Skip to main content
Log in

The Complexity of Pure Literal Elimination

  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The computational complexity of eliminating pure literals is calibrated for various classes of CNF formulas. The problem is shown to be P-complete in general, NL-complete for 2-CNF, and SL-complete for CNF formulas with at most two occurrences of each variable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davis, M., Logemann, G. and Loveland, D. (1962) A machine program for theorem proving, Commun. ACM 5, pp. 394–397.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, E. and Novikov, Y. (2002) BerkMin: a fast and robust SAT-solver, in Design, Automation, and Test in Europe (DATE '02), pp. 142–149.

  • Greenlaw, R., Hoover, H. J. and Ruzzo, W. L. (1995) Limits to Parallel Computation, Oxford University Press.

  • Johannsen, J. (2004) Satisfiability problems complete for deterministic logarithmic space, in V. Diekert and M. Habib (eds.), 21st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2004), pp. 317–325.

  • Jones, N. D. (1975) Space bounded reducibility among combinatorial problems, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 11, pp. 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N. D., Lien, Y. E. and Laaser, W. T. (1976) New problems complete for nondeterministic log space, Math Syst. Theory. 10, pp. 1–17.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kullmann, O. (1999) New methods for 3-SAT decision and worst-case analysis, Theor. Comp. Sci. 223(1–2), pp. 1–72.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kullmann, O. (2002) Investigating the behaviour of a SAT solver on random formulas, Submitted.

  • Le Berre, D., Simon, L. and Tacchella, A. (2003) Challenges in the QBF arena: the SAT'03 evaluation of QBF solvers, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT2003), pp. 468–485, Springer LNCS 2919.

  • Letz, R. (2002) Lemma and model caching in decision procedures for quantified Boolean formulas, in U. Egly and C. G. Fermüller (eds.), TABLEAUX 2002, pp. 160–175.

  • Letz, R. (2004) personal communication.

  • Lewis, H. R. and Papadimitriou, C. H. (1982) Symmetric space-bounded computation, Theor. Comp. Sci. 19, pp. 161–187.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moskewicz, M. W., Madigan, C. F., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L. and Malik, S. (2001) Chaff: Engineering an efficient SAT solver, in Proceedings of the 38th Design Automation Conference (DAC'01).

  • Nisan, N. and Ta-Shma, A. (1995) Symmetric logspace is closed under complement, Chic. J. Theor. Comput. Sci.

  • Reingold, O. (2005) Undirected ST-connectivity in log-space, To appear in Proceedings of the 37th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing.

  • Schiermeyer, I. (1996) Pure literal lookahead: an O(1.497n) 3-satisfiability algorithm, in J. Franco, G. Gallo, H. Kleine Büning, E. Speckenmeyer and C. Spera (eds.), Workshop on the Satisfiability Problem.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johannsen, J. The Complexity of Pure Literal Elimination. J Autom Reasoning 35, 89–95 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-005-9008-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-005-9008-8

Key words

Navigation