Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ties with government, strategic capability, and organizational ambidexterity: evidence from China’s information communication technology industry

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizations that are capable of pursuing exploration and exploitative innovation strategies simultaneously have demonstrated superior performance. For information and communication technology (ICT) firms, it is especially critical to achieve such organizational ambidexterity in order to both allocate limited resources and pursue different innovation strategies appropriately. As the ICT industry in China faces higher environmental uncertainty, a less developed institutional framework, and increased power of market competition, we explore the antecedents of ambidexterity conjointly, considering the effects of institutions and organizational capabilities. Building on ambidexterity literature, we develop a capability-building framework to explore firms’ strategic choice-making between exploratory innovation strategy versus exploitation innovation strategy, and their orientation to pursuit one, or both. With survey data from China’s ICT industry, we find that ties with government promote an ambidextrous focus on both types of innovation strategies. In addition, we find that strategic capability partially mediates the main effects of ties with government on both exploratory and exploitative innovation strategies. Implications for organizational ambidexterity in China’s ICT industry are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abernathy WJ, Clark KB (1985) Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res Policy 14(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adler P, Seok-Woo K (2002) Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad Manage Rev 27(1):17–40

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2009) Exploitation-exploratory tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ Sci 20(4):696–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atuahene-Gima K, Ko A (2001) An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organ Sci 12(1):54–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atuahene-Gima K, Li HY (2004) Strategic decision comprehensiveness and product development outcomes in new technology firms. Acad Manage J 47(4):583–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Atuahene-Gima K, Li HY, De Luca LM (2006) The contingent value of marketing strategy innovativeness for product development performance in Chinese new technology firms. Ind Mark Manage 35(3):359–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Atuahene-Gima K, Murray JY (2007) Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: a social capital perspective on new technology firms in China. J Int Mark 15(2):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Augusto M, Coelho F (2009) Market orientation and new-to-the-world products: exploring the moderating effects of innovativeness, competitive strength, and environmental forces. Ind Mark Manage 38(1):94–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Balkin DB, Gomez-Mejia LR (1984) Determinants of R and D compensation strategies in the high tech industry. Pers Psychol 37(4):635–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Banker RD, Kalvenes J, Patterson RA (2006) Information technology, contract completeness and buyer-supplier relationships. Inf Syst Res 17(2):180–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bardhan IR, Gupta A, Tallon P (2008) Research perspectives on innovation through information technology management in a networked world. Inf Technol Manage 9(3):147–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barney J (1986) Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy. Manage Sci 32(10):1512–1514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 17(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  14. Batjargal B (2003) Social capital and entrepreneurial performance in Russia: a longitudinal study. Org Stud 24(4):535–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beckman CM (2006) The influence of finding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad Manage J 49(4):741–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Benner M, Tushman M (2003) Exploitation, exploratory, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Acad Manage Rev 28(2):238–256

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural equation modeling. Psychol Bull 107(2):238–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bierly PE, Chakrabarti AK (1996) Technological learning, strategic flexibility, and new product development in the Pharmaceutical Industry. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 43(4):368–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Blyler M, Coff RW (2003) Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: ties that split pies. Strateg Manage J 24(7):677–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bogner WC, Thomas H, McGee J (1996) A longitudinal study of the competitive positions and entry paths of European firms in the US pharmaceutical market. Strateg Manage J 17(2):85–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boisot M, Child J (1996) From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: explaining China’s emerging economic order. Adm Sci Q 41(4):600–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bollen KA, Lennox R (1991) Conventional wisdom and measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychol Bull 110(2):305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1995) Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad Manage Rev 20(2):343–378

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bruton GD, Ahlstrom D, Li HL (2010) Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrep Theory Pract 34(3):421–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bruton GD, Lau CM (2008) Asian management research: status today and future outlook. J Manage Stud 45(3):636–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2000) Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J Econ Perspect 14(4):23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Burr LC, Patterson R, Rolland E, Ward K (2007) Integration of E-CRM in healthcare services: a framework for analysis. Int J E Bus Res 3(2):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  29. Burt RS (1997) The contingent value of social capital. Adm Sci Q 42(2):339–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cai L, Hughes M, Yin M (2013) The relationship between resource acquisition methods and firm performance in Chinese new ventures: the intermediate effect of learning capability. J Bus Manage. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12039

