Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Through-Silicon-Via (TSV) Void/Pinhole Defect Self-Test Methods

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three methods have been proposed to test Through-Silicon-Vias (TSV) electrically prior to 3D integration. These test methods are (1) sense amplification; (2) leakage current monitor; and (3) capacitance bridge methods. These tests are aimed at detecting one or both of two failure types, pin-holes and voids. The test circuits measure capacitance and leakage current of the TSVs, and generate a 1 bit pass/fail signal. The outputs are streamed out through a scan chain. The test time is 10 μs for the leakage test and the sense amplification methods, and is 15 μs for the capacitive bridge method. All these methods can be implemented for test-before-stacking, which will increase assembled yield. Resolution, power and area of these TSV test circuits were compared. The performance of each circuit was studied at PVT corners. The IMEC TSV technology was assumed, and the designs were simulated using the 32 nm predicted device model. Without any failure, the TSV capacitance’s mean value is 37 fF, and its leakage resistance is higher than 850 MΩ. With respect to 37 fF standard capacitance, resolution for the sense amplification method is 3.3 fF (8.9%); it is 0.16 fF (0.4%) for the capacitance bridge method. Although the capacitance bridge method has relatively better resolution, it takes 4x area and 10x power than the other two, and is also more sensitive to PVT variation. Resolution of the leakage current monitor method is 10 MΩ (1.1%) with respect to its threshold 850 MΩ, and use 42.5aJ power in normal case. Sense amplification circuit can be modified to detect equivalent leakage resistance under 2KΩ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen DY, Chiou WC, Chen MF et al (2009) Enabling 3D-IC foundry technologies for 28 nm node and beyond: through-silicon-via integration with high throughput die-to-wafer stacking, IEDM 2009

  2. Chen P-Y, Wu C-W, Kwai D-M (2009) On-chip TSV testing for 3D IC before bonding using sense amplification, Asian Test Symposium 2009, Page 450

  3. Holmberg P (1995) Automatic balancing of linear AC bridge circuits for capacitive sensor elements. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 44(3):803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu C (2001) BSIM model for circuit design using advanced technologies, Symposium on VLSl Circuits 2001

  5. Huang Z, Chatterjee R, Justison P et al (2008) Electromigration of Cu-Sn-Cu micropads in 3D interconnect, Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2008, Page 12

  6. Kang U, Chung H-J, Heo S et al (2009) 8Gb 3D DDR3 DRAM using through-silicon-via technology, ISSCC 2009, Session 7 (2)

  7. Kim T-Y, Kim T (2010) Clock tree synthesis with pre-bond testability for 3D stacked IC designs, DAC 2010, Page 723

  8. Kim B, Sharbono C, Ritzdorf T, Schmauch D (2006) Factors affecting copper filling process within high aspect ratio deep vias for 3D chip stacking, Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2006, Page 838

  9. Lau JH. TSV manufacturing yield and hidden costs for 3D IC integration, 2010 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Page 1031

  10. Loi I, Mitra S, Lee TH, Fujita S, Benini L (2008) A low-overhead fault tolerance scheme for TSV-based 3D network on chip links, ICCAD 2008, Page 598

  11. Nomura K, Abe K, Fujita S, Kurosawa Y, Kageshima A (2010) Performance analysis of 3D-IC for multi-core processors in sub-65 nm CMOS technologies, ISCAS 2010 Page 2876–2879

  12. Putter BM (2008) On-chip RC measurement and calibration circuit using Wheatstone bridge, ISCAS 2008, Page 1496

  13. Seo S-W, Park J-H, Seo M-S, Kim G-S (2009) The electrical, mechanical properties of through-silicon-via insulation layer for 3D ICs, ICEPT-HDP 2009, Page 64

  14. Tsai M, Klooz A, Leonard A, Appel J, Franzon P (2009) Through silicon via(TSV) defect/pinhole self test circuit for 3D-IC, 3DIC 2009

  15. Van der Plas G, Limaye P, Mercha A et al (2010) Design issues and considerations for low-cost 3D TSV IC technology, ISSCC 2010 Session 7(8)

  16. Velenis D, Stucchi M, Marinissen EJ, Swinnen B, Beyne E (2009) Impact of 3D design choices on manufacturing cost, 3DIC 2009

  17. Woo DH, Seong NH, Lewis DL, Lee H­HS (2010) An optimized 3D­stacked memory architecture by exploiting excessive, high­density TSV bandwidth, HPCA 2010

  18. Yang Y, Katti G, Labie R et al (2010) Electrical evaluation of 130-nm MOSFETs with TSV proximity in 3D-SIC structure, International Interconnect Technology Conference (IITC)

  19. Yasufuku T, Ishida K, Miyamoto S et al (2009) Effect of resistance of TSV’s on performance of boost converter for low power 3D SSD with NAND flash memories, 3DIC 2009

  20. Zhao W, Cao Y (2006) New generation of predictive technology model for sub-45 nm early design exploration. IEEE Transactions On Electron Devices 53(11)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul D. Franzon.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: E.J. Marinissen

Yi Lou, Zhuo Yan and Fan Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lou, Y., Yan, Z., Zhang, F. et al. Comparing Through-Silicon-Via (TSV) Void/Pinhole Defect Self-Test Methods. J Electron Test 28, 27–38 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-011-5261-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-011-5261-4

Keywords

Navigation