Skip to main content
Log in

Leveraging technological knowledge transfer by using fuzzy linear programming technique for multiattribute group decision making with fuzzy decision variables

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the importance of knowledge transfer for firms involved in foreign direct investment activities, this area has not received appropriate attention from the perspectives of both the knowledge transferor (i.e., MNC parent) and the knowledge recipient. To fill in the gap in the current literature we propose a model to understand the links between criteria complicating the transfer of knowledge and preferences that the company has to focus. This model is based on both the existing literature as well as views of company representatives and provides a useful methodology for identifying decision making problems on the transfer of knowledge. In this paper, we investigate the fuzzy linear programming technique (FLP) to analyze these links and for multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems with preference information on criteria. To reflect the decision maker’s subjective preference information and to determine the weight vector of attributes, the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) developed by Hwang and Yoon (1995) and the linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP) developed by Sirinivasan and Shocker (Psychometrica 38:337–369, 1973) are used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida P., Kogut B. (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science 45: 905–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote L., Ingram P. (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82(1): 150–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C., Schon D.A. (1978) Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorkman I., Schaap A. (1994) Outsiders in the middle kingdom: Expatriate managers in Chinese-western joint ventures. European Management Journal 12(2): 147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C.T. (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child J., Faulkner D. (1998) Strategies of cooperation: Managing alliances, networks, and joint ventures. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective of learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport T.H., Prusak L. (1998) Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinur, A., Inkpen, A. C., & Hamilton, R. D. (1998). Knowledge transfer in the multinational corporation. In Paper presented at the Academy of International Business, Vienna, Austria.

  • Fan S.-K.S., Liang Y.-C., Zahara E. (2004) Hybrid simplex search and particle swarm optimization for the global optimization of multimodal functions. Engineering Optimization 36: 401–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R. (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38(1): 85–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A.K., Govindarajan V. (1991) Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review 16(4): 768–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A.K., Govindarajan V. (2000) Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 21: 473–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakanson, L., & Nobel, R. (1998). Technology characteristics and reverse technology transfer. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of International Business, Vienna, Austria.

  • Hamel G. (1991) Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal 12: 83–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C.-L., & Chen, S.-J. (1992). Fuzzy attribute decision making: Methods and applications. In Collaboration with F.P. Hwang. Berlin: Springer.

  • Hwang, C. L., & Lin, M. J. (1987). Group decision making under multiple criteria, Lecture notes in economics and mathematics system (Vol. 281). Berlin: Springer.

  • Hwang C.-L., Yoon K.P. (1995) Multiple attribute decision making: An introduction. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane P.J., Lubatkin M. (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal 19: 461–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane P.J., Salk J.E., Lyles M.A. (2001) Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal 22: 1139–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei D.C., Slocum J.W. Jr., Pitts R.A. (1997) Building cooperative advantage: Managing strategic alliances to promote organizational learning. Journal of World Business 32(3): 203–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D.F., Yang J.B. (2004) Fuzzy linear programming technique for multiattribute group decision making in fuzzy environments. Information Sciences 158: 263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles M.A., Salk J.E. (1996) Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: An empirical examination in the Hungarian context. Journal of International Business Studies 27(5): 877–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E., Romeo A. (1980) Technology transfer to overseas subsidiaries by US based firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 95(4): 737–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreland R.L., Levine J.M., Wingert M.L. (1996) Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In: Witte E.H., Davis J.H. (eds) Understanding group behavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations Vol. 2. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 11–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I. (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge. Organization Science 5: 14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J. (2002) From know-how to show-how? Questioning the role of information and communication technologies in knowledge transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 12(9): 429–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross T.J. (1995) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirinivasan V., Shocker A. D. (1973) Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences. Psychometrica 38(3): 337–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender J.-C. (1996) Making knowledge the basis of the dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17: 45–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck W.H. (1992) Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies 29: 713–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G. (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(Summer special issue): 27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang E.W.K. (2001) Managerial learning in foreign-invested enterprises of China. Management International Review 41: 29–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman M.L. (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly 22: 587–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Laarhoven P.J.M., Pedrycz W. (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11: 229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P., Tong T.W., Koh C.P. (2004) An integrated model of knowledge transfer from MNC parent to China subsidiary. Journal of World Business 39: 168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y.M., Parkan C. (2005) Multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives: Ranking and weighting. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 153: 331–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3): 338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zand D.E. (1972) Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly 17(2): 229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, U. (1991). Exploiting a technological edge: Voluntary and involuntary dissemination of technology (p. 182). Stockholm: Institute of International Business.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Esra Albayrak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albayrak, Y.E., Erensal, Y.C. Leveraging technological knowledge transfer by using fuzzy linear programming technique for multiattribute group decision making with fuzzy decision variables. J Intell Manuf 20, 223–231 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0220-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0220-3

Keywords

Navigation