Abstract
The evaluation of the scaffold hopping potential of computational methods is of high relevance for virtual screening. For benchmark calculations, classes of known active compounds are utilized. Ideally, such classes should have a well-defined content of structurally diverse scaffolds. However, in reported benchmark investigations, the choice of activity classes is often difficult to rationalize. To provide a compendium of well-characterized test cases for the assessment of scaffold hopping potential, structural distances between scaffolds were systematically calculated for compound classes available in the ChEMBL database. Nearly seven million scaffold pairs were evaluated. On the basis of the global scaffold distance distribution, a threshold value for large scaffold distances was determined. Compound data sets were ranked based on the proportion of scaffold pairs with large distances they contained, taking additional criteria into account that are relevant for virtual screening. A set of 50 activity classes is provided that represent attractive test cases for scaffold hopping analysis and benchmark calculations.






Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schneider G, Neidhart W, Giller T, Schmid G (1999) Angew Chem Int Ed 19:2894
Schneider G, Schneider P, Renner S (2006) QSAR Comb Sci 25:1162
Brown N, Jacoby E (2006) Mini Rev Med Chem 6:1217
Hu Y, Bajorath J (2010) Med Chem Commun 1:339
Vogt M, Stumpfe D, Geppert H, Bajorath J (2010) J Med Chem 53:5707
Geppert H, Vogt M, Bajorath J (2010) J Chem Inf Model 50:205
Stumpfe D, Bajorath J (2011) In Sotriffer C (ed) Applied virtual screening: strategies, recommendations, and caveats. Methods and principles in medicinal chemistry. Virtual screening. Principles, challenges, and practical guidelines. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, p 73
Hu Y, Stumpfe D, Bajorath J (2011) J Chem Inf Model 51:1742
Li R, Stumpfe D, Vogt M, Geppert H, Bajorath J (2011) J Chem Inf Model 51:2507
Gaulton A, Bellis LJ, Bento AP, Chambers J, Davies M, Hersey A, Light Y, McGlinchey S, Michalovich D, Al-Lazikani B, Overington JP (2012) Nucleic Acids Res 40:D1100
ChEMBL (2012) http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembldb/
Bemis GW, Murcko MA (1996) J Med Chem 39:2887
MACCS (2002) Structural keys. Symyx Software, San Ramon
Rogers D, Hahn M (2010) J Chem Inf Model 51:742
Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK (2005) J Chem Inf Model 51:177
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, R., Bajorath, J. Systematic assessment of scaffold distances in ChEMBL: prioritization of compound data sets for scaffold hopping analysis in virtual screening. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26, 1101–1109 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-012-9603-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-012-9603-9