Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Extending the notion of quality from physical metrology to information and sustainability

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we intend to demonstrate the need for extending the notion of quality from the physical domain to information and, more comprehensively, to sustainability. In physical metrology there are well established principles such as fundamental units, precision, accuracy, traceability and uncertainty. In order to understand and define quality for information and sustainability we need to develop metrological concepts similar to those of physical metrology. Research efforts related to information quality (IQ) are scattered. IQ is primarily defined in terms of several characteristics (dimensions) which lack consensus definitions and are sometimes subjective. However, the notion of IQ is currently in practice and has provided some useful insights towards defining formal approaches to IQ. In order to extend the notion of quality to sustainability we need, as in the case of information, a well defined metrology similar to physical metrology. Sustainability is currently getting attention in many areas of human endeavor. One proposal is to measure sustainability in terms of a triple bottom line, namely social, economical and environmental aspects of human endeavor. Sustainability metrics are continuously evolving and their clear definition is fundamental to the understanding of the notion of sustainability quality. As an example we consider evaluation of carbon footprint, as a metric towards sustainability, for manufacturing a simple turned part. After analyzing the current literature, we identify the following needs for characterizing the notion of sustainability quality: (a) standardized terminology of terms and concepts, (b) metrics and metrology, (c) harmonization and extension of standards, (d) conformance testbeds for standards and (e) development of information models that support sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Society for Quality. (2008). http://www.asq.org/glossary/q.html.

  • ASME Y14.5M. (1994). Dimensioning and tolerancing. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

  • ASME Y14.5.1M. (1994). Mathematical definition of dimensioning and tolerancing principles. New York: ASME.

  • Ballau D., Wang R., Pazer H., Tayi G. K. (1998) Modeling infor- mation manufacturing systems to determine information product quality. Management Science 44(4): 462–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bare J. C., Norris G. A., Pennington W., McKone T. (2002) TRACI—The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(3): 49–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohringer C., Jochem P. E. P. (2007) Measuring the immeasurable—A survey of sustainability indices. Ecological Economics 63: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BS 8900. (2008). Guidance for managing sustainable development (ISBN 0 580 481 43 3).

  • Carnahan, L., Carver, G., Ray, M., Hogan, M., Hopp, T., Horlick, J., et al. (2007). Metrology for information technology (IT). Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR 6025.

  • Datschefski E. (2001) The total beauty Of sustainable products. Rotovision SA, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • DOD. (1996). DOD guidelines on data quality management. http://www.tricare.mil/ocfo/_docs/DoDGuidelinesOnDataQualityManagement.pdf

  • Ebert U., Welsch H. (2004) Meaningful environmental indices: A social choice approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47: 270–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (2002). Sustainability risks being about everything and therefore, in the end, about nothing. The Economist.

  • Ekins P., Simon S., Deutsch L., Folke C., De Groot R. (2003) A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Economics 44(165): 185

    Google Scholar 

  • ELV. (2000). ELV Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles.

  • Energy Information Administration. (2002). Updated state-level greenhouse gas emission coefficients for electricity generation 1998–2000. Energy Information Administration, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy.

  • ENERGYSTAR. (2008). http://www.energystar.gov/.

  • EPA.GOV. (2008). http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/.

  • Harry M. J. (1988) The nature of six sigma quality. Motorola University Press, Schaumburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer R. W., Hoyer B. Y. B. (2001) What is quality?. Quality Progress 34(7): 53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE 1680. (2006). IEEE 1680-2006 standard for environmental assessment of personal computer products, including laptop & desktop computers & monitors.

  • IPC.ORG. (2008). http://members.ipc.org/committee/drafts/2-18_d_MaterialsDeclarationRequest.asp.

  • ISO 9001. (2000). Quality management systems—Requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

  • ISO. (1993). International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology (the VIM). Geneva: ISO.

  • ISO. (1995). Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, GUM. Geneva: ISO.

  • ISO 19011. (2002). Guidelines for quality and/or environmental management systems auditing. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

  • ISO 1101. (2004). Geometric Product Specification (GPS) - Geometrical tolerancing—Tolerancing of form, orientation, location and run-out—Generalities, definitions, symbols, indications on drawings. Geneva: ISO.

