Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A trust model for online peer-to-peer lending: a lender’s perspective

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending is a new but essential financing method for small and micro enterprises that is conducted on the Internet and excludes the involvement of collateral and financial institutions. To tackle the inherent risk of this new financing method, trust must be cultivated. Based on trust theories, the present study develops an integrated trust model specifically for the online P2P lending context, to better understand the critical factors that drive lenders’ trust. The model is empirically tested using surveyed data from 785 online lenders of PPDai, the first and largest online P2P platform in China. The results show that both trust in borrowers and trust in intermediaries are significant factors influencing lenders’ lending intention. However, trust in borrowers is more critical, and not only directly nurtures lenders’ lending intention more efficiently than trust in intermediaries, but also carries the impact of trust in intermediaries on lenders’ lending intention. To develop lenders’ trust, borrowers should provide high-quality information for their loan requests and intermediaries should provide high-quality services and sufficient security protection. The findings provide valuable insights for both borrowers and intermediaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lin MF, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2009) Social networks as signaling mechanisms: evidence from online peer-to-peer lending. Working paper http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~bakos/wise/papers/wise2009-p09_paper.pdf

  2. Prosper (2010) Prosper closing in on $200 million in loans and series D. Prosper Blog

  3. Krauter SG, Kaluscha EA (2008) Consumer trust in electronic commerce: conceptualization and classification of trust building measures. In: Kautonen T, Karjaluoto H (eds) Trust and new technologies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lin MF, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2009) Can social networks help mitigate information asymmetry in online markets. Paper presented at the thirtieth international conference on information systems, Phoenix

  5. Kim D, Benbasat I (2009) Trust-assuring arguments in B2C e-commerce: impact of content, source, and price on trust. J Manag Inf Syst 26(3):175–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McKnight DH, Chervany NL (2002) What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology. Int J Electron Commer 6(2):35–59

    Google Scholar 

  7. McKnight DH, Choudhury V, Kacmar C (2002) Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Inf Syst Res 13(3):334–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pavlou PA (2003) Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int J Electron Commer 7(3):101–134

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jun C, Sally D (2010) Consumer trust in the online retail context: exploring the antecedents and consequences. Psychol Mark 27(4):323–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW (2003) Trust and tam in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Q 27(1):51–90

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao AL, Koenig-Lewis N, Hanmer-Lloyd S, Ward P (2010) Adoption of Internet banking services in China: is it all about trust? Int J Bank Mark 28(1):7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karnouskos S, Hondroudaki A, Vilmos A, Csik B (2004) Security, trust and privacy in the secure mobile payment service. In: 3rd international conference on mobile business, New York, Citeseer, pp 3–5

  13. Kim C, Tao W, Shin N, Kim KS (2010) An empirical study of customers’ perceptions of security and trust in e-payment systems. Electron Commer Res Appl 9(1):84–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ba S (2001) Establishing online trust through a community responsibility system. Decis Support Syst 31(3):323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu Y, Zhao L, Wang B (2010) From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers’ purchase intention. Electron Commer Res Appl 9(4):346–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y, Chen XH, Xing ZY (2009) Supervision and oversight in network loan. Econ Life 12(1):46–47

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lin MF Peer-to-peer lending: an empirical study. In: AMCIS 2009 doctoral consortium, San Francisco, CA, Feb 20 2009 pp 1–7

  18. Collier B, Hampshire R (2010) Sending mixed signals: Multilevel reputation effects in peer-to-peer lending markets. In: ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, Savannah, GA, USA, Feb 6–10 pp 197–206

  19. Greiner ME, Wang H (2009) The role of social capital in people-to-people lending marketplaces. In: Thirtieth international conference on information systems, Phoenix. pp 1–17

  20. Chen DY, Ding J, Jiang SJ, Zhang N (2011) Antecedents of initial trust in the online peer-to-peer lending marketplace. Paper presented at the 2011 international conference on innovation and information management, Tianjing

  21. Xu Y, Qiu J, Chen D (2010) Profit vs. non-profit business based on P2P lending: a cross-country multiple case study. Paper presented at the the 10th international conference on electronic business, Chengdu

  22. Rotter JB (1967) A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. J Pers 35(4):651–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bradach JL, Eccles RG (1989) Price, authority, and trust: from ideal types to plural forms. Ann Rev Sociol 15(1):97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):709–734

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chiu C-M, Huang H-Y, Yen C-H (2010) Antecedents of trust in online auctions. Electron Commer Res Appl 9(2):148–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dirks KT, Ferrin DL (2001) The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ Sci 12(4):450–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gefen D, Benbasat I, Pavlou P (2008) A research agenda for trust in online environments. J Manag Inf Syst 24(4):275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rotter JB (1971) Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. Am Psychol 26(5):443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McKnight DH, Cummings LL, Chervany NL (1998) Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad Manag Rev 23(3):473–490

