Skip to main content
Log in

DeviceNet network health monitoring using physical layer parameters

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1980s, the manufacturing environment has seen the introduction of numerous sensor/actuator bus and network protocols for automation systems, which led to increased manufacturing productivity, improved inter- changeability of devices from different vendors, facilitated flexibility and reconfigurability for various applications and improved reliability, while reducing installation and maintenance costs. However, such heightened manufacturing integration facilitated by industrial networks also leads to dramatic consequences of improper or degraded network operation. This paper presents a novel Network Health Management system that provides diagnostic and prognostic information for DeviceNet at the device and network level. It extracts features from analog waveform communication signals, as well as logic and timing features from digital packet logs. These features are used to evaluate the network system performance degradation by applying multidimensional clustering techniques. In addition, this work proposes a hybrid prognostics structure using combined physical and logic layer features to provide fault location information that cannot easily be realized with analog or digital data independently. Furthermore, an intermittent connection diagnostic algorithm which analyzes patterns of interrupted and error packets on the network was developed. This tool can be used as a packet source identification method which uses joint analog features and digital information inferred from analog waveforms. A test-bed was constructed and the experiments of network impedance mismatch, cable degradation, and intermittent connections were conducted in laboratory environment. Experimental results show that the proposed system can detect degradations of the network and identify the location of the intermittent connection successfully. Field tests performed in an industrial environment were also conducted and their results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cauffriez, L., Conrard, B., Thiriet, J., & Bayart, M. (2003). Fieldbuses and their influence on dependability. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE instrumentation and measurement technology conference (Vol. 1, pp. 83–88).

  • Cena G., Durante L., Valenzano A. (1995) Standard field bus networks for industrial applications. Computer Standards & Interfaces 17(2): 155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cenesiz N., Esin M. (2004) Controller area network (CAN) for computer integrated manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 15(4): 481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corno, F., Perez, J., Ramasso, M., Reorda, M. S., & Violante, M. (2004). Validation of the dependability of CAN-based networked systems. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE high-level design validation and test workshop (pp. 161–164).

  • Djurdjanovic D., Lee J., Ni J. (2003) Watchdog agent—an infotronics-based prognostics approach for product performance degradation assessment and prediction. Advanced Engineering Informatics 17(3–4): 109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duda R. O., Hart P. E., Stork D. G. (2000) Pattern classification. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges, J.-P., Rondeau, E., & Divoux, T. (2002). Evaluation of switched ethernet in an industrial context by using the network calculus. In Proceedings of 4th IEEE international workshop on factory communication systems (pp. 19–26).

  • ISO. (2003). ISO11898-1 Read Vehicles Controller Area Network (CAN) Part 1: Data link layer and physical signalling.

  • Jumel, F., Thiriet, J.-M., Aubry, J.-F., & Malasse, O. (2003). Towards an information-based approach for the dependability evaluation of distributed control systems. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE information and measurement technology conference (Vol. 1, pp. 270–275). Vail, CO.

  • Koutsoukos, X., Zhao, F., Haussecker, H., Reich, J., & Cheung, P. (2001). Fault modeling for monitoring and diagnosis of sensor-rich hybrid systems. In Proceedings of 40th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC) (Vol. 1, pp. 793–801). Orlando, FL.

  • Lawrenz W., Lawrenz W. (1997) CAN system engineering: From theory to practical applications. Springer, Secaucus, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Lian, F.-L., Moyne, J., & Tilbury D. (2000). Control performance study of a networked machining cell. In Proceedings of the 2000 American control conference (Vol. 4, pp. 2337–2341).

  • Lian F.-L., Moyne J., Tilbury D. (2001) Performance evaluation of control networks: Ethernet, controlnet, and devicenet. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 21(1): 66–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon H.-j., Park H.S., Ahn S.C., Kwon W.H. (1998) Performance degradation of the ieee 802.4 token bus network in a noisy environment. Computer Communications 21(6): 547–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H.-j., Park, H.-s., Kim, D.-w., & Kwon W.-H. (1993). Analysis of the ieee 802.4 token-passing mechanism with noise. In Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on industrial electronics, control, and instrumentation (Vol. 1, pp. 541–546). Maui, Hawaii.

  • Navet N., Song Y.-Q., Simonot F. (2000) Worst-case deadline failure probability in real-time applications distributed over controller area network. Journal of Systems Architecture 46(7): 607–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson J., Bernhardsson B., Wittenmark B. (1998) Stochastic analysis and control of real-time systems with random time delays. Automatica 34(1): 57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Open DeviceNet Venders Association. (1997). DeviceNet specifications (2nd ed.)

  • Open DeviceNet Venders Association. (2006). Devicenet plant floor troubleshooting guide.

  • PEAK-Systems Technik GmbH. (2006). PCAN trace.

  • Pleinevaux P., Decotignie J.-D. (1988) Time critical communication networks: Field buses. Network, IEEE 2(3): 55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pranevicius H. (1998) Formal specification and analysis of distributed systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 9(6): 559–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Navas, G., Jimenez, J., & Proenza, J. (2003). An architecture for physical injection of complex fault scenarios in can networks. In Proceedings of IEEE conference on emerging technologies and factory automation, 2003 (Vol. 2, pp. 125–128).

  • Rufino, J. & Veríssimo P. (1995). A study on the inaccessibility characteristics of the Controller Area Network. In Proceedings of the 2nd international CAN conference (pp. 7.12–7.21). London, England: CiA.

  • Sampath M., Sengupta R., Lafortune S., Sinnamohideen K., Teneketzis D. C. (1996) Failure diagnosis using discrete-event models. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 4(2): 105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timoney R. (2004) Fieldbus: An enabling technology for today’s competitive environment. Hydrocarbon Processing 83(3): 45–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindell K., Burns A., Wellings A. (1995) Calculating controller area network (CAN) message response times. Control Engineering Practice 3(8): 1163–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Lei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lei, Y., Djurdjanovic, D., Barajas, L. et al. DeviceNet network health monitoring using physical layer parameters. J Intell Manuf 22, 289–299 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0291-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0291-9

Keywords

Navigation