    Google Scholar 

  31. Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56(2):81–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cao Q, Gedajlovic E, Zhang H (2009) Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organ Sci 20(4):781–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cao W, Xu L, Liang L, Chaudhry SS (2012) The impact of team task and job engagement on the transfer of tacit knowledge in e-business virtual teams. Inf Technol Manage 13(4):333–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chamberlain NW (1968) Enterprise and environment: the firm in time and place. McGraw-Hill, New York

  35. Cheng YT, Van de Ven AH (1996) Learning the innovation journey: order out of chaos? Organ Sci 7(6):593–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chiang RI, Nunez MA (2013) Strategic alignment and value maximization for IT project portfolios. Inf Technol Manage 14(2):143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Child J, Chung L, Davies H (2003) The performance of cross-border units in China: a test of natural selection, strategic choice and contingency theories. J Int Bus Stud 34(3):242–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strateg Manage J 17(3):197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cohen J (1978) Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components. Psychol Bull 85(4):858–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Coleman JS (1990) Findations of social theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  42. Conner KR, Prahalad CK (1996) A resources-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism. Organ Sci 7(5):477–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Coviello NE (2006) The network dynamics of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 37(5):713–731

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Croteau A, Raymond L (2004) Performance outcomes of strategic and IT competencies alignment. J Inf Technol 19(3):178–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Dahlin KB, Behrens DM (2005) When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Res Policy 34(5):717–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dannels E (2002) The dynamics of product innovation and firm competence. Strateg Manage J 23(12):1095–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Day G (1994) The capabilities of market driven organization. J Mark 58(4):37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Dimov D, Gedajlovic E (2010) A property rights perspective on venture capital investment decisions. J Manage Stud 47(7):1248–1271

    Google Scholar 

  50. Dhanaraj C, Lyles MA, Steensma HK, Tihanyi L (2004) Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. J Int Bus Stud 35(5):428–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Dubini P, Aldrich HE (1991) Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. J Bus Ventur 6(5):305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1990) Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Adm Sci Q 35(3):504–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Floyd SW, Lane PJ (2000) Strategizing throughout the organization: managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad Manage Rev 25(1):154–177

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fornell CD, Larcker F (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. J Mark Res 18:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Gao Y (2006) Building guanxi with government for foreign companies in China: a case study on the application of commitment instrument. Bus Rev Camb 6(2):119–125

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gedajlovic E, Cao Q, Zhang H (2012) Corporate shareholdings and organizational ambidexterity in high-tech SMEs: evidence from a transitional economy. J Bus Ventur 27(6):652–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Gerbing DW, Anderson JC (1988) An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J Mark Res 25:186–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ghemawat P, Ricart I, Costa JE (1993) The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strateg Manage J 14(S2):59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad Manage J 47(2):209–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Grant RM (1991) The resources-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif Manage Rev 33(3):114–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Grewal R, Tansuhaj P (2001) Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis: the role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. J Mark 65(2):67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gronhaug K, Kaufmann G (eds) (1988) Innovation: a cross-disciplinary perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  63. Gulati R, Puranam P (2009) Renewal through reorganization: the value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ Sci 20(2):422–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad Manage J 49(4):693–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Guthrie D (2005) Organizational learning and productivity: state structure and foreign investment in the rise of the Chinese corporation. Manage Organ Rev 1(2):165–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Uppersaddle River

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hannan MT, Freeman JH (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Am Sociol Rev 49(2):149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hansen MT (2002) Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ Sci 13(3):232–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Harrison DA, Mclaughlin ME, Coalter TM (1996) Context, cognition, and common method variance: psychometric and verbal protocol evidence. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 68(3):246–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. He ZL, Wong PK (2004) Exploratory vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ Sci 15(4):481–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Holmqvist M (2004) Experiential learning processes of exploratory and exploitation within and between organizations: an empirical study of product development. Organ Sci 15(1):70–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6(1):1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Hung RYY, Yang B, Lien BYH, McLean GN, Kuo YM (2010) Dynamic capability: impact of process alignment and organizational learning culture on performance. J World Bus 45(3):285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Ibarra H (1995) Race, opportunity, and diversity in social circles in managerial networks. Acad Manage J 38(3):673–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Inkpen AC, Tsang EWK (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad Manage Rev 30(1):146–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manage Sci 52(11):1661–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Jaworski BJ, Kohli AK (1993) Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. J Mark 57(3):53–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Joreskog KG, Sorbom D (1984) LISREL VI: user guide, 3rd edn. Scientific Software International Inc, US