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jarvenpaa SL, Tractinsky N, Saarinen L (1999) Consumer trust in an Internet store: a cross-cultural validation. J Comput-Mediat Commun 5(2):1–35

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gefen D (2000) E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega 28(6):725–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brewer MB, Silver M (1978) Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics. Eur J Soc Psychol 8(3):393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shapiro SP (1987) The social control of impersonal trust. Am J Sociol 93(3):623–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pavlou PA, Gefen D (2004) Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inf Syst Res 15(1):37–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liang H, Laosethakul K, Lloyd SJ, Xue Y (2005) Information systems and health care-I: trust, uncertainty, and online prescription filling. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 15(1):41–60

    Google Scholar 

  36. Robert LP, Denis AR, Hung YTC (2009) Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. J Manag Inf Syst 26(2):241–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gefen D, Straub DW (2004) Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega 32(6):407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Koufaris M, Hampton-Sosa W (2004) The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers. Inf Manag 41(3):377–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pavlou PA (2002) Institution-based trust in interorganizational exchange relationships: the role of online B2B marketplaces on trust formation. J Strateg Inf Syst 11(3–4):215–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Teo TSH, Srivastava SC, Jiang LI (2008) Trust and electronic government success: an empirical study. J Manag Inf Syst 25(3):99–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pavlou PA, Fygenson M (2006) Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Q 30(1):115–143

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lin MF, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Mana Sci 59(1):17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Julsrud TE, Bakke JW (2008) Interpersonal trust and mobile communication: a social network approach. In: Kautonen T, Karjaluoto H (eds) Trust and new technologies: marketing and management on the Internet and mobile media. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 182–204

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lewis JD, Weigert AJ (1985) Trust as a social reality. Soc Forces 63(4):967–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Grover V, Myun Joong C, Teng JTC (1996) The effect of service quality and partnership on the outsourcing of information systems functions. J Manag Inf Syst 12(4):89–116

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kim DJ, Feeein DL, Rao HR (2008) A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: the role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decis Support Syst 44(2):544–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Watson RT, Leyland FP, Kavan CB (1998) Measuring information systems service quality: lessons from two longitudinal case studies. MIS Q 22(1):61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 64(1):12–40

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wixom BH, Todd PA (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf Syst Res 16(1):85–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Eisingerich AB, Bell SJ (2008) Perceived service quality and customer trust: does enhancing customers’ service knowledge matter? J Serv Res 10(3):256–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lu Y, Zhang L, Wang B (2009) A multidimensional and hierarchical model of mobile service quality. Electron Commer Res Appl 8(5):228–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Nicolaou AI, McKnight DH (2006) Perceived information quality in data exchanges: effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Inf Syst Res 17(4):332–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Pennanen K, Paakki MK, Kaapu T (2008) Consumers’ view on trust, risk, privacy and security in e-commerce: a qualitative analysis. In: Kautonen T, Karjaluoto H (eds) Trust and new technologies. Edward Elgar, Longdon, pp 102–126

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mitchell VW (1999) Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and models. Eur J Mark 33(1/2):163–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Doney PM, Cannon JP (1997) An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. J Mark 61(2):35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Brown HG, Scott Poole M, Rodgers TL (2004) Interpersonal traits, complementarity, and trust in virtual collaboration. J Manag Inf Syst 20(4):115–137

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sun H (2010) Sellers’ trust and continued use of online marketplaces. J Assoc Inf Syst 11(4):182–211

    Google Scholar 

  58. Grabner-Krauter S, Kaluscha EA (2008) Consumer trust in electronic commerce: conceptualization and classification of trust building measures. In: Kautonen T, Karjaluoto H (eds) Trust and new technologies: marketing and management on the Internet and mobile media. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  59. Anderson J, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(5):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Bollen K (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  61. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gefen D, Straub D (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 16:91–109

    Google Scholar 

  63. Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA (2006) Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration. Br J Manag 17(4):263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Liang HG, Saraf N, Hu Q, Xue JY (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Q 31(1):59–87

    Google Scholar 

  66. Yin R (2009) Case study research: Design and methods. Sage

  67. Pavlou PA, Liang HG, Xue JJ (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: a principal-agent perspective. MIS Q 31(1):105–136

    Google Scholar 

  68. Jarvenpaa SL, Tracinsky N, Vitale M (2000) Consumer trust in an Internet store. Inf Technol Mana 1(12):45–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71302008) and National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 11AZD077).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dongwu Business School, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China

    Dongyu Chen & Fujun Lai

  2. College of Business, University of Southern Mississippi, Long Beach, MS, 39560, USA

    Fujun Lai

  3. The Rawls College of Business Administration, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA

    Zhangxi Lin

Authors
  1. Dongyu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fujun Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhangxi Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fujun Lai.

Appendix

Appendix

(See Table 6)

Table 6 The instrument
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, D., Lai, F. & Lin, Z. A trust model for online peer-to-peer lending: a lender’s perspective. Inf Technol Manag 15, 239–254 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0187-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0187-z

Keywords