Skip to main content
Log in

A single spiking neuron that can represent interval timing: analysis, plasticity and multi-stability

  • Published:
Journal of Computational Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability to represent interval timing is crucial for many common behaviors, such as knowing whether to stop when the light turns from green to yellow. Neural representations of interval timing have been reported in the rat primary visual cortex and we have previously presented a computational framework describing how they can be learned by a network of neurons. Recent experimental and theoretical results in entorhinal cortex have shown that single neurons can exhibit persistent activity, previously thought to be generated by a network of neurons. Motivated by these single neuron results, we propose a single spiking neuron model that can learn to compute and represent interval timing. We show that a simple model, reduced analytically to a single dynamical equation, captures the average behavior of the complete high dimensional spiking model very well. Variants of this model can be used to produce bi-stable or multi-stable persistent activity. We also propose a plasticity rule by which this model can learn to represent different intervals and different levels of persistent activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbieri, F., & Brunel, N. (2008). Can attractor network models account for the statistics of firing during persistent activity in prefrontal cortex? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2, 114–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buhusi, C., & Meck, W. (2002). Differential effects of methamphetamine and haloperidol on the control of an internal clock. Behavioral Neuroscience, 116, 291–297.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Compte, A., Constantinidis, C., Tegner, J., Raghavachari, S., Chafee, M., Goldman-Rakic, P., et al. (2003). Temporally irregular mnemonic persistent activity in prefrontal neurons of monkeys during a delayed response task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 3441–3454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daoudal, G., & Debanne, D. (2003). Long-term plasticity of intrinsic excitability: Learning rules and mechanisms. Learning and Memory, 10(6), 456–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durstewitz, D. (2003). Self-organizing neural integrator predicts interval times through climbing activity. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5342–5353.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durstewitz, D. (2004). Neural representation of interval time. Neuroreport, 15, 745–749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egorov, A., Hamam, B., Fransén, E., Hasselmo, M., & Alonso, A. A. (2002). Graded persistent activity in entorhinal cortex neurons. Nature, 420, 173–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, E., Alonso, A., & Hasselmo, M. E. (2002). Simulations of the role of the muscarinic-activated calcium-sensitive nonspecific cation current incm in entorhinal neuronal activity during delayed matching tasks. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 1081–1097.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, E., Tahvildari, B., Egorov, A., Hasselmo, M., & Alonso, A. A. (2006). Mechanism of graded persistent cellular activity of entorhinal cortex layer v neurons. Neuron, 49, 735–746.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gavornik, J., & Shouval, H. (2010). A network of spiking neurons that can represent interval timing: Mean field analysis. Journal of Computational Neuroscience. doi:10.1007/s10827-010-0275-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavornik, J. P., Shuler, M. G., Loewenstein, Y., Bear, M. F., & Shouval, H. Z. (2009). Learning reward timing in cortex through reward dependent expression of synaptic plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(16), 6826–6831.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman-Rakic, P. (1995). Cellular basis of working memory. Neuron, 14, 477–485.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, S., Guzma’n, G., Wissenbach, U., Philipp, S., Zhu, M. X., Bruns, D., et al. (2009). TRPC5 is a Ca2-activated channel functionally coupled to Ca2-selective ion channels. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 284, 34423–34432.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Lopez, S., Tkatch, T., Perez-Garci, E., Galarraga, E., Bargas, J., Hamm, H., et al. (2000). D2 dopamine receptors in striatal medium spiny neurons reduce l-type ca2+ currents and excitability via a novel plc[beta]1-ip3-calcineurin-signaling cascade. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 8987–8995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D., & Wu, S.-S. (1994). Foundations of cellular neurophysiology. MIT Press.

  • Loewenstein, Y., & Sompolinsky, H. (2003). Temporal integration by calcium dynamics in a model neuron. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 961–967.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matell, M., Bateson, M., & Meck, W. (2006). Single-trials analyses demonstrate that increases in clock speed contribute to the methamphetamine-inducedhorizontal shifts in peak-interval timing functions. Psychopharmacology, 188, 201–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauk, M., & Buonomano, D. (2004). The neural basis of temporal processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 307–340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meck, W. (1996). Neuropharmacology of timing and time perception. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 227–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saar, D., & Barkai, E. (2003). Long-term modifications in intrinsic neuronal properties and rule learning in rats. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 2727–2734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shalinsky, M., Magistretti, J., Ma, L., & Alonso, A. (2002). Muscarinic activation of a cation current and associated current noise in entorhinal-cortex layer-ii neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 1197–1211.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shuler, M., & Bear, M. (2006). Reward timing in the primary visual cortex. Science, 311, 1606–1609.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staddon, J., Higa, J., & Chelaru, I. (1999). Time, trace, memory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 293–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Surmeier, D. J., Bargas, J., Hemmings, H. J., Nairn, A., & Greengard, P. (1995). Modulation of calcium currents by a d1 dopaminergic protein kinase/phosphatase cascade in rat neostriatal neurons. Neuron, 14, 385–397.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. (2001). Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 455–463.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harel Z. Shouval.