  • ISO 14001. (2004). Environmental management systems—Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

  • Ivester R., Heigel J. (2007) Smart machining systems: Robust optimization and adaptive control optimization for turning operations. Transcations of NAMRI/SME 35: 505–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain R. (2005) Sustainability: Metrics, specific indicators and preference index. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 7: 71–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JEDEC.ORG. (2008). http://www.jedec.org/download/search/ACF276.pdf.

  • Keffer, C., Shimp, R., & Lehni, M. (1999). Eco-efficiency indicators & reporting, report on the status of the project’s work in progress and guideline for pilot application. WBCSD, Working Group on Eco-efficiency Metrics and Reporting, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Klischewski, R., & Scholl, H. J. (2006). Information quality as a common ground for key players in e-government integration and interoperability, Vol. 4. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

  • Lee, J., Lee, Y., Ryu, Y., & Kang, T. (2007). Information quality drivers of KMS. Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Convergence Information Technology (pp. 1494–1499).

  • Lee Y. W., Strong D. M., Khan B. K., Wang R. (2002) AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Information and Management 40(2): 133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madnick, S., & Wang, R. (1992). Introduction to the TDQM research program. TDQM Working Paper Series.

  • Marotta, A. (2007). Quality management in MSIS. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/588629.html.

  • Mayer A. L. (2008) Strengths and weakness of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. Environment International 34(2): 277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MDSYSTEM. (2008). http://www.mdsystem.com/index.jsp.

  • National Research Council. (1999). Our common journey: A transition toward sustainability. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • NSF 140. (2005). Draft Standard NSF 140–2005: Sustainable carpet assessment draft standard. Michigan: NSF International.

  • Patil G. P., Taillie C. (2008) Multiple indicators, partially ordered sets, and linear extensions: Multi-criterion ranking and prioritization. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 11: 199–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patlitzianas K. D., Doukas H., Kagiannas A. G., Psarras J. (2008) Sustainable energy policy indicators: Review and recommendations. Renewable Energy 33(5): 966–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REACH. (2006). Regulation (EC) No1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).

  • Rekacewicz, P. (2005). Climate change: Processes, characteristics and threats. UNEP/Grid-Arendal Maps and Graphics Library. http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/climate_change_processes_characteristics_and_threats.

  • Resnik P. (1999) Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11: 95–130

    Google Scholar 

  • RoHS. (2003). Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 27 January 2003, on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Official Journal of the European Union, 833 L37/19-L37/23.

  • Shankaranarayanan, G., & Wang, R. (2008). IPMAP: Research status and direction. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Quality (pp. 510–517).

  • Sikdar S. K. (2008) Sustainable development and sustainability metrics. AIChE Journal 49(8): 1928–1932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavins R. N., Wagner A. F., Wagner G. (2003) Interpreting sustainability in economic terms: Dynamic efficiency plus intergenerational equity. Economic Letters 79(3): 339–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong D. M., Lee Y. W., Wang R. (1997) 10 Potholes in the road of information quality. Computer 30(8): 38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyt, D. A. (2007). An assessment of the United States measurement system: Addressing measurement barriers to accelerate innovation. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR 6025.

  • Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., et al. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14), 8074–8079.

  • USGBC.ORG. (2008). http://www.usgbc.org/.

  • WEEE. (2003). Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 27 January 2003, on waste electrical and electronic equipment. Official Journal of the European Union, L37/24-L37/38.

  • Wetherill G. B., Brown D. W. (1991) Statistical process control: Theory and practice. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2007). A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. ISAUK Research Report 07-01.

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • World Metrology Day. (2004). Summary. http://www.bipm.org/en/convention/wmd/2004/.

  • Ying, S., & Zhanming, J. (2007). Assuring information quality in knowledge intensive business services. International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (pp. 3238–3241).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-2920, USA

    Gaurav Ameta

  2. Design and Process Group, Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA

    Sudarsan Rachuri, Xenia Fiorentini, Mahesh Mani, Steven J. Fenves, Kevin W. Lyons & Ram D. Sriram

Authors
  1. Gaurav Ameta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sudarsan Rachuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xenia Fiorentini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mahesh Mani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Steven J. Fenves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kevin W. Lyons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ram D. Sriram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudarsan Rachuri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ameta, G., Rachuri, S., Fiorentini, X. et al. Extending the notion of quality from physical metrology to information and sustainability. J Intell Manuf 22, 737–750 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0333-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0333-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation