Skip to main content
Log in

Incorporating trust in networked production systems

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a decision-making pattern that uses trust mechanisms. It comprises an expectation module that performs two functions. First, it infers—based on past performance—how information is to be understood (e.g. consider the expected outcome of a promise to deliver tomorrow, morgen, mañana or domani). Second, it infers—based on past performance—the uncertainty on the expected behavior. This pattern makes a key contribution by enabling cooperation in large systems of systems without requiring conventional integration, which typically results in rigidity and monolithic system designs. It contributes to the development of holonic systems or nearly decomposable systems that deliver most of the advantages of integration without the disadvantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babiceanu R., Chen F. (2006) Development and applications of holonic manufacturing systems: A survey. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17(1): 111–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camarinha-Matos L., Afsarmanesh H. (2005) Collaborative networks: A new scientific discipline. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 16(4): 439–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcone, R., Pezzulo, G., & Castelfranchi, C. (2003). A fuzzy approach to a belief-based trust computation. In: Trust, reputation, and security: Theories and practice (pp. 55–60). Berlin: Springer.

  • Geraci A. (1991) IEEE standard computer dictionary: Compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries. IEEE Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, N. (2006). A fuzzy approach to reasoning with trust, distrust and insufficient trust. In: 10th international workshop on cooperative information agents, September 11–13, 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland.

  • Hadeli, V. P., Van Brussel, H., Saint Germain, B., Verstraete, P., & Van Belle, J. (2007). Towards the design of autonomic nervousness handling in holonic manufacturing executing systems. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics 7–10 October 2007, pp. 2883–2888.

  • Jøsang A., Ismail R., Boyd C. (2007) A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems 43(2): 618–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klos, T., & Poutré, H. L. (2006). A versatile approach to combining trust values for making binary decisions. In: Trust management (pp. 206–220). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Koestler, A. (1990). The ghost in the machine. Penguin Group ISBN 0-14-019192-5.

  • Lorini E., Castelfranchi C. (2007) The cognitive structure of surprise: Looking for basic principles. Topoi 26(1): 133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, S. P. (1994). Formalising trust as a computational concept. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Stirling.

  • Mönch L., Stehli M. (2003) Multiagent system technologies. Springer, Berlin, p 341

    Google Scholar 

  • Panetto H., Molina A. (2008) Enterprise integration and interoperability in manufacturing systems: Trends and issues. Computers in Industry 59: 641–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabater J., Sierra C. (2005) Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artificial Intelligence Review 24(1): 33–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint Germain B. (2010) Distributed coordination and control for networked production systems. K.U. Leuven, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra, C., & Debenham, J. (2005). An information-based model for trust. In: AAMAS ’05: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 497–504).

  • Simon H. (1996) The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. (1997) Models of bounded rationality, (Vol. 3). MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Valckenaers P., Van Brussel H. (2005) Holonic manufacturing execution systems. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 54(3): 427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valckenaers P., Hadeli K., Saint Germain B., Verstraete P., Van Brussel H. (2006) Emergent short-term forecasting through ant colony engineering in coordination and control systems. Advanced Engineering Informatics 20(3): 261–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valckenaers P., Cavalieri S., Saint Germain B., Verstraete P., Hadeli K., Bandinelli R., Sergio T., Van Brussel H. (2006) A benchmarking service for the manufacturing control research community. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17(16): 667–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos, W., Kollingbaum, M. J., & Norman, T. J. (2007). Resolving conflict and inconsistency in norm-regulated virtual organizations. In: Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, ACM (pp. 1–8).

  • Weyns D. (2006) An architecture-centric approach for software engineering with situated multi agent systems. K.U. Leuven, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart Saint Germain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saint Germain, B., Valckenaers, P., Van Belle, J. et al. Incorporating trust in networked production systems. J Intell Manuf 23, 2635–2646 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0597-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0597-2

Keywords

Navigation