Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Sizing and Scaling on Power Dissipation and Resilience of an RHBD SRAM Circuit

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single Event Transients (SET) pose a growing challenge to reliability of memory circuits as the device dimensions continue to shrink. It is essential to assess the effect of decreasing technology lengths on the resilience and power dissipation of the circuit. This paper proposes Dual Interlocked Storage Cell (DICE) based Radiation Hardened by Design (RHBD) Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) circuit design with appropriate sizing ratios for 180 nm, 90 nm and 45 nm channel lengths. The effect of variation in voltage in these technology nodes is analysed by a comparison of power dissipation calculated through simulations on Cadence. For an input voltage of 1.1 V, the power dissipation is calculated as 0.175nW for 180 nm technology length, 0.086nW for 90 nm technology length and 0.018nW for 45 nm technology length. It shows that the power dissipation gets almost halved when the technology switch is made from 180 nm to 90 nm and the power dissipation decrease is almost ten times from 180 nm to 45 nm technology. Mobility and doping parameters are found to be varying with device dimensions and the magnitude of that variation is studied. The parameters are related with the vulnerability to SET and affect the circuit’s resilience to radiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

This manuscript has no associated data.

References

  1. Govind Prasad BC, Mandi, Ali M (2021) Low power and write-enhancement RHBD 12T SRAM cell for aerospace applications. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 107:377–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-020-01786-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Muthu BR, Ewins P, Pushpa VD, Kamala J, Hemalatha V, Oh W-C, Suresh S (2022) “Design and Analysis of Soft Error Rate in FET/CNTFET Based Radiation Hardened SRAM Cell” Sensors 22(1):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010033. Suresh Sagadevan1

  3. Bohr MT, Ian A, Young (2017) CMOS Scaling Trends and Beyond. IEEE Micro 37:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kobayashi D (2021) “Scaling Trends of Digital Single-Event Effects: A Survey of SEU and SET Parameters and Comparison With Transistor Performance,“. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 68(2):124–148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2020.3044659

  5. Moore GE (1965) “Cramming more components onto integrated circuits, Reprinted from Electronics, volume 38, number 8, April 19, pp.114 ff.,“ IEEE Solid-State Circuits Society Newsletter, 11(3):33–35, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/N-SSC.2006.4785860

  6. Moore G (1975) Progress in Digital Integrated Electronics, IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, pp.11–13

  7. Dennard R, Gaensslen F, Rideout V, Bassous E, LeBlanc A (1974) Design of ion-implanted MOSFET’s with very small physical dimensions. Solid-State Circuits IEEE Journal of 9:256–268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008373903657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shekhar B (1999) Design Challenges of Technology Scaling, IEEE Micro, Volume 19, Issue 4 (1999), pp. 23–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/40.782564

  9. Singh J, Mohanty S, Pradhan D (2012) Robust SRAM designs and analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/9781461408185

  10. Gasiot G, Giot D, Roche P (2007) Multiple cell upsets as the key contribution to the total SER of 65 nm CMOS SRAMs and its dependence on well engineering, The 44th Annual International Nuclear Space and Radiation Effects Conference (NSREC), Honolulu, HI, July

  11. Calin T, Nicolaidis M, Velazco R (1996) Upset hardened memory design for submicron CMOS technology. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 43:2874–2878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fragasse R, Tantawy R, Dupaix B, Dean T, DiSabato D, Belz M, Smith D, McCue J, Khalil W (2019) Analysis of SRAM Enhancements Through Sense Amplifier Capacitive Offset Correction and Replica Self-Timing. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2019.2902102

  13. Sunil Jadav, Chandel R (2019) High performance 9T adiabatic SRAM and novel stability characterization using pole zero placement, Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 98(2):347–355, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-018-1308-0

  14. Yadav N, Jadav S (2014) Efficient energy recovery in 9T adiabatic SRAM cell using body bias. Int J VLSI Embedded Syst 05:778–784

    Google Scholar 

  15. Takeda K, Hagihara Y, Aimoto Y, Nomura M, Nakazawa Y, Ishii T, Kobatake H (2006) A read-static-noise-margin-free SRAM cell for low-VDD and high-speed applications. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 41:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sinangil ME, Poulton JW, Fojtik MR, Greer TH, Tell SG, Gotterba AJ, Wang J, Golbus J, Zimmer B, Dally WJ, Gray CT (2016) A 28 nm 2 Mbit 6 T SRAM With Highly Configurable Low-Voltage Write-Ability Assist Implementation and Capacitor-Based Sense-Amplifier Input Offset Compensation. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 51:557–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibe E, Taniguchi H, Yahagi Y, Shimbo K, Toba T (2010) Impact of Scaling on Neutron-Induced Soft Error in SRAMs From a 250 nm to a 22 nm Design Rule. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 57:1527–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lilja K, Bounasser M, Wen SJ, Wong R, Holst J, Gaspard N, Jagannathan S, Loveless D, Bhuva B (2013) Single-Event Performance and Layout Optimization of Flip-Flops in a 28-nm Bulk Technology. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 60(4):2782–2788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Satheesh S, Kumaravel S (2019) “Design and Analysis of SEU Hardened Latch for Low Power and High Speed Applications”. J Low Power Electron Appl 9(3):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jlpea9030021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dohar SS, Siddharth RK, Vasantha MH, Kumar YBN (May 2021) A 1.2V highly reliable RHBD 10T SRAM cell for aerospaceapplication. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 68(5):2265–2270

  21. Rathod SS, Saxena AK, Dasgupta S (2012) Analysis of double-gate FinFET-based address decoder for radiation induced single-event-transients, IET Circuits, Devices & Systems, 6(4):218–226

  22. Izumi S, Yamashita K, Nakano M, Kawaguchi H, Kimura H, Marumoto K, Fuchikami T, Fujimori Y, Nakajima H, Shiga T, Yoshimoto M (2014) A Wearable Healthcare System With a 13.7 micron Noise Tolerant ECG Processor. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems. 9. 10.1109/TBCAS.2014.2362307

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neha Pannu.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflict of interest. This research received no external funding.

Additional information

 Responsible Editor: B. Ghavami

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pannu, N., Prakash, N.R. & Kaur, J. Effect of Sizing and Scaling on Power Dissipation and Resilience of an RHBD SRAM Circuit. J Electron Test 38, 579–587 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-022-06036-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-022-06036-5

Keywords

Navigation