Abstract
A new approach is presented that combines structure- and ligand-based virtual screening in a reverse way. Opposite to the majority of the methods, a docking protocol is first employed to prioritize small ligands (“fragments”) that are subsequently used as queries to search for similar larger ligands in a database. For a given chemical library, a three-step strategy is followed consisting of (1) contraction into a representative, non-redundant, set of fragments, (2) selection of the three best-scoring fragments docking into a given macromolecular target site, and (3) expansion of the fragments’ structures back into ligands by using them as queries to search the library by means of fingerprint descriptions and similarity criteria. We tested the performance of this approach on a collection of fragments and ligands found in the ZINC database and the directory of useful decoys, and compared the results with those obtained using a standard docking protocol. The new method provided better overall results and was several times faster. We also studied the chemical diversity that both methods cover using an in-house compound library and concluded that the novel approach performs similarly but at a much smaller computational cost.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shuker SB, Hajduk PJ, Meadows RP, Fesik SW (1996) Discovering high-affinity ligands for proteins: SAR by NMR. Science 274(5292):1531–1534
Hajduk PJ, Greer J (2007) A decade of fragment-based drug design: strategic advances and lessons learned. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6(3):211–219. doi:10.1038/nrd2220
Lipinski C, Hopkins A (2004) Navigating chemical space for biology and medicine. Nature 432(7019):855–861. doi:10.1038/nature03193
Hann MM, Leach AR, Harper G (2001) Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41(3):856–864. doi:10.1021/ci000403i
Schuffenhauer A, Ruedisser S, Marzinzik AL, Jahnke W, Blommers M, Selzer P, Jacoby E (2005) Library design for fragment based screening. Curr Top Med Chem 5(8):751–762
Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK (2005) ZINC—a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 45(1):177–182. doi:10.1021/ci049714+
Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ (2001) Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 46(1–3):3–26
Huang N, Shoichet BK, Irwin JJ (2006) Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. J Med Chem 49(23):6789–6801. doi:10.1021/jm0608356
Perez C, Ortiz AR (2001) Evaluation of docking functions for protein-ligand docking. J Med Chem 44(23):3768–3785
PDB IDs 1GPK, 1HWW, 1IA1, 1JD0, 1J3J, 1HNN, 1HQ2, 1IG3, 1K3V, 1LRH, 1N1M, 1N2V, 1OF1, 1OF6, 1OWE, 1P2Y, 1P62, 1Q1G, 1Q41, 1Q4G, 1R9O, 1SG0, 1SQW, 1TOW, 1TT1, 1TZ8, 1UIC, 1U4D, 1UOU, 1W1P, 1W2G, 1X8X, and 1XM6
Hartshorn MJ, Verdonk ML, Chessari G, Brewerton SC, Mooij WT, Mortenson PN, Murray CW (2007) Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance. J Med Chem 50(4):726–741. doi:10.1021/jm061277y
Weininger D (1988) SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 28(1):31–36. doi:10.1021/ci00057a005
Open Babel (2011) The open source chemistry toolbox. http://openbabel.org/wiki/Main_Page. Accessed 01 March 2012
Corina (2000) Computerchemie Langemarckplatz 1 E, Germany, MNG
Stewart JJP (1990) MOPAC: a semiempirical molecular orbital program. J Comput Aided Mol Des 4(1):1–103. doi:10.1007/bf00128336
Case DA, Cheatham TE III, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM Jr, Onufriev A, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26(16):1668–1688. doi:10.1002/jcc.20290
Gil-Redondo R (2006) Master thesis UNED, Madrid
Dolinsky TJ, Nielsen JE, McCammon JA, Baker NA (2004) PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson–Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res 32(Web Server issue):W665–W667. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh381
Murray CW, Baxter CA, Frenkel AD (1999) The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase. J Comput Aided Mol Des 13(6):547–562
Steinbeck C, Han Y, Kuhn S, Horlacher O, Luttmann E, Willighagen E (2003) The chemistry development kit (CDK): an open-source Java library for chemo- and bio-informatics. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43(2):493–500. doi:10.1021/ci025584y
Voigt JH, Bienfait B, Wang S, Nicklaus MC (2001) Comparison of the NCI Open Database with Seven Large Chemical Structural Databases. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41(3):702–712. doi:10.1021/ci000150t
Schneider G, Neidhart W, Giller T, Schmid G (1999) “Scaffold–Hopping” by topological pharmacophore search: a contribution to virtual screening. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 38(19):2894–2896
Sandor M, Kiss R, Keseru GM (2010) Virtual fragment docking by Glide: a validation study on 190 protein-fragment complexes. J Chem Inf Model 50(6):1165–1172. doi:10.1021/ci1000407
Verdonk ML, Giangreco I, Hall RJ, Korb O, Mortenson PN, Murray CW (2011) Docking performance of fragments and druglike compounds. J Med Chem 54(15):5422–5431. doi:10.1021/jm200558u
Lin FY, Tseng YJ (2011) Structure-based fragment hopping for lead optimization using predocked fragment database. J Chem Inf Model 51(7):1703–1715. doi:10.1021/ci200136j
Moriaud F, Doppelt-Azeroual O, Martin L, Oguievetskaia K, Koch K, Vorotyntsev A, Adcock SA, Delfaud F (2009) Computational fragment-based approach at PDB scale by protein local similarity. J Chem Inf Model 49(2):280–294. doi:10.1021/ci8003094
Durrant JD, Friedman AJ, McCammon JA (2011) CrystalDock: a novel approach to fragment-based drug design. J Chem Inf Model 51(10):2573–2580. doi:10.1021/ci200357y
Cabrera AC, Gil-Redondo R, Perona A, Gago F, Morreale A (2011) VSDMIP 1.5: an automated structure- and ligand-based virtual screening platform with a PyMOL graphical user interface. J Comput Aided Mol Des 25(9):813–824. doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9465-6
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN) BIO2008-04384 (to Antonio Morreale) and SAF2009-13914-C02-02 (to Federico Gago), and Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (CAM) S-BIO-0214-2006 (BIPEDD) and S2010-BMD-2457 (BIPEDD-2). Antonio Morreale acknowledges CAM for financial support to the Fundación Severo Ochoa through the AMAROUTO program. Álvaro Cortés-Cabrera thanks Ministerio de Educación for the FPU Grant AP2009-0203. We are grateful to OpenEye Scientific Software, Inc. for providing us with an academic license for their software. The technical support and advice from the Bioinformatics team at CBMSO is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cortés-Cabrera, Á., Gago, F. & Morreale, A. A reverse combination of structure-based and ligand-based strategies for virtual screening. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26, 319–327 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-012-9558-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-012-9558-x