Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Communities of practice model driven knowledge management in multinational knowledge based enterprises

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing research in intelligent manufacturing literature has highlighted the need for linking organizational culture, business strategy with Knowledge Management (KM) as well as measuring the performance of knowledge management systems for best practice. Communities of Practice (CoPs) are accepted as best practice and distinct from organizational structures while implementing KM. Besides, employing CoPs as an approach for linking business strategies with KM design, CoPs can be the prevailing way for group learning and innovation building within firms. As firms grow in size, scope, and complexity, CoPs members who regularly engage in sharing and learning based on common interests, could improve organizational performance. The purpose of this work is to design a CoPs model for KM which addresses issues related to organization culture, business strategy and performance measurement reported in earlier publications in intelligent manufacturing. A CoPs evaluation hierarchy for KM is developed. It includes four dimensions and sixteen criteria for studying and evaluating organizational culture and business strategy. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach has been employed to quantitatively analyze various criteria priorities and business strategy preferences of CoPs. In order to validate the CoPs model, a case study has been undertaken in two multinational knowledge based organizations and the results are compared to differentiate strategic preferences. The contributions of this paper include: a) Definition of a CoPs model based on sixteen criteria which helps to understand an organization’s KM culture or CoPs; b) Employing these criteria to link an organization‘s KM culture with four business strategies; c) Develop a quantitative method for measuring KM performance in the context of four business strategies, and d) Validating the CoPs model through its application in two multinationals in Taiwan and Japan. The CoPs model thus can be used by organizations to understand their KM culture, allocate resources towards the chosen business strategy and measure KM performance in the context of the chosen business strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allee, V. (2000). Knowledge networks and Communities of Practice. OD Practitioner Online, 32(4).

  • Bellman R. E., Zadeh L. A. (1970) Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science 17(4): 141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodrow W. (2007) Toward European knowledge enterprises. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18: 459–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. (1991) Organizational learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science 2(1): 40–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. (2000) The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. (2001) Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science 12(2): 198–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley J. J. (1985) Ranking alternatives using fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 15(1): 21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra C., Kamrani A.K. (2003) Knowledge management for consumer-focused product design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 14(6): 557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C. H., Mon D. L. (1994) Evaluating weapon system by analytical hierarchy process based on fuzzy scales. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 63: 1–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chira O., Chira C., Roche T., Tormey D., Brennan A. (2006) An agent-based approach to knowledge management in distribute design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17: 737–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu M. T., Shyu J. Z., Tzeng G. H., Khosla R. (2007) Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications 33(4): 1011–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu M. T., Shyu J. Z., Tzeng G. H., Khosla R. (2007) Using non-additive fuzzy integral to assess performance of organization transformation via Communities of Practice. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 54(2): 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet P., Meyer-Krahmer F. (2001) The theoretical and policy implications of knowledge codification. Research Policy 30: 1563–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubis D., Prade H. (1978) Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Systems Science 9: 613–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner Group. (1999). Knowledge management: Understanding the core value and science. Business Technology Journal.

  • Grundspenkis J. (2007) Agent based approach for organization and personal knowledge modeling: Knowledge management perspective. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18: 451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth P., Kimble C. (2004) Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang C. L., Yoon K. (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. A state-of-art survey. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ITRI Experience of Knowledge Management. (2003). Task force of ITRI-KM.

  • ITRI Web (2007). http://www.itri.org.tw/chi/about/fe-about-20030501-1.jsp2.

  • Kerzner H. (1989) A system approach to planning scheduling and controlling. Paper Management, New York, pp 759–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimble C., Hildreth P. (2005) Dualities, distributed Communities of Practice and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management 9(4): 102–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave J., Wenger E. (1991) Situated learning—Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press Articles, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave J., Wenger E. (1991) Situated learning. UK Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser E. L., Storck J. (2001) Communities of Practice and organizational performance. IBM Systems Journal 40(4): 831–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael F. (2001) Keeping Communities of Practice a float. Knowledge Management Review 4: 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Mon D. L., Cheng C. H., Lin J. C. (1994) Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weigh. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 61: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, D. (1998). Knowledge management systems: Converting and connecting. IEEE Intelligent Systems Journal, 13, 30–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr J. (1990) Sharing knowledge celebrating identity: War stories and community memory in a service culture. In: Middleton D. S., Edwards D. (eds) Collective remembering: Memory in society. Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasovska I., Chebel-Morello B., Zerhouni N. (2008) A mix method of knowledge capitalization in maintenance. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19: 347–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosario J. G. (1996) Much ado about knowledge capital. Business World, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T. L. (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(2): 234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T. L. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs P. (1995) Transforming work: Collaboration learning and design. Communications of the ACM 38(9): 36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shyu, J. Z. (2003). The evaluation criteria and location preferences for selecting foundry service providers by IC designers. Journal of Management, 20(2)

  • Tang M. T., Tzeng G. H. (1999) A hierarchy fuzzy MCDM method for studying electronic marketing strategies in the information service industry. Journal of International Information Management 8(1): 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng J. Y., Tzeng G. H. (1996) Fuzzy multi-criteria ranking of urban transportation investment alternative. Transportation Planning and Technology 20(1): 15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Distant Consulting Company. (2000). Community of practice: Role & responsibilities.

  • The Distant Consulting Company. (2001). Community of practice: Overview. http://home.att.net/~discon/km/CoPss.htm.

  • Tsaur S. H., Tzeng G. H., Wang K. C. (1997) Evaluating tourist risks from fuzzy perspectives. Annals of Tourism Research 24(4): 796–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng G. H. (1977) A study on the PATTERN method for the decision process in the public system. Japan Journal of Behavior Metrics 4(2): 29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng G. H., Shiau T. A. (1987) Energy conservation strategies in urban transportation: Application of multiple criteria decision-making. Energy Systems and Policy 11(1): 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng G. H., Teng J. Y. (1994) Multi-criteria evaluation for strategies of improving and controlling air-quality in the super city: A case of Taipei city. Journal of Environmental Management 40(3): 213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng G. H., Shian T. A., Lin C. Y. (1992) Application of multi-criteria decision making to the evaluation of new energy-system development in Taiwan. Energy 17(10): 983–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Commerce. (1965). National Technical Information Service. NASA, PATTERN Relevance Guide, 3.

  • Walsh, D. (1998). Knowledge value added: Assessing both fixed and variable value. http://www.businessprocessaudits.com/kvawalsh.htm.

  • Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of Practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, Jan–Feb, pp. 139–145.

  • Wenger E. (1998) Communities of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E., Snyder W. H. (2000) Communities of Practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review 78: 139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E., McDermott R. A., Snyder W. (2002) Cultivating communities of Practice. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu H. C., Lee Z. Y. (2002) Evaluation of the issuing policy for national 3G telecommunications license using the fuzzy multi-evaluation strategic method. Management Commentary 21(1): 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L. A. (1965) Information and control. Fuzzy Sets 8(3): 338–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Parts 1, 2, and 3. Information Science, 8(2), 199–249, 8(3), 301–357; 9(1), 43–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhau R., Goving R. (1991) Algebraic characteristics of extended fuzzy numbers. Information Science 54(1): 103–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia

    Mei-Tai Chu & Rajiv Khosla

  2. Department of Intelligence Science and Technology, Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

    Toyoaki Nishida

Authors
  1. Mei-Tai Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rajiv Khosla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Toyoaki Nishida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajiv Khosla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chu, MT., Khosla, R. & Nishida, T. Communities of practice model driven knowledge management in multinational knowledge based enterprises. J Intell Manuf 23, 1707–1720 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0472-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0472-6

Keywords