Abstract
In the context of virtual database screening, calculations of protein-ligand binding entropy of relative and overall molecular motions are challenging, owing to the inherent structural complexity of the ligand binding well in the energy landscape of protein-ligand interactions and computing time limitations. We describe a fast statistical thermodynamic method for estimation the binding entropy to address the challenges. The method is based on the integration of the configurational integral over clusters obtained from multiple docked positions. We apply the method in conjunction with 11 popular scoring functions (AutoDock, ChemScore, DrugScore, D-Score, F-Score, G-Score, LigScore, LUDI, PLP, PMF, X-Score) to evaluate the binding entropy of 100 protein-ligand complexes. The averaged values of binding entropy contribution vary from 6.2 to 9.1 kcal/mol, showing good agreement with literature. We calculate positional sizes and the angular volume of the native ligand wells. The averaged geometric mean of positional sizes in principal directions varies from 0.8 to 1.4 Å. The calculated range of angular volumes is 3.3−11.8 rad2. Then we demonstrate that the averaged six-dimensional volume of the native well is larger than the volume of the most populated non-native well in energy landscapes described by all of 11 scoring functions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Taylor RD, Jewsbury PJ, Essex JW (2002) J Comput Aided Mol Des 16:151
Gohlke H, Klebe G (2002) Angew Chem Int Ed 41:2644
Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R (2002) Protein Struct Funct Bioinf 47:409
Brooijmans N, Kuntz I (2003) Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 32:335
Shoichet BK (2004) Nature 432:862
Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J (2004) Nat Rev Drug Discovery 3:935
Stockwell BR (2004) Nature 432:846
Cole JC, Murray CW, Nissink JWM, Taylor RD, Taylor R (2005) Prot Str Func Bioinf 60:325
Sousa SF, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ (2006) Prot Struct Funct Bioinf 65:15
Gilson MK, Given JA, Bush BL, McCammon JA (1997) Biophys J 72:1047
Gilson MK, Given JA, Head MS (1997) Chem Biol 4:87
Wang W, Donini O, Reyes CM, Kollman PA (2001) Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 30:211
Villa A, Zangi R, Pieffet G, Mark AE (2003) J Comput Aided Mol Des 17:673
Hermans J, Wang L (1997) J Am Chem Soc 119:2707
Essex JW, Severance DL, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL (1997) J Phys Chem B 101:9663
Bostrom J, Norrby PO, Liljefors T (1998) J Comp Aided Mol Des 12:383
Lee MS, Salsbury FR Jr, Brooks CL III (2002) J Chem Phys 116:10606
Baginski M, Fogolari F, Briggs JM (1997) J Mol Biol 274: 253
Luo H, Sharp K (2002) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 19:10399
Swanson JMJ, Henchman RH, McCammon JA (2004) Biophys J 86:67
Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ (1998) J Comput Chem 19:1639
Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R (1997) J Mol Biol 267:727
Ewing TJA, Makino S, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID (2001) J Comput Aided Mol Des 15:411
Cerius2, version 4.6; Accelrys Inc.; http: www.accelrys.com
Gehlhaar DK, Verkhivker GM, Rejto PA, Sherman CJ, Fogel DB, Fogel LJ, Freer ST (1995) Chem Biol 2:317
Böhm HJ (1994) J Comput Aided Mol Des 8:243
Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T, Klebe G (1996) J Mol Biol 261:470
Eldridge MD, Murray CW, Auton TR, Paolini GV, Mee RP (1997) J Comput Aided Mol Des 11:425
Wang R, Lai L, Wang S (2002) J Comput Aided Mol Des 16:11
Muegge I, Martin YC (1999) J Med Chem 42:791
Gohlke H, Hendlich M, Klebe G (2000) J Mol Biol 295:337
Ruvinsky AM, Kozintsev AV (2005) Prot Str Func Bioinf 58:845
Bissantz C, Folkers G, Rognan D (2000) J Med Chem 43:4759
Verkhivker GM, Bouzida D, Gehlhaar DK, Rejto PA, Arthurs S, Colson AB, Freer ST, Larson V, Luty BA, Marrone T, Rose PW (2000) J Comput Aided Mol Des 14:731
Wang R, Lu Y, Wang S (2003) J Med Chem 46:2287
Ferrara P, Gohlke H, Price DJ, Klebe G, Brooks CL III (2004) J Med Chem 47:3032
Warren GL, Andrews CW, Capelli AM, Clarke B, LaLonde J, Lambert MH, Lindvall M, Nevins N, Semus SF, Senger S, Tedesco G, Wall ID, Woolven JM, Peishoff CE, Head MS (2006) J Med Chem 49:5912
Leach AR, Shoichet BK, Peishoff CE (2006) J Med Chem 49:5851
Ajay, Murcko MA, Stouten PFW (1997) In: Charifson PS (eds) Practical application of computer-aided drug design. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 355–411
Murray CW, Verdonk ML (2002) J Comp-Aided Mol Des 16:741
Murray CW, Verdonk ML (2006) In: Jahnke W, Erlanson DA, Mannhold R, Kubinyi H, Folkers G (eds), Fragment-based approaches in drug discovery. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA, Weinheim, pp 55-66
Pratt LR, Chandler D (1977) J Chem Phys 67:3683
Shoichet BK, Leach AR, Kuntz ID (1999) Prot Str Funct Bio 34:4
Steinberg IZ, Scheraga HA (1963) J Biol Chem 283:172
Erickson HP (1989) J Mol Biol 206:465
Finkelstein AV, Janin J (1989) Prot Eng 3:1
Ben-Tal N, Honig B, Bagdassarian CK, Ben-Shaul A (2000) Biophys J 79:1180
Yu YB, Privalov PL, Hodges RS (2001) Biophys J 81:1632
Ruvinsky AM, Kozincev AV (2005) J Comput Chem 26:1089
Ruvinsky AM (2007) J Comput Chem 28:1364
Page MI, Jencks WP (1971) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:1678
Levitt M, Sander C, Stern PS (1985) J Mol Biol 181:423
Tidor B, Karplus M (1994) J Mol Biol 238:405
Doig AJ, Sternberg MJE (1995) Prot Sci 4:2247
Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL (2006) J Med Chem 49:5880
Baker BM, Murphy KP (1996) Biophys J 71:2049
Bradshaw JM, Waksman G (1998) Biochem 37:15400
Karplus M, Janin J (1999) Prot Eng 12:185
Lazaridis T, Masunov A, Gandolfo F (2002) Prot Str Func Bioinf 47:194
Minh DDL, Bui JM, Chang CE, Jain T, Swanson JM, McCammon JA (2005) Biophys J 89:L25
Balog E, Becker T, Oettl M, Lechner R, Daniel R, Finney J, Smith JC (2004) Phys Rev Lett 93:028103
Lee SA, Rupprecht A, Chen YZ (1998) Phys Rev Lett 80:2241
Leach AR (ed) (1996) Molecular modelling: principles and applications. Longman, Harlow, p 382
Luo R, Gilson MK (2000) J Am Chem Soc 122:2934
Carlsson J, Åqvist J (2005) J Phys Chem B 109:6448
Verkhivker GM, Bouzida D, Gehlhaar DK, Rejto PA, Freer ST, Rose PW (2002) Curr Opin Struct Biol 12:197
Ruvinsky AM, Kozincev AV (2006) Prot Str Funct Bioinf 62:202
Källblad P, Mancera RL, Todorov NP (2004) J Med Chem 47:3334
Kortvelyesi T, Silberstein M, Dennis S, Vajda S (2003) J Comp Aided Mol Des 17:173
Rosenfeld RJ, Goodsell DS, Musah RA, Morris GM, Goodin DB, Olson AJ (2003) J Comp-Aid Mol Des 17:525
Tovchigrechko A, Vakser IA Prot Sci, 10 (2001) 1572; Ruvinsky AM, Vakser IA, submitted (2007)
Kozakov D, Clodfelter KH, Vajda S, Camacho CJ (2005) Biophys J 89:867
Wales DJ (2005) Phys Biol 2:S86
Wales DJ, Scheraga HA (1999) Science 285:1368
Price MLP, Jorgensen WL (2000) J Am Chem Soc 122:9455
Head MS, Given JA, Gilson MK (1997) J Phys Chem A 101:1609
Schaffer L, Verkhivker G (1998) Protein Struct Funct Genet 33:295
Straub JE (1996) In: Elber R (eds) New Developments in Theoretical Studies of Proteins. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 137
Frauenfelder H, Wolynes PG, Austin RH (1999) Rev Mod Phys 71:S419
Straub JE, Thirumalai D (1993) Proc Natl Acad Sci 90:809
Kitao A, Hayward S, Go N (1998) Prot Str Func Genet 33:496
Shortle D, Simons KT, Baker D (1998) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:11158
Kubo R (ed) (1988) Statistical mechanics: an advanced course with problems and solutions. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam, p 200
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
This appendix derives the partition functions of overall and relative rotational motions. It follows the method described by Kubo [83]. The Hamiltonian of a rotator is
where I 1, I 2, I 3 are the principal moments of inertia of the molecular; (θ, φ, ψ) are Euler angles of rotational motions; (p θ, p φ, p ψ) are the corresponding canonical conjugate moments. The classical formula for the partition function of free rotations is
where σ is the order of symmetry of the molecule; \({\hbar}\) is the Planck’s constant. The Hamiltonian in Eq. (12) can be rewritten as
Substituting Eq. (14) into Eq. (13) and using the Gaussian integral formula
we can perform the integrations over the canonical conjugate moments in Eq. (13). Integration over p θ gives
Integration over p φ gives
Integration over p ψ gives
Eqs. (16, 17, 18) and (13) yield the partition function as
The sine of the polar angle in Eq. (19) appears as a result of integrations over the canonical conjugate moments. Thus, the partition function of restricted relative rotations is proportional to
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruvinsky, A.M. Calculations of protein-ligand binding entropy of relative and overall molecular motions. J Comput Aided Mol Des 21, 361–370 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-007-9116-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-007-9116-0