Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Managing diagrammatic models with different perspectives on product information

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of engineering-oriented companies, a basic distinction can be made between the information needed during sales, engineering and manufacturing. When representing such information in diagrammatic models, these models will most often include both individual and shared content. For instance, during the sales phase, information about sales prices may be relevant, while this information is not relevant in the engineering and manufacturing phases, where, on the other hand, more detailed information about components and assembly is needed. However, such information models often share basic component definitions. Having this overlapping information across models means that when maintaining these, redundant work has to be carried out for the overlapping parts of the information. This, obviously, can be both time-consuming and a significant source of errors. In this paper, a modelling method for the management of diagrammatic models with different perspectives on product information is proposed. The aim of this method is to avoid redundant information across models, in order to reduce time needed for ensuring of consistency across models and minimize the chances of errors. The need for information models with different perspectives on the same product information is common in cases that involve design/redesign of complex products and/or the construction of product configurators. Besides a knowledge representation technique, the paper suggests two different solutions for software support, of which the application of one of these in an actual project is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreasen, M. M. (1980). Machine design methods based on a systematic approach. PhD thesis, Lund Technical University, Lund, Sweden.

  • Andreasen, M. M. (1992). The theory of domains. In Proceedings from workshop on understanding function and function-to-form evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.

  • Andreasen, M. M., Hansen, C. T., & Mortensen, N. H. (1997). On the identification of product structure laws. In Proceedings of the 3rd WDK workshop on product structuring. Delft, Holland: Delft University of Technology.

  • Andreasen, M. M., McAloone, T., & Mortensen, N. H.(2001). Multi-product development—platforms and modularization. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.

  • Ardissono L., Felfernig A., Friedrich G., Goy A., Jannach D., Petrone G. et al (2003) A framework for the development of personalized, distributed web-based configuration systems. AI Magazine 24(3): 93–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C., Putnam R., Smith D.M. (1985) Action science. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin C.Y., Clark K.B. (1997) Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review 75(5): 84–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceron R., Arciniegas J.L., Ruiz J.L., Duenas J.C., Bermejo J., Capilla R. (2004) Architectural modelling in product family context. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3047: 25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K., Hvam, L., Pedersen, J. L., Møldrup, M., & Møller, N. (2005). Udvikling og implementering af konfigureringssystemer: økonomi, teknologi og organisation [Developement and implementation of configurators: economy, technology and organization] (Report from PETO research project). Lyngby, Denmark: Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Management, Technical University of Denmark.

  • Eynard B., Gallet T., Nowak P., Roucoules L. (2004) UML based specifications of PDM product structure and workflow. Computers in Industry 55(3): 301–316. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2004.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felfernig A., Friedrich G.E., Jannach D. (2000) UML as domain specific language for the construction of knowledge-based configuration systems. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 10(4): 449–469. doi:10.1142/S0218194000000249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher M., Ramdas K., Ulrich K. (1999) Component sharing in the management of product variety: A study of automotive braking systems. Management Science 45(3): 297–315. doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.3.297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forza C., Salvador F. (2002) Managing for variety in the order acquisition and fulfilment process: The contribution of product configuration systems. International Journal of Production Economics 76(1): 87–98. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00157-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forza C., Salvador F. (2007) Product information management for mass customization. Palgrave MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler M. (2005) UML distilled: A brief guide to the standard object modeling language (3rd eds). Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. L. (2003). Development of industrial variant specification systems. PhD thesis, Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Management, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

  • Hansen C.T., Andreasen M.M. (2002) Two approaches to synthesis based on the domain theory. In: Chakrabarti A. (eds) Engineering design synthesis. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 93–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlou, U. (2006). Developing product families base on architectures—contribution to a theory of product families. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

  • Haug, A. (2007). Representation of industrial knowledge—as a basis for developing and maintaining product configurators. PhD thesis, Department of Industrial Management and Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

  • Haug, A. (2008). Cognition of retrieved product information in configuration projects. In Proceedings of the joint conference IMCM’08 & PETO’08 on mass customization services. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.

  • Haug A., Hvam L. (2007) A comparative study of two graphical notations for the development of product configuration systems. International Journal of Industrial Engineering 14(2): 107–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, A., & Hvam, L. (2007b). Product structured class diagrams to support the development of product configuration systems. In Proceedings of MCPC 2007. Boston, MA: MIT.

  • Haug, A., Lisbjerg, T., & Hvam, L. (2009). A software system for the management of generic product information models. In Proceedings of NordPLM’09. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology.

  • Hubka V., Eder W.E. (1988) Theory of technical systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hvam, L. (2004). A multi-perspective approach for the design of Product Configuration Systems—an evaluation of industry applications. In Proceedings of the international conference of economic, technical and organizational aspects of product configuration systems (pp. 13–25). Lyngby, Denmark: Department of Industrial Management and Engineering; Technical University of Denmark.

  • Hvam L., Mortensen N.H., Riis J. (2008) Product customization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak A. (2002) Integrated product and process design: A modularity perspective. Journal of Engineering Design 13(3): 223–231. doi:10.1080/09544820110108926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi S., Lello A.D. (2001) Product modularity theory and practice: The benefits and difficulties in implementation within a company. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 1(4): 425–448. doi:10.1504/IJATM.2001.000050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, N. H. (1999). Design modelling in a designers workbench. PhD Thesis, Department of Control and Engineering Design, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

  • Mortensen, N. H., Yu, B., Skovgaard, H., & Harlou, U. (2000). Conceptual modeling of product families in configuration projects. In Proceedings of the 14th European conference on artificial intelligence, configuration workshop. Berlin: Humboldt University.

  • Männistö T., Peltonen H., Soininen T., Sulonen R. (2001) Multiple abstraction levels in modelling product structures. Data & Knowledge Engineering 36(1): 55–78. doi:10.1016/S0169-023X(00)00034-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, J. (1992). Concurrent development in manufacturing—based on dispositional mechanisms. PhD Thesis, Department of Control and Engineering Design, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

  • OMG. (2005). Unified modeling language: Superstructure, Version 2.0. Object Management Group. http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/05-07-04.pdf

  • Osteras T., Murthy D.N.P., Rausand M. (2006) Product performance and specification in new product development. Journal of Engineering Design 17(2): 177–192. doi:10.1080/09544820500275735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabin D., Weigel R. (1998) Product configuration frameworks—a survey. IEEE Intelligent Systems & Their Applications 13(4): 42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador F., Forza C., Rungtusanatham M. (2002) Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: Theorizing beyond generic prescriptions. Journal of Operations Management 20(5): 549–575. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00027-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susman G.I., Evered R.D. (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly 23((4): 582–603. doi:10.2307/2392581

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entrepreneurship and Relationship Management, University of Southern Denmark, Engstien 1, 6000, Kolding, Denmark

    Anders Haug

Authors
  1. Anders Haug
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Haug.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haug, A. Managing diagrammatic models with different perspectives on product information. J Intell Manuf 21, 811–822 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0257-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0257-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation