Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating systematic layout planning with fuzzy constraint theory to design and optimize the facility layout for operating theatre in hospitals

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of the competition of the medical market and the importance of the operaing theatre (OT), the OT process efficiency becomes a hot spot problem in hospital management. The OT facility layout is not only a problem about cost reduction, but also a great contribute to the efficiency of OT process. However, the facility layout optimization of OT was always ignored in the past decades. In order to become more competitive in the medical market, the facility layout of OT should be considered as an essential section in early design phase. To overcome these problems, this paper proposed a approach for designing and optimizing the facility layout of OT in hospitals. First, systematic layout planning (SLP) is applied to design the layout of OT based on the logistics and non-logistics relationships. The SLP is a tool which is used to arrange a workplace in a plant by locating two areas with high frequency and logical relationships close to each other. After that, fuzzy constraint theory is proposed for comprehensively evaluate the layout schemes. Fuzzy constraint theory uses objective function and constraint conditions for solving the problem which involves uncertainty. After designing and optimizing the facility layout of OT in Shanghai East Hospital, we can get the optimal layout plan. The aim of this study was development a new approach to design and optimize the facility layout for OT. This research results are able to help the hospital managers to adopt more modern management approaches in every day practise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allegri, T. M. (1984). Material handling: Principles and practices. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astrop, A., van der Merwe, T., & Muller, M. (1996). Standards for the management of swabs, needles and instruments in the operating theatre. Curationis, 19(4), 2–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, J., & Cheng, C. H. (2007). Multi-period planning and uncertainty issues in cellular manufacturing: A review and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 281–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, A. (2008). Optimization of facility design and workflow process at the phlebotomy clinic of Toronto general hospital. Toronto: University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cima, R. R., Brown, M. J., Hebl, J. R., Moore, R., Rogers, J. C., Kollengode, A., et al. (2011). Use of lean and six sigma methodology to improve operating room efficiency in a high-volume tertiary-Care Academic Medical Center. Journal of American College of Surgeons, 213(1), 93–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, B., Viapiano, J., & Vogl, A. (2007). Optimization of surgery sequencing and scheduling decisions under uncertainty. Health Care Management Science, 10(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, F., & Epstein, R. H. (2005). Operating room efficiency and scheduling. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, 18, 195–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, F., Macario, A., Lubarsky, D. A., & Burns, D. D. (1999). Statistical method to evaluate management strategies to decrease variability in operating room utilization: Application of linear statistical modeling and Monte Carlo simulation to operating room management. Anesthesiology, 91, 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, H. (2005). Facilities planning and logistics. Beijing: Machinery Industry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwijayanti, K., & Dawal, S. Z. , (2010). A Proposed study on facility planning and design in manufacturing process (pp. 1640–1645). Hong Kong: In Proceeding of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists.

  • Enea, M., Galante, G., & Panascia, E. (2005). The facility layout problem approached using a fuzzy model and a genetic search. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 16(3), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esnaf, Ş., & Kűçűkdeniz, T. (2009). A fuzzy clustering-based hybrid method for a multi-facility location problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20(2), 259–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyzollahi, M., Shokouhi, A., Modarres Yazdi, M., & Tarokh, M. (2009). Designing a model for optimal hospital unit layout. Pajoohandeh Journal, 14(4), 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. M., Sokal, S. M., Chang, Y. C., & Berger, D. L. (2006). Increasing operating room efficiency through parallel processing. Annals of Surgery, 243(1), 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J.P. (2004). Construction office design with systematic layout planning. In 2nd World conference on POM 15th Annual POM conference Cancun, Mexico.

  • Guerriero, F., & Guido, R. (2011). Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: A survey. Health Care Management Science, 14, 89–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, P. M., & Krarup, J. (2001). A hospital facility layout problem finally solved. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 12(5–6), 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A Manifesto for business revolution. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harders, M., Mark, A. M., Weight, S., & Sidhu, T. (2006). Improving operating room efficiency through process redesign. Surgery, 140(4), 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengst, M., Hlupic, V., & Currie, W.L. (2004). The increasing need for integrating simulation and collaboration to support change management programs. Hawaii. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–8.

  • Jebali, A., & Hadj Alouane, A. B. (2006). Operating rooms scheduling. International Journal of Production Economics, 99, 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleczkowski, B. M., Montoya-Aguilar, C., & Nilsson, N. O. (1985). Approaches to planning and design of health care facilities in developing areas. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koneczny, S. (2009). The operating room: Architectural conditions and potential hazards. Work, 33, 145–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulturel, S. (2007). Approaches to uncertainties in facility layout problems: Perspectives at the beginning of the 21st century. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18(2), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. Y. (2012). Integrating simulation and ant colony optimization to improve the service facility layout in a station. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 26(2), 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. Y., & Tseng, H. H. (2012). A hybrid system for facility layout by integrating simulation and ant colony optimization. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 6(2S), 387S–396S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, A., & Bloor, K. (1995). Health care reform: Informing difficult choices. International Journal of Heath Planning and Management, 10, 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motaghi, M., Hamzenejad, A., & Riyahi, L. (2011). Optimization of hospital layout through the application of heuristic techniques (Diamond Algorithm) in Shafa hospital. International Journal of Management of Business Research, 1(3), 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, E.V. (2005). Managing equipment and instruments in the operating room. AORN Journal, 81(2), 349–352,355–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Øvretveit, J. (2000). Total quality management in European healthcare. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 13(2), 74–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgaonkar, A. S. (2004). Modeling and analysis of the hospital facility layout problem. New Jersey: New Jersey Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasandideh, S. H. R., & Niaki, S. T. A. (2012). Genetic application in a facility location problem with random demand within queuing framework. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(3), 651–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis, J., & Zimring, C. (1996). Designing friendly hospital layouts-the contributions of space-syntax. Journal of Healthcare Design, 8, 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raoot, A. D., & Rakshit, A. (1993). An experimental comparison of systematic placement procedures for facility layout design. International Journal of Production Research, 31(7), 1735–1756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, W. S., Daily, B., Egan, M., Stahl, J. E., GoldmanJ, M., Wiklund, R. A., et al. (2005). Deliberate perioperative systems design improves operating room throughput. Anesthesiology, 103, 406–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarkesh, H., Atighehchian, A., & Nookabadi, A. S. (2009). Facility layout design using virtual multi-agent system. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20, 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, J. A., White, J. A., Bozer, Y. A., Frazelle, E. H., Tanchoco, J. M. A., & Trevino, J. (1996). Facilities planning (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tilburg, C. M., Leistikow, I. P., Rademaker, C. M., Bierings, M. B., & van Dijk, A. T. (2006). Health care failure mode and effect analysis: a useful proactive risk analysis in a pediatric oncology ward. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 15(1), 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. H. (2005). Modern logistics engineering. Beijing: National Defence Industry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, T., Su, C. T., & Hsu, Y. R. (2000). Systematic layout planning: a study on semiconductor wafer fabrication facilities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(11), 1359–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank to the authors of this paper’s references whose work has contributed greatly to the completion of this thesis. And thank to the partners of the research as well as professionals in Shanghai East Hospital. The authors also want to thank both referees for their constructive suggestions that led to substantial improvements of an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, QL., Liu, HC., Wang, DJ. et al. Integrating systematic layout planning with fuzzy constraint theory to design and optimize the facility layout for operating theatre in hospitals. J Intell Manuf 26, 87–95 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0764-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0764-8

Keywords