Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Factors affecting smart learning adoption in workplaces: comparing large enterprises and SMEs

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of learning through smart devices has facilitated information acquisition and improved knowledge sharing. This study analyzes the adoption and diffusion of smart learning from the human resource development (HRD) managerial perspective, based on a modified technology acceptance model which reflects perceived risk (PR) and organizational innovativeness (OI). Further, the results of a comparative analysis on large enterprises and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) reveal that their adoption of smart learning differs. First, large enterprises emphasize perceived ease of use (PEOU) as a reason for adoption, while SMEs emphasize perceived usefulness (PU). Second, while OI affects both types of enterprises, PR is statistically significant only for large enterprises. Finally, mobility and interactivity, important features of smart learning, have different effects on PEOU and PU for the two types of companies. This analysis provides useful guidance for HRD managers, solution providers, and content providers for improving workplace learning and thus creating more value for companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn JH, Kim MS, Lee DJ (2005) Learning from the failure: experiences in the Korean telecommunications market. Technovation 25(1):69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2010) Time flies when you are having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart 24(4):665–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anandarajan M, Igbaria M, Anakwe U (2002) IT acceptance in a less-developed country: a motivational factor perspective. Int J Infor Manag 22:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arturo S, Javier O (2010) Implications of 4G connectivity related to m-learning contexts. J Res Cen Educ Technol 6(1):129–135

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barua AC, Whinston AB (1996) Creating a collaboratory in cyberspace: theoretical foundation and an implementation. J Org Comput 5(4):417–442

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barnett R (1999) Learning to work and working to learn. In: Boud D, Garrick J (eds) Understanding learning at work. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beamish N, Armistead C, Watkinson M, Armfiled G (2002) The development of e-learning in UK/European corporate organizations. Eur Bus J 14(3):105–115

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng B, Wang M, Moormann J, Olaniran BA, Chen N (2012) The effects of organizational learning environment factors on e-learning acceptance. Comput Educ 58(3):885–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng JMS, Sheen GJ, Lou GC (2006) Consumer acceptance of the internet as a channel of distribution in Taiwan? A channel function perspective. Technovation 26(7):856–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng YM (2012) Exploring the roles of interaction and flow in explaining nurses’ e-learning acceptance. Nur Edu Today 33(1):73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho K, Park SR, Nam D, Ahn B, Lee RJ (2012) An implementation of computer simulation-based smart learning system for higher education: EDISON. Int J Smart Home 6(3):91–98

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ciganek AP, Haseman W, Ramamurthy K (2012) Time to decision: the drivers of innovation adoption decisions. Enterp Inf Syst 8(2):279–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dahl DW, Page M (2002) The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J Mark Res 39(February):47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart 13(3):319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fathian M, Akhavan P, Hoorali M (2008) E-readiness assessment of non-profit ICT SMEs in a developing country: the case of Iran. Technovation 28(9):578–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hester AJ (2011) A comparative analysis of the usage and infusion of Wiki and Non-Wiki-Based knowledge management systems. Inf Technol Manag 12(4):335–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang JH, Lin YR, Chuang ST (2007) Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning: a perspective of the extended technology acceptance model. Elect Lib 25(5):585–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hurley RF, Hult T (1998) Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an Integration and empirical examination. J Mark 62(3):42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Im I, Kim Y, Han HJ (2008) The effects of perceived risk, technology type, and experience on user’s acceptance of technologies. Infor Manag 45(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jack SL, Dodd SD, Anderson AR (2004) Social structures and entrepreneurial networks: the strength of strong ties. Int J Entre Innov 5(2):107–120

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jin BH, Li YM (2012) Analysis of emerging technology adoption for the digital content market. Inf Technol Manag 13(3):149–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Karaali D, Gumussoy CA, Calisir F (2011) Factors affecting the intention to use a web-based learning system among blue-collar workers in the automotive industry. Comput Hum Beh 27(1):343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Keizer JA, Dijkstra L, Halman JJM (2002) Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs: an exploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in the Netherlands. Technovation 22(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim HW, Chan HC, Gupta S (2007) Valued based Adoption of Mobile Internet: an empirical investigation. Decis Support Syst 43(1):111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim S, Song SM, Yoon YI (2011) Smart learning services based on smart cloud computing. Sensors 11(8):7835–7850

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Laurel B (1993) Computers as theatre. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee BC, Yoon JO, Lee I (2009) Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: theories and results. Comput Educ 53(4):1320–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee D, Rhee Y, Dunham RB (2009) The role of organizational and individual characteristics in technology acceptance. Int J Hum-Comput Interac 25(7):623–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee J, Lee D, Moon J, Park M (2013) Factors affecting the perceived usability of the mobile web portal services: comparing simplicity with consistency. Inf Technol Manag 14(1):43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee MS, Son YE (2012) A study on the adoption of SNS for smart learning in the ‘Creative Activity’. Int J Educ Learn 1(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lee Y, Hsieh Y, Ma C (2011) A model of organizational employees’ e-learning systems acceptance. Knowl Based Syst 24(3):355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin CC (2013) Exploring the relationship between technology acceptance model and usability test. Inf Technol Manag 14(3):243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lin WB (2008) Investigation on the model of consumers’ perceived risk-integrated viewpoint. Exp Syst Appl 34(1):977–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu Y, Li H, Carlsson C (2010) Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: an empirical study. Comput Educ 55(3):1211–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lockyer L, Patterson J (2008) Integrating social networking technologies in education: a case study of a formal learning environment. In: Proceeding of 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Santander, Spain, 529–533

