Skip to main content
Log in

Distributed Scan Like Fault Detection and Test Optimization for Digital Microfluidic Biochips

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Development of digital microfluidic biochips (DMFB) has faced a major setback from the threats of faulty and erroneous fluidic operations. Defective electrodes are the main reason for this misleading assay performance. It also affects the assay completion time and overall turnaround time. In this present article, a fast fault diagnosis mechanism is discussed to identify the defective locations of electrode array. The proposed fault detection method is governed by a distributed dispensing and scheduling of test droplets on a 2-D biochip. Water droplets are strategically routed across the DMFB board and quantified at every location using cost effective photodiode sensors. Multiple test droplets are routed on the chip in a time synchronized manner to avoid any routing conflict or failure in diagnosis. This concurrent test droplet circulation incurs optimum layover period and parallel and multiple test droplet movement enhances the fault detection performance. Completeness of the fault analysis is ensured with a sequential post processing as well. Test results of this approach have recorded some substantial improvement in terms of fault detection time and accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chakrabarty K (2010) Design automation and test solutions for digital microfluidic biochips. IEEE TCAS I 57(1):4–17

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Y, Khwa WSV, Yu MHV (2010) Fault detection and fault tolerant design for microfluidic based biochips. Proc of EIASC. 1–8

  3. Cho SK, Fan SK, Moon H, Kim CJ (2002) Towards digital microuidic circuits: creating, transporting, cutting and merging liquid droplets by electrowetting-based actuation. Proc MEMS. 32–35

  4. Datta S, Joshi B, Ravindran A, Mukherjee A (2009) Efficient parallel testing and diagnosis of digital microfluidic biochips. ACM J Emerg Technol Comput Syst 5(2):10.1–10.17, Article 10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu K, Hsu BN, Madison A, Chakrabarty K; Fair RB (2013) Fault detection, real time error recovery and experimental demonstration for digital microfluidic biochips. Proc Des Autom Test Eur. 559–564

  6. Itai A, Papadimitriou CH, Szwarcfiter JL (1982) Hamiltonian paths in grid graphs. SIAM J Comput 11:676–686

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo Y, Chakrabarty K, Ho TY (2013) Error recovery in cyberphysical digital microfluidic biochips. IEEE Trans Comput-Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 32(1):59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Majumder M (2012) A novel single-fault detection technique of digital microfluidic biochip. Int J Comput Sci Its Applications [ISSN 2250–3765], VI – I-1(16);92–95

  9. Mitra D, Ghoshal S, Rahaman H, Chakrabarty K, Bhattacharya BB (2011) Test planning in digital microfluidic biochips using efficient eulerization techniques. J Electron Test 27(5):657–671

  10. Mitra D, Ghoshal S, Rahaman H, Chakrabarty K, Bhattacharya BB (2012) Online error detection in digital microfluidic biochips. Proc IEEE 21st Asian Test Symposium. 332–337

  11. Pollock M, Shenderov AD, Fair RB (2002) Electrowetting-based actuation of droplets for integrated microfluidics. Lab Chip 2(2):96–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roy P, Rahaman H, Gupta P, Dasgupta P (2013) A new customized testing technique using a novel design of droplet motion detector for digital microfluidic biochip systems. Proc. ICACCI. 897–902

  13. Schulte TH, Bardell RL, Weigl BH (2002) Microfluidic technologies in clinical diagnostics. Clin Chim Acta 321:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Su F, Chakrabarty K (2006) Defect tolerance based on graceful degradation and dynamic reconfiguration for digital microfluidics based biochips. IEEE Trans Comput-Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 25(12):2944–2953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Su F, Chakrabarty K, Fair RB (2006) Microfluidics-based biochips: technology issues, implementation platforms, and design automation challenges. IEEE Trans Comput-Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 25(2):265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Su F, Hwang W, Mukherjee A, Chakrabarty K (2005) Defect oriented testing and diagnosis of digital microfluidics based biochips. Proc Int Test Conf 21(2):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  17. Su F, Hwang W, Mukherjee A, Chakrabarty K (2007) Testing and diagnostics of realistic defects in digital microfluidic biochips. J Electron Testing: Theory and Applications 23:219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Su F, Ozev S, Chakrabarty K (2003) Testing of droplet-based microelectrofluidic systems. Proce IEEE Int Test Cong 1:1192–1200

  19. Wang WC, Yee S, Reinhall P (1995) Optical viscosity sensor using forward light scattering. Sensors Actuators B 25:753–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu T, Chakrabarty K (2007) Parallel scan-like test and multiple defect diagnosis for digital microfluidic biochips. IEEE Trans on Biomedical Circuit and Systems 1(2):148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu T, Chakrabarty K (2008) Integrated droplet routing and defect tolerance in the synthesis of digital microfluidic biochips. ACM J Emerg Technol Comput Syst 4(3):11.1–11.24, Article – II

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhamita Mukherjee.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: K. Chakrabarty

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukherjee, S., Samanta, T. Distributed Scan Like Fault Detection and Test Optimization for Digital Microfluidic Biochips. J Electron Test 31, 311–319 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-015-5525-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-015-5525-5

Keywords

Navigation