    Google Scholar 

  79. Kataev M, Bulysheva L, Emelyanenko A, Emelyanenko V (2013) Enterprise systems in Russia: 1992–2012. Enterp Inf Syst 7(2):169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Knudsen MP (2007) The relative importance of interfirm relationships and knowledge transfer for new product development success. J Prod Innov Manage 24(2):117–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Larson A (1991) Partner networks: leveraging external ties to improve entrepreneurial performance. J Bus Ventur 6(3):173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Le C, Gu X, Pan K, Dai F, Qi G (2013) Public and expert collaborative evaluation model and algorithm for enterprise knowledge. Enterp Inf Syst 7(3):375–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Leiponen A (2006) Managing knowledge for innovation: the case of business-to-business services. J Prod Innov Manage 23(3):238–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Levinthal D, March J (1993) The myopia of learning. Strateg Manage J 14(S2):95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Li HY, Atuahene-Gima K (2001) Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology firms in China. Acad Manage J 44(6):1123–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Li HY, Atuahene-Gima K (2002) The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, and performance in Chinese technology firms. Strateg Manage J 23(6):469–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Li HY, Zhang Y (2007) The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new firm performance: evidence from China’s transition economy. Strateg Manage J 28(8):791–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Li L (2012) Effects of enterprise technology on supply chain collaborations: analysis of China-linked supply chain. Enterp Inf Syst 6(1):55–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Li S, Xu L, Wang X, Wang J (2012) Integration of hybrid wireless networks in cloud services oriented enterprise information systems. Enterp Inf Syst 6(2):165–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Li T, Calantone RJ (1998) The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: conceptualization and empirical examination. J Mark 62(4):13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Li Y, Hou M, Liu H, Liu Y (2012) Towards a theoretical framework of strategic decision, supporting capability and information sharing under the context of Internet of Things. Inf Technol Manage 13(4):205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Lu Y, Zhou L, Bruton G, Li WW (2010) Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and the international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy. J Int Bus Stud 41(3):419–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Lubatkin MH, Simsek Z, Ling Y, Veiga JF (2006) Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. J Manage 32(5):646–672

    Google Scholar 

  94. Luo Y (2003) Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: the case of China. Strateg Manage J 24(13):1315–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Luo Y, Peng MW (1999) Learning to compete in a transition economy: Experience, environment, and performance. J Int Bus Stud 30(2):269–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Maghroori R, Rolland E (1997) Strategic leadership: the art of balancing organizational mission with policy, procedures, and external environment. J Leadersh Organ Stud 4:62–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Makadok R (2001) Toward a synthesis of the resources-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strateg Manage J 22(3):387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Montano BR, Dillon R (2005) The impact of technology on relationships within organizations. Inf Technol Manage 6(2–3):227–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. March JG (1991) Exploratory and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  101. Mascitelli R (2000) From experience: harnessing tacit knowledge to achieve breakthrough innovation. J Prod Innov Manage 17(3):179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. McDougall PP, Covin JG, Robinson RB, Herron L (1994) The effects of industry growth and strategic breadth on new firm performance and strategy content. Strateg Manage J 15(7):537–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. McEvily B, Zaheer A (1999) Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strateg Manage J 20(12):1133–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Mentzas G, Apostolou D, Kafentzis K, Georgolios P (2006) Inter-organizational networks for knowledge sharing and trading. Inf Technol Manage 7(4):259–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Merenda PF (1997) A guide to the proper use of factor analysis in the conduct and reporting of research: pitfalls to avoid. Meas Eval Couns Dev 30(3):156–164

