Skip to main content
Log in

A systematic approach for supply chain improvement using design structure matrix

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supply chain is a complex system that involves many system elements from various functional areas. Performance of a supply chain heavily depends on the effectiveness of communication and coordination among these system elements and functional areas. However, a large and complex supply chain usually makes it difficult to coordinate and thus degrades its performance. This paper focuses on the development of a systematic approach with the following objectives: (1) to identify and quantify the interactions among the system elements in a supply chain; (2) to decompose the large interdependent group of system elements into smaller and manageable sub-groups; and thus (3) to improve the structure of the supply chain system. A supply chain system is first decomposed into subsystems and system elements from which the interactions (i.e., independent, dependent and interdependent relationships) are studied and documented by design structure matrix (DSM). Next, the interaction strengths among the related system elements are quantified. Cluster analysis is used to decompose the large interdependent group into smaller ones in order to provide a better supply chain system structure. The effectiveness of this systematic approach is demonstrated by an illustrative example. The result shows that it is able to improve the system structure of a supply chain that will be useful for the supply chain reengineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander C. (1964) Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiru A.B., Pulat P.S. (1995). Comprehensive project management: Integrating optimization models, management principles, and computers. Prentice Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamon B.M. (1998). Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods. International Journal of Production Economics, 55(3): 281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burley, H. (2002). Supply chain modeling: An overview of practice and methodology. Business Research Papers, University of Southern Queens Land, 22–35.

  • Carmel E. (1994). Time-to-completion in software package startups. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on System Sciences, 4: 498–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetinkaya S., Bookbinder J.H. (2003). Stochastic models for the dispatch of consolidated shipments. Transportation Research Part B, 37(8): 747–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra P., Fisher M.L. (1994). Coordination of production and distribution planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 72(1): 503–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra C. (2001). Enterprise architectural framework for supply-chain integration. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 101(5): 290

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, W. Y., Guinan, P. J. (1994). Effects of participative management. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCPR Conference, 252–260.

  • Chopra S. (2003). Designing the distribution network in a supply chain. Transportation Research Part E, 39(2): 123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S.J., Lin L. (2002). A project task coordination model for team organization in concurrent engineering. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 10(3): 187–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen S.-J., Lin L. (2003). Decomposition of interdependent task group for concurrent engineering. Computers Industrial Engineering, 44: 435–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu C.-H. (1989). Cluster analysis in manufacturing cellular formation. OMEGA, 17(3): 289–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark K.B., Wheelwright S.C. (1992). Organizing and leading “heavyweight” development teams. California Management Review, 34(3): 9–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen M.A., Lee H.L. (1989). Resource deployment analysis of global manufacturing and distribution networks. Journal of Manufacturing Operations Management, 15(2): 81–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M.C., Ellram L.M., Gardner J.T., Hanks A.M. (1997a). Meshing multiple alliances. Journal of Business Logistics, 18(1): 67–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M.C., Lambert D.M, Pagh J.D. (1997b). Supply chain management: More than a new name for logistics. International Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1): 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S.K., Abdel-Malek L. (2003). Modeling the flexibility of order quantities and lead-times in supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(2): 171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran B. S., Odell P.L. (1974). Cluster analysis: A survey. Springer, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger, S. D., Whitney, D. E., Smith, R. P., Gebala, D. (1990). Organizing the tasks in complex design projects. ASME: Design Theory and Methodology, Chicago, IL, 39–46.

  • Everitt B. (1980). Cluster analysis. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Garavelli A. (2003). Flexibility configurations for the supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(2): 141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon A.D. (1981). Classification: Methods for the exploratory analysis of multivariate data. Chapman and Hall, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan J.A. (1975). Clustering algorithms. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D., Johnson F. (1991). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Prentice Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak A. (1990). Intelligent manufacturing systems. Prentice-Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak A., Wang J. (1993). Efficient organizing of design activities. International Journal of Production Research,31(4):753–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan M.J. (1994). Task estimating: Completion time versus team Size. Engineering Management Journal, 4(5): 212–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy W.S. (1992). Rationalizing the design process. Proceedings of the Design Management Conference, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA, CA.

  • McCord, K. R., Eppinger, S. D. (1993). Managing the integration problem in concurrent engineering. MIT Working paper 3594.

  • O’Neil B.F., Iveson J.L. (1992). Strategically managing the logistics function. Logistics and Transportation Review, 27(4): 359–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsmats C.M.G., Edghill J.S., Towill D.R. (1988). Industrial dynamics model building of a close-coupled production-distribution system. Engineering Costs and Production Economics, 13(1): 295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimmler, T.U, Eppinger, S. D. (1994). Integration analysis of product decompositions. ASME: Design Theory and Methodology. Minneapolis, MN.

  • Romano P. (2003). Coordination and integration mechanisms to manage logistics processes across supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(3): 119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott J.M., Mauricio P., Farris J.F., Kirk R.G. (2003). Integrating the warehousing and transportation functions of the supply chain. Transportation Research Part E, 39(2): 141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith R.P., Eppinger S.D. (1997a). Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration. Management Science, 43: 276–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R.P., Eppinger S.D. (1997b). A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design. Management Science, 43: 1104–1120

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan M., Moon Y.B. (1999). Comprehensive clustering algorithm for strategic analysis of supply chain networks. Computers Industrial Engineering, 36(3): 615–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steward D.V. (1981). The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 28(1): 71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock G.N., Greis N.P., Kasarda J.D. (2000). Enterprise logistics and supply chain structure: The role of fit. Journal of Operations Management, 18(5): 531–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supply Chain Council. (1996). Supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Overview of SCOR Version 5.0.

  • Tsay A.A. (1999). Quality flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Management Science, 45(10): 1339–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich K.T., Eppinger S.D. (1995). Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan H., Yu Z., Cheng T.C.E. (2003). A strategic model for supply chain design with logical constraints: Formulation and solution. Computers and Operations Research, 30(14): 2135–2155

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shi-Jie (Gary) Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

(Gary) Chen, SJ., Huang, E. A systematic approach for supply chain improvement using design structure matrix. J Intell Manuf 18, 285–299 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0022-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0022-z

Keywords

Navigation