Skip to main content
Log in

Overall performance measurement in a supply chain: towards a supplier-prime manufacturer based model

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study deals with the supply chain (SC) overall performance expression. The developed idea concerns more particularly the performance of the manufactured products. Indeed, two companies or more contribute to the manufacturing of products that are generally assembled by the prime manufacturer company. Moreover, in the industrial practice, performance scorecards are defined with regard to each process; and the overall performance is neither expressed for each company, nor for the whole SC. We propose here to identify the SC overall performance to the combination of the performances of the different involved companies in the SC. Thus, in order to obtain a definition of such performance, we choose to focus first on the performance of the prime manufacturer. In this sense, the approach is based on the SCOR model for the handling of the main processes around the considered product manufacturing. The prime manufacturer performance is then defined as the aggregation of its involved processes’ performances. While the prime manufacturer performance is strongly dependent on the suppliers’ performance, we suggest the integration of the impacting supplier performance into the prime manufacturer scorecards. From an operational point of view, the MACBETH methodology is used to coherently express both processes and overall performances. More precisely, the Choquet aggregation integral operator is applied in order to model mutual interactions between processes. Finally, the expression of a bearing’s manufacturer performance illustrates the proposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angerhofer B. J., Angelides M. C. (2006) A model and a performance measurement system for collaborative supply chains. Decision support system 42(1): 283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, J. B. (2000). Handbook of supply chain management, 400 p APICS series on resource management. Alexandria, Virginia, USA

  • Bana e Costa C., Vansnick J. C. (1997) Applications of the MACBETH approach in the framework of an additive aggregation model. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6: 107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bana e Costa C., De Corte J. M., Vansnick J. C. (2004) On the mathematical foundations of MACBETH, 409–442. In: Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M. (eds) MCDA multiple criteria decision analysis. Kluwer, Boston/Dordrecht/London, p 1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Barut M., Faisst W., Kanet J. J. (2002) Measuring supply chain coupling: An information system perspective. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 8: 161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamon B. (1998) Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods. International Journal of Production Economics 55: 281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrah L., Mauris G., Vernadat F. (2004) Information aggregation in industrial performance measurement: Rationales, issues and definitions. International Journal of Production Research 42: 4271–4293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrah L., Clivillé V. (2007) Towards an aggregation performance measurement system model in a supply chain context. Computers in Industry 58(7): 709–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bititci U. S. (1995) Modelling of performance measurement systems in manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics 42: 137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bititci U. S., Suwignjo P., Carrie A.S. (2001) Strategy management through quantitative modelling of performance measurement systems. International Journal Production Economics 69(2): 15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan F.T. (2003) Performance measurement in a supply chain. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 21: 534–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clivillé, V., & Berrah, L., (2006). Overall performance measurement in a supply chain. In Proceedings of 12th IFAC symposium on information control problems in manufacturing (INCOM 2006). CD-ROM, Saint-Etienne, France, May 2006, 6 p.

  • Clivillé V., Berrah L., Mauris G. (2007) Quantitative expression and aggregation of performance measurements based on the MACBETH multi-criteria method. International Journal of Production Economics 105(1): 171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diakoulaki D., Mavrotas G., Papagyannakis L. (1992) A multicriteria approach for evaluating the performance of industrial firms. Omega 20: 467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folan P., Browne J. (2005) A review of performance measurement: Towards performance management. Computers in Industry 56: 663–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globerson S. (1985) Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organisation. International Journal of production research 23: 639–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch M. (1997) k-ordered discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy sets and Systems 92: 167–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran A., Patelb C., McGaughey R. E. (2004) A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics 87: 333–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran A., LaiK. Cheng E. (2008) Responsive supply chain: A competitive strategy in a networked economy. Omega 36(4): 549–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, W. & (2004) In H. T. P. Harrison, H. L. Lee, J.J. Neale (Eds.). The practice of supply chain management: Where theory and application converge. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media

  • ISO. (2001). Qualité et systèmes de management ISO 9000, AFNOR, 581 p.

  • Kranz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement: Additive and polynomial representations. Academic Press, 1971, new edition by Dover edition, 2006 (624 p).

  • Labreuche C., Grabisch M. (2003) The Choquet integral for the aggregation of interval scales in multi-criteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 137: 11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman C., Fortuin L., Wouters M. (2004) Designing a performance measurement system: A case study. European Journal of Operational Research 156: 267–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marichal J. L. (2000) An axiomatic approach of the discrete Choquet integral as a tool to aggregate interacting criteria. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 8: 800–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk S. A., Stewart D. M., Swin M. (2004) Metrics and performance measurement in operations management: dealing with the metrics maze. Journal of Operations Management 22(3): 209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely A. (1999) The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next?. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 19: 205–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. (2004). The analytic hierarchy and the analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision making, 345–407. In J. Figueira, S., Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), MCDA: Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys (p. 1040). Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer.

  • SCOR 80 (2007). SCOR 80 overview booklet, supply chain council editions. 2000 organisation avalaible on http://www.supply-chain.org/cs/root/home.

  • Suwignjo P., Bititci U.S. (2000) Quantitative models for performance measurement system. International Journal of Production Economics 64: 231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa A. (2001) Introducing some Supply Chain Management problems. International Journal of Production Economics 73: 1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Clivillé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clivillé, V., Berrah, L. Overall performance measurement in a supply chain: towards a supplier-prime manufacturer based model. J Intell Manuf 23, 2459–2469 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0512-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0512-x

Keywords

Navigation