    Google Scholar 

  106. Miller CC, Cardinal LB, Glick WH (1997) Retrospective reports in organizational research: a reexamination of recent evidence. Acad Manage J 40(1):189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Miller D, Friesen PH (1983) Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strateg Manage J 4(3):221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Nee V (1992) Organizational dynamics of market transition: hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Adm Sci Q 37(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  110. O’Reilly CA III, Tushman ML (2008) Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Res Organ Behav 28:185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Oi JC (1995) The role of the local state in China’s transitional economy. China Q 144(1):1132–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Pardo TA, Cresswell AM, Thompson F, Zhang J (2006) Knowledge sharing in cross-boundary information system development in the public sector. Inf Technol Manage 7(4):293–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Peng MW (2001) The resource-based view and international business. J Manage 27(6):803–829

    Google Scholar 

  114. Peng MW, Heath PS (1996) The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Acad Manage Rev 21(20):492–528

    Google Scholar 

  115. Peng MW, Luo Y (2000) Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: the nature of a micro-macro link. Acad Manage J 43(3):486–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Peng MW, Sun SL, Brian P, Chen H (2009) The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Acad Manage Perspect 23(3):63–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Peretaf M (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resources-based view. Strateg Manage J 14(3):179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Podolny JM, Baron JN (1997) Resources and relationships: social networks and mobility in the workplace. Am Sociol Rev 62(5):673–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manage 12(4):531–544

    Google Scholar 

  120. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioural research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Qin ZH, Li R (2013) An empirical study on the impact of R&D investment and employee involvement on innovation commercialization: evidence from ICT firms in China. In Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), 2013 International conference, pp 1866–1875

  122. Rolland E, Gregg J (2012) Technology and management communication. In: Management communication: an anthology (2nd edn). Cognella, San Diego

  123. Rosen RJ (1991) Research and development with asymmetric firm sizes. Rand J Econ 22(3):411–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Ross J, Staw BM (1993) Organizational escalation and exit: lessons from the Shoreham nuclear power plant. Acad Manage J 36(4):701–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Sanchez R (1995) Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strateg Manag J 16(S1):135–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Shane S, Eckhardt J (2003) The individual-opportunity nexus. In: Acs ZJ, Audretsch D (eds) Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Kluwer, Boston, pp 161–194

  127. Shepherd DA, Patzelt H, Wolfe M (2011) Moving forward from project failure: negative emotions, affective commitment, and learning from the experience. Acad Manage J 54(6):1229–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Shimizu K, Hitt MA (2004) Strategic flexibility: organizational preparedness to reverse ineffective strategic decisions. Acad Manage Exec 18(4):44–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Shu C, Page AL, Gao S, Jiang X (2012) Managerial ties and firm innovation: is knowledge creation a missing link? J Prod Innov Manage 29(1):125–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Simsek Z, Heavey C, Veiga JF et al (2009) A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. J Manage Stud 46(5):864–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Slater S, Olson EM, Hult GTM (2006) The moderating influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability-performance relationship. Strateg Manage J 27(1):1221–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Smith M, Giraud-Carrier C, Purser N (2009) Implicit affinity networks and social capital. Inf Technol Manage 10(2–3):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ Sci 16(5):522–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Steiger J, Lind J (1980) Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA

    Google Scholar 

  135. Stinchcombe AL (1965) Organizations and social structure. In: March JG (ed) Handbook of organizations. Rand McNally, Chicago, IL, pp 142–193

    Google Scholar 

  136. Sun Y, Zhou Y (2011) Innovation and inter-firm technological networking: evidence from China’s information communication technology industry. Erdkunde 65(1):55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Sunramaniam M, Youndt MA (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Acad Manage J 48(3):450–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Tafti A, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2007) Information technology and the autonomy–control duality: toward a theory. Inf Technol Manage 8(2):147–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature of microfindations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manage J 28(13):1319–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manage J 18(7):537–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Tian Y, Li Y, Wei Z (2013) Managerial incentive and external knowledge acquisition under technological uncertainty: a nested system perspective. Syst Res Behav Sci 30(3):214–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Tidd J (1995) Development of novel product through intraorganizational and interorganizational networks. J Prod Innov Manage 12(4):307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Tippins MJ, Sohi RS (2003) IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? Strateg Manage J 24(8):745–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Tsang EWK (1998) Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Acad Manage Exec 12(2):64–73

