Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Service customization under capacity constraints: an auction-based model

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In mass customization, companies strive to enhance customer value by providing products and services that are approximate to customers’ needs. A company’s strategy of allocating its limited capacity to meeting diverse customer requirements directly impact customer perceived value in terms of available options, cost, and schedule. Proposed in this paper is an auction-based mass customization model for solving the problem of service customization under capacity constraints. The proposed model integrates customers’ customization decision making with the allocation of company’s capacity through multilateral negotiation between the company and its customers. The negotiation is conducted through a combinatorial iterative auction designed to maximize the overall customer value given limited capacity. The auction is incentive-compatible in the sense that customers will follow the prescribed myopic best-response bidding strategy. Experimental results indicate that customization solutions computed by the proposed model are very close to the optimal one. Revenue performance is also adequate when there is sufficient competition in the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson E. W., Fornell C., Rust R. T. (1997) Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: Differences between goods and services. Marketing Science 16(2): 129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A., Tenhunen, M., & Ygge, F. (2000). Integer programming for combinatorial auction winner determination. In Proceedings of the Fourth Internal Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS) (pp. 39–46). Boston, MA: IEEE computer society.

  • Baker, A. D. (1991). Manufacturing control with a market-driven contract net. Ph.D. Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.

  • Blecker T., Abdelkafi N., Kreutler G., Kaluza B. (2004) Auction-based variety formation and steering for mass customization. Electronic Markets 14(3): 232–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao J., Wang J., Law K., Zhang S., Li M. (2006) An interactive service customization model. Information and Software Technology 48(4): 280–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S., Tseng M. M. (2007) Aligning demand and supply flexibility in custom product co-design. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 19(4): 596–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S., Tseng M. M. (2010) A negotiation-credit-auction mechanism for procuring customized products. International Journal of Production Economics 127(1): 203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chokshi N., McFarlane D. (2008) A distributed architecture for reconfigurable control of continuous process operations. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19(2): 215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke E. H. (1971) Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11(1): 17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silveira G., Borenstein D., Fogliatto F. S. (2001) Mass customization: Literature review and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics 72(1): 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries S., Vohra R. V. (2003) Combinatorial auctions: A survey. INFORMS Journal on Computing 15(3): 284–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X., Jiao J., Tseng M. M. (2001) Architecture of product family: Fundamentals and methodology. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application 9(4): 309–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujishima, Y., Leyton-Brown, K., & Shoham, Y. (1999). Taming the computational complexity of combinatorial auctions: Optimal and approximate approaches. In 16th International joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI) (pp. 548–553).

  • Groves T. (1973) Incentives in teams. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 41: 617–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, L., Hasegawa, T., Luh, P. B., Tamura, S., & Oblak, J. M. (1994). Holonic planning and scheduling for a robotic assembly testbed. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on CIM and automation technology, Troy, NY, October (pp. 142–149). New York: IEEE.

  • Hohner G., Rich J., Ng E., Reid G., Davenport A. J., Kalagnanam J. R. et al (2003) Combinatorial and quantity-discount procurement auctions benefit Mars, incorporated and its suppliers. Interfaces 33(1): 23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IntelliQuest. (1990). Conjoint analysis: A guide for designing and integrating conjoint studies, marketing research technique series studies. American Marketing Association, Market Research Division, TX.

  • Jiao J., Tseng M. M. (1999) A methodology of developing product family architecture for mass customization. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 10(1): 3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J., Simpson T., Siddique Z. (2007) Product family design and platform-based product development: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18(1): 5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin G. Y., Solberg J. J. (1992) Integrated shop floor control using autonomous agents. IIE Transactions 24(3): 57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell A., Whinston M. D., Green J. R. (1995) Microeconomics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M. H., Utterback J. M. (1993) The product family and the dynamics of core capability. Sloan Management Review 34(3): 29–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P. R., Weber R. J. (1982) A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50: 1089–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon S. K., Shu J., Simpson T. W., Kumara S. R. T. (2010) A module-based service model for mass customization: Service family design. IIE Transactions 43(3): 153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses S., Gruenwald L., Dadachanji K. (2008) A scalable data structure for real-time estimation of resource availability in build-to-order environments. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19(5): 611–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes D. C., Kalagnanam J. (2005) Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Science 51(3): 435–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes D. (2006) Iterative combinatorial auctions. In: Cramton P., Shoham Y., Steinberg R. (Eds.) Combinatorial auctions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 41–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson S. E. (2001) Understanding service businesses: Applying principles of the unified services theory (2nd ed.). Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm T. (2002) Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Artificial Intelligence 135(1–2): 1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm T., Suri S., Gilpin A., Levine D. (2005) CABOB: A fast optimal algorithm for winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Management Science 51(3): 374–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson T. W., Maier J. R. A., Mistree F. (2001) Product platform design: Method and application. Research in Engineering Design 13(1): 2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson T. W. (2004) Product platform design and customization: Status and promise. AIEDAM 18(1): 3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw M. J. (1988) Dynamic scheduling in cellular manufacturing systems: A framework for networked decision making. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 7(2): 83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen W., Wang L., Qi H. (2006) Agent-based distributed manufacturing process planning and scheduling: A state-of-the-art survey. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews 36(4): 563–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng M. M., Jiao J. (1996) Design for mass customization. Annals of the CIRP 45(1): 153–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng M. M., Du X. (1998) Design by customers for mass customization products. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology 47(1): 103–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng M. M., Jiao J. (2001) Mass customization. In: Salvendy G. (Ed.) Handbook of industrial engineering: Technology and operations management. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 684–708

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich K. (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy 24(3): 419–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey W. (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of finance 16(1): 8–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss C. A., Hsuan J. (2009) Service architecture and modularity. Decision Sciences 40(3): 541–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C., Ghenniwa H. H., Shen W. (2009) Constraint-based winner determination for auction-based scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 39(3): 609–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman M. P., Walsh W. E., Wurman P. R., MacKie-Mason J. K. (2001) Auction protocols for decentralized scheduling. Games and Economic Behavior 35(1–2): 271–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Chun Wang & Farnaz Dargahi

Authors
  1. Chun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Farnaz Dargahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, C., Dargahi, F. Service customization under capacity constraints: an auction-based model. J Intell Manuf 24, 1033–1045 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0689-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0689-7

Keywords