  37. Mallat N, Rossi M, Tuunainen VK, Oorni A (2008) An empirical investigation of mobile ticketing service adoption in public transportation. Pers Ubiq Comput 12(1):57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Martínez-Torres MR, Marín SLT, García FB, Vázquez SG, Oliva MA, Torres T (2008) A technological acceptance of e-learning tools used in practical and laboratory teaching. According to the European higher education area 1. Behav Infor Technol 27(6):495–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Meister JC, Willyerd K (2010) The 2020 Workplace. HarperBusiness

  40. Moore MG (2001) Surviving as a distance teacher. Am J Dist Educ 15(2):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nystroma PC, Ramamurthy K, Wilson AL (2002) Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: adoption of imaging technology. J Eng Technol Manage 19(3/4):221–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nilcan CO, Feride T (2012) Is M-learning versus e-learning or are they supporting each other? Proc Soc Behav Sci 46:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ong C, Lai J, Wang Y (2004) Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Inf Manag 41(6):795–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Park Y, Son H, Kim C (2012) Investigating the determinants of construction professionals’ acceptance of web-based training: an extension of the technology. Automat constr 22:377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pituch KA, Lee YK (2006) The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Comput Educ 47(2):222–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Paechter M, Maier B, Macher D (2010) Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Comput Educ 54(1):222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ramdani B, Kawalek P, Lorenzo O (2009) Predicting SMEs’ adoption of enterprise systems. J Enterp Inf Manag 22(1/2):10–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Roca J, Gagne M (2008) Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: a selfdetermination theory perspective. Comput Hum Behav 24(4):1585–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Saade R, Bahli B (2005) The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manag 42(2):317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Seppala P, Alamaki H (2003) Mobile learning in teacher training. J Comput Assist Learn 19(3):330–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shin DH, Shin YJ, Choo H, Beom K (2011) Smartphones as smart pedagogical tools: implications for smartphones as u-learning devices. Comput Hum Behav 27(6):2207–2214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tambouris E, Panopoulou E, Tarabanis K, Ryberg T, Buus L, Peristeras V, Lee D, Porwol L (2012) Enabling problem based learning through web 2.0 technologies: PBL 2.0. Educ. Technol Soc 15(4):238–251

    Google Scholar 

  53. Taylor M, Murphy A (2004) SMEs and e-business. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 11(3):280–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Teo HH, Wei KK, Benbasat I (2003) Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. MIS Quart 27(1):19–49

    Google Scholar 

  55. Teo T, Lee CB, Chai CS (2007) Understanding pre-service teachers’ computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model. J Comput Assis Learn 24(2):128–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Teo T, Wong SL, Chai CS (2008) A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysia pre-service teachers: an application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Educ Technol Soc 11(4):265–280

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tian Y, Li Y, Wei Z (2013) Managerial incentive and external knowledge acquisition under technological uncertainty: a nested system perspective. Syst Res Behav Sci 30(3):214–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Tynjala P (2008) Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educ Res Rev 3(2):130–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Van Raaij EM, Schepers JJL (2008) The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Comput Educ 50(3):838–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal fields studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart 27(3):425–478

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wu W, Wu YJ, Chen C, Kao H, Lin C, Huang S (2012) Review of trends from mobile learning studies: a meta-analysis. Comput Educ 59(2):817–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Yang SY, Fang HC, Chuang C, Li H (2011) Applying the technology acceptance model to investigate consumers’ acceptance of digital learning system. Energy Procedia 13:3166–3173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Yoo SJ, Han S, Huang W (2012) The roles of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic motivators in promoting E-Learning in the workplace: a case from South Korea. Comput Hum Behav 28:942–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Yuen AHK, Ma WWK (2008) Teacher exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific J Teach Educ 36(3):229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zach O, Munkvold BE, Olsen DH (2012) ERP system implementation in SMEs: exploring the influences of the SME context. Enterp Inf Syst 8(2):309–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zahra SA, Covin JG (1995) Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis. J Bus Vent 10(1):43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business and Technology Management, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-701, Republic of Korea

    Junghwan Lee & Munkee Choi

  2. Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in IT Law, Dankook University, 152 Jukjeon-ro, Suji-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 448-701, Republic of Korea

    Hwansoo Lee

Authors
  1. Junghwan Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Munkee Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hwansoo Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hwansoo Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J., Choi, M. & Lee, H. Factors affecting smart learning adoption in workplaces: comparing large enterprises and SMEs. Inf Technol Manag 16, 291–302 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0201-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0201-5

Keywords