001) Workflow analysis using attributed metagraphs. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 1–9

  18. Yu E (1995) Models for supporting the redesign of organizational work. Proceedings of the conference on organizational computing systems, Milpitas, USA, pp 225–236

  19. Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grant R (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(Winter Special Issue):109–122

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carlile PR, Rebentisch ES (2003) Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle. Manag Sci 49(9):1180–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scarbrough H (1998) Path(ological) dependency? core competencies from an organizational perspective. Br J Manag 9(3):219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grant RM, Baden-Fuller C (2004) A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. J Manag Stud 41(1):61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Teece DJ (1992) Competition, cooperation, and innovation: organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. J Econ Behav Organ 18(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Malone TW, Crowston K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput Surv 26(1):87–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ Sci 15(5):555–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Am Sociol Rev 27(1):31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ulrich D, Barney J (1984) Perspectives on organizations: resource dependence, efficiency and population. Acad Manag Rev 9(3):471–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu E, Mylopoulos J (1993) An actor dependency model of organizational work with application to business process reengineering. Proceedings of the conference on organizational computing systems, Milpitas, USA, pp 258–268

  30. Nonaka I, Umemoto K, Senoo D (1996) From information processing to knowledge creation: a paradigm shift in business management. Technol Soc 18(2):203–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gorman M (2002) Types of knowledge and their roles in technology transfer. J Technol Transfer 27(3):219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sameh Al-Natour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Natour, S., Cavusoglu, H. The strategic knowledge-based dependency diagrams: a tool for analyzing strategic knowledge dependencies for the purposes of understanding and communicating. Inf Technol Manag 10, 103–121 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-009-0054-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-009-0054-5

Keywords

Navigation