    Google Scholar 

  145. Tsui AS, Ferh JL (1997) Where guanxi matters: regional demography in the Chinese context. Work Occup 24(1):56–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Tucker L, Lewis C (1973) A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Adm Sci Q 31(3):439–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Tushman M, O’Reilly C (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif Manage Rev 38(4):8–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Tushman ML, Nelson RR (1990) Introduction: technology, organizations and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(10):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Tushman ML, Smith W (2002) Organizational technology: technological change, ambidextrous organizations and organizational evolution. In: Baum JAC (ed) Blackwell companion to organizations. Blackwell Publishers, Boston, pp 386–414

    Google Scholar 

  151. Usunier JC (2000) Marketing across cultures, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, Prentice Hall Europe, Essex, UK

    Google Scholar 

  152. Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2009) Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35(3):835–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Walder AG (1995) Local government as industrial firms: an organizational analysis of China’s transitional economy. Am J Sociol 101(2):263–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Wang CL, Ahmed PK (2007) Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. Int J Manage Rev 9(1):31–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Winter SG, Szulanski G (2001) Replication as strategy. Organ Sci 12(6):730–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Worren N, Moore K, Cardona P (2002) Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: a study of the home appliance industry. Strateg Manage J 23(12):1123–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Xin KR, Pearce JL (1996) Guanxi: connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Acad Manage J 39(6):1641–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Xu L, Wang C, Bi Z, Yu J (2012) AutoAssem: an automated assembly planning system for complex products. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 8(3):669–678

    Google Scholar 

  159. Yeo LM, Rolland E, Rees J, Patterson RA (2014) Risk mitigation decisions for IT security. ACM transactions of management information systems, 2014

  160. Yoon C, Rolland E (2014) Understanding continuance use in social networking services. J Comput Inf Syst (in press)

  161. Yiu DW, Lau CM, Bruton GD (2007) International venturing by emerging economy firms: the effects of firm capabilities, home country networks, and corporate entrepreneurship. J Int Bus Stud 38(4):519–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Yu X, Chen Y, Nguyen B (2014) Knowledge management, learning behavior from failure, and new product development in new technology ventures. Syst Res Behav Sci (in press)

  163. Zahra SA, Das SR (1993) Innovation strategy and financial performance in manufacturing companies: an empirical analysis. Prod Oper Manage 2(1):15–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Zahra SA, Ireland RD, Gutierrez I, Hitt MA (2000) Introduction to special topic forum privatization and entrepreneurial transformation: emerging issues and a future research agenda. Acad Manage Rev 25(3):509–524

    Google Scholar 

  165. Zander U, Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organ Sci 6(1):76–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  166. Zhang Y, Li HY (2010) Innovation search of new firms in a technology cluster: the role of tie with service intermediates. Strateg Manage J 31(1):88–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Zhou KZ, Wu F (2010) Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strateg Manage J 31(5):547–561

    Google Scholar 

  168. Zhou L, Wu W, Luo X (2007) Internationalization and the performance of born-global SMEs: the mediating role of social networks. J Int Bus Stud 38(4):673–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Zhou Z, Xiao Z, Liu Q, Ai Q (2013) An analytical approach to customer requirement information processing. Enterp Inf Syst 7(4):543–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. Zirger BJ, Maidique MA (1990) A model of new product development: an empirical test. Manage Sci 36(7):867–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Zott C (2003) Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strateg Manage J 24(2):97–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Zumbo BD, Gadermann AM, Zeisser C (2007) Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 6(1):21–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71102030), the National Social Science Foundation of China (11&ZD035), Shanghai First-class Key Discipline (B), and the Project of ‘Social Development of Metropolis and Construction of Smart City’ (085SHDX001). We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their inspiring comments and constructive suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China

    Xiaoyu Yu & Yi Chen

  2. School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China

    Bang Nguyen

  3. School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China

    Wenhong Zhang

Authors
  1. Xiaoyu Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bang Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenhong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bang Nguyen.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Measurement items and validity assessment
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, X., Chen, Y., Nguyen, B. et al. Ties with government, strategic capability, and organizational ambidexterity: evidence from China’s information communication technology industry. Inf Technol Manag 15, 81–98 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0175-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0175-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation