Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic fatigue damage prognosis using maximum entropy approach

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general framework for probabilistic fatigue damage prognosis using maximum entropy concept is proposed and developed in this paper. The fatigue damage is calculated using a physics-based crack growth model. Due to the stochastic nature of fatigue crack propagation process, uncertainties arising from the underlying physical model, parameters of the model and the response variable measurement noise are considered and integrated into this framework. Incorporating all those uncertainties, a maximum relative entropy (MRE) approach is proposed to update the statistical description of model parameters and narrow down the prognosis deviations. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation is then employed to generate samples from updated posterior probability distributions and provide statistical information for the maximum relative entropy updating procedure. A numerical toy problem is given to demonstrate the proposed MRE prognosis methodology. Experimental data for aluminum alloys are used to validate model predictions under uncertainty. Following this, a detailed comparison between the proposed MRE approach and the classical Bayesian updating method is performed to illustrate advantages of the proposed prognosis framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caticha, A., & Giffin, A. (2006). Updating probabilities. In A. M. Djafari (Ed.), Bayesian inference and maximum entropy methods in science and engineering, AIP Conference Proceedings, 31, 872.

  • Caticha A., Preuss R. (2004) Maximum entropy and Bayesian data analysis: Entropic prior distributions. Physical Review E 70(4): 046127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman R. G., Kearney V. E., Engle R. M. (1967) Numerical analysis of crack propagation in a cyclic-loaded structure. Journal of Basic Engineering, Transactions of American Society of Mechanical Engineers 89: 459–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Giffin, A., & Caticha, A. (2007). Updating probabilities with data and moments. In K. Knuth (Ed.), Bayesian inference and maximum entropy methods in science and engineering, AIP Conference Proceedings, 954, 74.

  • Hastings W. K. (1970) Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov Chains and their applications. Biometrika 57(1): 97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes, E. T. (1957). Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review, 106, 620–630 and 108, 171–190.

  • Jaynes E. T. (1979) Where do we stand on Maximum Entropy. In: Levine R. D., Tribus M. (eds) The Maximum entropy formalism. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, pp 15–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotulski Z. A. (1998) On efficiency of identification of a stochastic crack propagation model based on virkler experimental data. Archives of Mechanics 50(5): 829–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullback S., Leibler R. A. (1951) On information and sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22(1): 79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen H. (1997) Stochastic modeling of fatigue crack growth and inspection. In: Soares C. G. (eds) Probabilistic methods for structure design, collection solid mechanics and its applications. Kluwer, The Netherlands, pp 59–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A. W., Rosenbluth M. N., Teller A. H., Teller E. (1953) Equations of state calculations by fast computing machine. Journal of Chemical Physics 21(6): 1087–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostergaard, D. F., & Hillberry, B. M. (1983). Characterization of the variability in fatigue crack propagation data. In J. M. Bloom, & J. C. Ekvall (Eds.), Probabilistic fracture mechanics and fatigue methods: Application for structural design and maintenance, ASTM STP 798 (pp. 97–115). American Society for Testing and Materials.

  • Paris P. C., Erdogan F. (1963) A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. Journal of Basic Engineering, Transactions of American Society of Mechanical Engineers 85: 528–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, F., Sudret, B., & Pendola, M. (2007). Bayesian updating of mechanical models–Application in fracture mechanics. In 18ème Congrès Français de Mécanique, CFM 2007, Grenoble.

  • Skilling J. (1988) The axioms of maximum entropy. In: Erickson G. J., Smith C. R. (eds) Maximum entropy and Bayesian methods, in science and engineering, vol. 1. Kluwer, Netherlands, pp 173–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarantola, A. (2005). Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. Philadelphia, USA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 3600 University City Science Center.

  • Tseng C., Caticha A. (2008) Using relative entropy to find optimal approximations: An application to simple fluids. Physica A 387: 6759–6770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virkler D. A., Hillberry B. M., Goel P. K. (1979) The statistical nature of fatigue crack propagation. ASME Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology 101: 148–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. (1970). The effect of stress ratio during crack propagation and fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 aluminum. In Effects of environment and complex load history on fatigue life. ASTM STP 462 (pp. 1–14). American Society for Testing and Materials.

  • Zhang R., Mahadevan S. (2000) Model uncertainty and Bayesian updating in reliability-based inspection. Structure Safety 22(2): 145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongming Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guan, X., Jha, R. & Liu, Y. Probabilistic fatigue damage prognosis using maximum entropy approach. J Intell Manuf 23, 163–171 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0341-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0341-3

Keywords

Navigation