Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new multi-agent system framework for tacit knowledge management in manufacturing supply chains

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participating members in a manufacturing supply chain (MSC) usually make use of individual knowledge for making independent decisions. Recent research, however, indicates that there is a need to handle such distributed knowledge in an integrated manner, especially under uncertain and fast changing environments. A multiagent system (MAS), a branch of distributed artificial intelligence, is a contemporary modelling technique for a distributed system like MSCs in the manufacturing domain. However recent researches indicate that MAS approaches have not adequately addressed the role of sharing tacit knowledge (TK) on MSC performance. This paper, therefore, aims to propose a framework that utilizes MAS techniques with a corresponding TK sharing mechanism dedicated to MSCs. We performed some experiments to simulate the proposed approach. The results showed significant improvements when comparing the proposed approach with another conventional MAS model. The results establish a starting point for researchers interested in enhancing MSC performance using TK management approach, and for managers of MSC to focus on the essentials of sharing TK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson E. and Fine C. (1999). Business cycles an productivity in capital equipment chains. In: Tayur, S. (eds) Quantitative models for MSC management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib C. and Rossi F. (2000). Optimal resource assignment through negotiation in a multi-agent manufacturing system. IIE Transactions 32(10): 963–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Armistead C.G. and Mapes J. (1993). The Impact of MSC Integration on Operating Performance. Logistics Information Management 6: 9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arntzen B.C., Brown G.C., Harrison T.P. and Trafton L.L. (1995). Global supply chain management at Digital Equipment Corporation. Interfaces 25(1): 69–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamon B.M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 19(3): 275–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskaran S. (1998). Simulation analysis of a manufacturing MSC. Decision Sciences 29(3): 633–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner W., Zarnekow R. and Wittig H. (1998). Intelligent software agents: Foundations and applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessemer process. (2008). In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved June 11, 2008, from Encyclopædia Britannica Online: http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9078935.

  • Camm J., Chorman F., Dill J., Evans D., Sweeney G. and Wegryn T. (1997). Blending OR/MS, judgment, and GIS: Restructuring P&G’s MSC. Interfaces 27(1): 128–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiaanse E. and Venkatraman N. (2002). Beyond sabre: An empirical test of expertise exploitation in electronic channel. MIS Quarterly 26(1): 15–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M.C., Ellram L.M., Gardner J.T. and Hanks A.M. (1993). Characteristics of supply chain management and the implications for purchasing and logistics strategy. The International Journal of Logistics Management 4(2): 13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M.C. and Ellram L.M. (1997). Meshing multiple alliances. Journal of Business Logistics 18(1): 67–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal T.E. and Kennedy A.A. (1982). Cultures: A new look through old lenses. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 19: 487–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertogral K. and Wu S.D. (2000). Auction-theoretic coordination of production planning in the MSC. IIE Transactions 32(10): 931–940

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan M., Stallaert J. and Whinston A.B. (2003). Decentralized mechanism design for MSC organizations using an auction market. Information System Research 14(1): 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox M.S., Barbuceanu M. and Teigen R. (2000). Agent oriented supply-chain management. The international Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 12: 165–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., Piplani, R., Souza, R., & Wu, J. (2000). Multi-agent enabled modeling and simulation towards collaborative inventory management in MSC. Proceedings of the 32nd conference on Winter simulation, December 10–13, 2000, Orlando, Florida (pp. 1763–1771), Society for Computer Simulation International.

  • Gardner J. and Cooper M.C. (1988). Elements of strategic partnership. In: McKeon, J.E. (eds) Partnerships: A natural evolution in logistics, pp 15–32. Logistics Resources, Inc., Cleveland, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerdrum J., Shah N. and Papageorgiou L.G. (2001). A combined optimisation and agent-based approach to MSC modelling and performance assessment. Production Planning and Control 12(1): 81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkkanen A., Kalakota R., Saengcharoenrat P., Stallaert J. and Whinston A.B. (1997). Distributed decision support systems for real time MSC management using agent technologies. In: Kalakota, R. and Whinston, A.B. (eds) Readings in electronic commerce, pp 275–291. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth D.S. (1988). Building successful global partnerships. Journal of Business Strategy 9(September–October): 12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaihara T. (2001). MSC management with market economics. International Journal Production Economics 73(1): 5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H.L. and Billington C. (1993). Material management in decentralized supply chains. Operations Research 41(5): 835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L., & Feitzinger, E. (1995). Product configuration and postponement for supply chain efficiency. In Fourth Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Institute of Industrial Engineers.

  • Lin G., Ettl M., Buckley S., Bagchi S., Yao D.D. and Naccarato B.L. (2000). Extended-enterprise supply-chain management at IBM personal systems group and other divisions. Interfaces 30(1): 7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer J.T., DeWitt W., Keebler J.S., Min S., Nix N.W. and Smith C.D. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics 22(21): 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller T. (2001). Hierarchical operations and supply chain planning. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Min H. and Zhou G. (2002). MSC modeling: Past, present and future. Computers and Industrial Engineering 43(1–2): 231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely A., Gregory M. and Platts K. (1995). Performance measurement system design. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15(4): 80–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I. and Takeuchi H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen S.A., Divitini M. and Matsken M. (2001). An agent based approach to modelling virtual enterprises. Production Planning and Control 12(3): 224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, R. G., & Peng, B. (2004). Cultural algorithms: Modeling of how cultures learn to solve problems. In 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2004), Boca Raton, FL, USA: IEEE Computer Society.

  • Sadeh N.M., Hildum D.W., Kjenstad D. and Tseng A. (2001). MASCOT: An agent-based architecture for coordinated mixed-initiative MSC planning and scheduling. Production Planning and Control 12(3): 212–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein E.H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear S. and Bowen H.K. (1999). Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System. Harvard Business Review 77(5): 96–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Star S. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Heterogeneous problem-solving, boundary Objects and distributed artificial intelligence. In: Gasser, H. (eds) Distributed artificial intelligence Vol. 2, pp 37–54. Morgan Kauffmann, Menlo Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan J.M., Smith S.F. and Sadeh N.M. (1998). Modeling MSC dynamics: A multi-agent approach. Decision Science 29(3): 607–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian G.Y. and Yin G. (2002). Internet-based manufacturing: A review and a new infrastructure for distributed intelligent manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 13(5): 323–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VICS Committee on CPFR (2001). Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment, White paper. Retrieved November 15, 2007, http://www.vics.org/apps/group_public/download.php/26/CPFR_in_Brazil.pdf.

  • Voudouris V.T. (1996). Mathematical programming techniques to de-bottleneck the supply chain of fine chemical industries. Computers and Chemical Engineering 20: S1269–S1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber Y., Shenkar O. and Raveh A. (1996). National & corporate culture fit in mergers/acquisitions: An exploratory study. Management Sciences 42(8): 1215–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whicker M. and Sigelman L. (1991). Computer simulation applications: An introduction. Sage Publications, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambonelli F., Jennings N.R. and Wooldridge M. (2003). Developing multiagent systems: The Gaia methodology. ACM Transaction Software Engineering 12(3): 317–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman A. (2002). MSC management. Capstone Pub- lishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clayton School of Information Technology, Monash University, Victoria, 3800, Australia

    Khalid Al-Mutawah, Vincent Lee & Yen Cheung

Authors
  1. Khalid Al-Mutawah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vincent Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yen Cheung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalid Al-Mutawah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Mutawah, K., Lee, V. & Cheung, Y. A new multi-agent system framework for tacit knowledge management in manufacturing supply chains. J Intell Manuf 20, 593–610 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0142-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0142-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation