Abstract
While much has changed in product modularity research in the 18 years since the independence axiom, some basic questions remain unanswered. Perhaps the most fundamental of those questions is whether increasing modularity actually saves money. The goal of the research behind this paper was to clearly define the fundamental relationship between product modularity and product cost. Our previous work in modular product design provided a complete package of a product modularity measure and a modular design method. The “best” measure was created and verified after correcting common performance problems among the seven measures, finally subtracting the averaged relationships external to modules from the averaged relationship within modules. After comparing and finding better design elements among four representative modular design methods, the “best” method was developed that includes product decomposition, multi-component reconfiguration and elimination, and an extended limiting factor identification. The “best” method/measure package quickly yields redesign products with higher modularity. To seek out relationships between product life-cycle modularity and product life-cycle cost, modular product design experiments were implemented for four off-the-shelf products using the new measure/method package applied to increase both functional and retirement modularity. The modularity data recorded for each redesign included retirement modularity, manufacturing modularity and assembly modularity. Each redesign’s life-cycle cost was also obtained based on several classical cost models. The cost data recorded for each redesign included retirement cost, manufacturing cost, and assembly cost. The best relationships came from the retirement viewpoint. However, there is not a significant relationship between any life-cycle modularity and any life-cycle cost unless there are significantly large modularity changes. Life-cycle modularity-cost relationships are more likely to exist in data pools generated from that life-cycle redesign viewpoint. The beginning of modular redesign, where greater modularity improvements are seen, is more effective at reducing costs. Cost savings depend the appropriateness of the modularity matrix’s product architecture representation from a cost savings viewpoint.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boothroyd G., Dewhurst P., Knight W. (1994) Product design for assembly and manufacture. Marcel Dekker, New York
Chang, T. S., & Ward, A. C. (1995). Design-in-modularity with conceptual robustness. Proceedings of the 1995 ASME design technical conferences – 21st design automation conference, September, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chen, W., Navin-Chandra, D., & Prinz, F. B. (1993). Product design for recyclability: A cost benefit analysis model and its application. Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE conference, pp. 178–183.
Chen, W., Rosen, D., Allen, J. K., & Mistree, F. (1994). Modularity and the independence of functional requirements in designing complex systems. Proceedings of the 1994 ASME design technical conferences – conference on concurrent product design, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Coulter, S. L., Bras, B., McIntosh, M. W., & Rosen, D. W. (1998). Identification of limiting factors for improving design modularity. Proceedings of the 1998 ASME design engineering technical conferences – 10th international conference on design theory and methodology, September, Atlanta, Georgia.
Gershenson J.K., Prasad G.J., Allamneni S. (1999) Modular product design: A life-cycle view. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 3(4): 13–26
Gershenson J.K., Prasad G.J., Zhang Y. (2003) Product modularity: Definitions and benefits. Journal of Engineering Design 14(3): 295–313
Graedel T.E., Allenby B.R. (1995) Industrial ecology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
Guo, F., & Gershenson, J. K. (2005). A measure of product modularity: Comparison, selection, improvement, and verification. under review for the Journal of Mechanical Design.
Guo, F., & Gershenson, J. K. (2005). A modular design method: Comparison, selection, improvement, and verification, under review for the Journal of Mechanical Design.
Gurumurthy, J. P. (1998). Life-cycle modularity in product design. M.S. Thesis, University of Alabama.
He D.W., Kusiak A. (1996) Performance analysis of modular products. International Journal of Product Research 34(1): 253–272
Hillstrom, F. (1994). Applying axiomatic design to interface analysis in modular product development. Advances in Design Automation, DE-Vol. 69–2, 363–371.
Hopwood, K. (1995). Modularity transforms manufacturing. Electronic Engineering Times, August, pp. 72.
Huang, C.-C., & Kusiak, A. (1998). Modularity in design of products and systems. 6th Industrial engineering research conference proceedings.
Ishii K. (1995) Life-cycle engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Engineering - Transactions of the ASME 117: 42–47
Ishii, K., & Lee, B. (1996). Reverse fishbone diagram: A tool in aid of design for product retirement. Proceedings of the 1996 ASME design engineering technological conferences −1st design for manufacturing conference, August, Irvine, CA.
Ishii K., Eubanks C.F., Dimarco P. (1994) Design for product retirement and material life-cycle. Materials and Design Journal 15(2): 225–233
Ishii, K., Juengel, C., & Eubanks, C. F. (1995). Design for product variety: Key to product line structuring. Proceedings of the 1995 ASME design technical conferences - 9th international conference on design theory and methodology, September, Boston, Massachusetts.
Klausner M., Grimm W.M., Hendrickson C. (1998) Reuse of electric motors in consumer products: Design and analysis of an electronic data log. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(2): 89–102
Kusiak A., Chow W.S. (1987) Efficient solving of group technology problem. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 6(2): 117–124
Marshall, R., Leaney, P. G., & Botterell, P. (1998). Enhanced product realization through modular design: An example of product/process integration. Proceedings of the SDPS/ASME/IEEE third world conference on integrated design and process technology, Berlin, Germany, 3(4), 143–150, ISSN 1090-9389.
Newcomb P.J., Bras B., Rosen D.W. (1996) Implications of modularity on product design for the life cycle. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 120(3): 483–490
Pimmler, T. U., & Eppinger, S. D. (1994). Integration analysis of product decompositions. Proceedings of the 1994 ASME design engineering technical conferences - 6th international conference on design theory and methodology, September, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Siddique, Z., Rosen, D. W., & Wang, N. (1998). On the applicability of product variety design concepts to automotive platform commonality. Proceedings of 1998 ASME design engineering technical conferences - 10th international conference on design theory and methodology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sosa, M. E., Eppinger, S. D., & Roales, C. M. (2000). Designing modular and integrative systems. Proceedings of the 2000 ASME design technical conferences – 14th international conference on design theory and methodology, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sosale, S., Hashemian, M., & Gu, P. (1997). Product modularization for reuse and recycling. Concurrent product design and environmentally conscious manufacturing ASME 1997, DE-Vol. 94/MED-Vol. 5.
Stone, R. B., Wood, K. L., & Crawford, R. H. (1998). A Heuristic method to identify modules from a functional description of a product. Proceedings of 1998 ASME design engineering technical conferences - 10th international conference on design theory and methodology, September, Atlanta, Georgia.
Stone R.B., Wood K.L., Crawford R.H. (2000) A Heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures. Design Studies 21(1): 5–31
Stone, R. B., Wood, K. L., & Crawford, R. H. (1999). Product architecture development with quantitative functional models. Proceedings of 1999 ASME, design engineering technical conferences - 11th international conference on design theory and methodology, September, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy (Vol. 24). the Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
Ulrich, K., & Tung, K. (1991). Fundamentals of product modularity. Proceedings of the 1991 ASME design technical conferences - conference on design / manufacture integration, September, Miami, Florida, pp. 73–79.
Zhang, Y., Gershenson, J. K., & Allamneni, S. (2001). Determining relationships between modularity and cost in product retirement. Proceedings of 2001 design engineering technical conferences 13th international conference on design theory and methodology, September, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Zhang Y., Gershenson J.K. (2003) An initial study of direct relationships between life-cycle modularity and life-cycle cost. Journal of Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications 11(3): 121–128
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, F., Gershenson, J.K. Discovering relationships between modularity and cost. J Intell Manuf 18, 143–157 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0007-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0007-y