Additional information

Action Editor: Nicolas Brunel

Appendices

Appendix

A Calcium dynamics and their analysis

The calcium current in this model arises from high threshold calcium channels, which move to an open state only when the neuron spikes and return to closed rapidly after the end of the action potential (rapidly means much faster that τ Ca).

We simulate these calcium channels using the simple linear expression, instead of the GHK (Johnston and Wu 1994) equation for simplicity:

$$ I_{\rm Ca}=g_{\rm Ca}(V-E_{\rm Ca}) $$
(19)

where V is the postsynaptic potential, E Ca the reversal potential for calcium, where g Ca is governed by the dynamical equation:

$$ \tau_{\rm gca}\dot g_{\rm Ca}=-g_{\rm Ca}+H_{\rm Ca}(V,\theta,m) $$
(20)

where H Ca describes the voltage dependence of the calcium channels. Typically we use a hill function with a threshold θ and a hill coefficient m. However since τ gca < < τ Ca and since voltage changes are rapid as well, the calcium flows in during a very short period, and can be approximated as a step change in calcium levels.

This step is the total amount of calcium transferred through these channels during a single AP, which we define as ρ. The parameter ρ is a function the calcium channel parameters, such as it’s maximal conductance and it’s time time constant. With this definition and the step approximation Eqs. (1 and 1920) can be replaced by a single equation of the form:

$${d{\rm Ca}\over dt}=-{1\over \tau_{\rm Ca}}{\rm Ca}+\rho\sum\limits_i^n\delta(t-t_i) $$
(21)

where t i are spike times, and t n  < t. In our simulations we calculate ρ from simulations of the detailed calcium dynamics by integrating over the total current generated by a single action potential. We find by comparing the simulations with the detailed dynamics and simulations with the step approximation that this approximation leads only to minor quantitative differences.

If the postsynaptic neuron fires at a fixed frequency f with a corresponding inter spike interval Δt = 1/f, so that t i  = iΔt we get that:

$${\rm Ca}(t)=e^{-t/\tau_{\rm Ca}}\rho{1-a^{n+1}\over 1-a} $$
(22)

where \(a=\exp(-\Delta t/\tau_{\rm Ca})\). Defining t  = t − nΔt, the time since the last spike we get that:

$${\rm Ca}\left(t^\prime\right)=e^{-t^\prime\over \tau_{\rm Ca}}\rho {{e^{-n\Delta t\over \tau_{\rm Ca}}-e^{\Delta t\over \tau_{\rm Ca}}} \over 1-e^{\Delta t\over \tau_{\rm Ca}}} $$
(23)

for larger n this is approximated by

$${\rm Ca}\left(t^\prime\right)\approx e^{-t^\prime/ \tau_{\rm Ca}}\rho{{{e^{\Delta t\over \tau_{\rm Ca}}}}\over {1-e^{\Delta t\over \tau_{\rm Ca}}} } $$
(24)

which can be rewritten as:

$${\rm Ca}\left(t^\prime\right)= \exp\left(-t^\prime/ \tau_{\rm Ca}\right){\rm Ca}^0(f) $$
(25)

where, Ca0(f) is the value of calcium shortly after a spike.

$${\rm Ca}^0(f) =\rho{\exp(1/f\tau_{\rm Ca})\over {\exp(1/f\tau_{\rm Ca})-1}} $$
(26)

By averaging over a single inter-spike interval we get:

$${\overline{\rm Ca}} = {\rm Ca}^0(f)*\left(1-{\rm exp}(-1/f\tau_{\rm Ca})\right)\tau_{\rm ca}f=\rho\tau_{\rm Ca}\cdot f $$
(27)

If we replace Eq. (21) by the equation:

$${d{\rm Ca}\over dt}=-{1\over \tau_{\rm Ca}}{\rm Ca}+\rho f . $$
(28)

we obtain at steady state the same expression as in Eq. (27). Equation (28) is the same as Eq. (3).

B Parameters

Note the parameter ρ is calculated inside the code by integrating the calcium dynamics for a single postsynaptic spike and finding the max of the calcium transient. It depends on the parameters V theta, E Ca, m, and also on the properties of the action potential. Here we assume that action potential are exponentials with a hight of 100 mV and a width of 1 ms. We measure everything here with respect, to the reversal potential. So the cell voltage relaxes back to zero (rather then approximately − 65 mV). All potentials are therefore measured with respect to this shifted zero.

Table 1 Parameters used in the model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shouval, H.Z., Gavornik, J.P. A single spiking neuron that can represent interval timing: analysis, plasticity and multi-stability. J Comput Neurosci 30, 489–499 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-010-0273-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-010-0273-0

Keywords