Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Product customization of tablet computers based on the information of online reviews by customers

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the first release of Apple iPad in April 2010, tablet computers (or simply tablets) can be viewed as a new category of technological products for general consumers. To compete in the evolving market, it is expected that the manufacturers need to customize the design of tablets to satisfy different needs of customers. To support product customization in this context, one specific challenge is that the customer information of tablets is relatively limited due to the newness of the product category. To tackle this challenge, this paper proposes a data mining approach to analyze the online reviews that contain customer opinions towards tablet products. In this research, tablet usages are first classified according to three user types: personal, business and student. From the online reviews, association rule mining is applied to investigate what tablet attributes are desired by specific user types. To examine the approach, the online reviews were collected from the time between April 2010 (first release of Apple iPad) and May 2011. Then, the association rule results from that time are compared with the recent tablet products on the market. It is demonstrated that online reviews as the original customer information can provide relevant insights for product customization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_8.

  2. http://www.lenovo.com/products/us/tablet/thinkpad/thinkpad-tablet-2/.

  3. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57538580-37/how-steve-jobs-7-inch-flip-flop-worked-to-apples-advantage/.

References

  • Aciar, S., Zhang, D., Simoff, S., & Debenham, J. (2007). Informed recommender: Basing recommendations on consumer product review. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22, 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agard, B., & Kusiak, A. (2004). Data-mining-based methodology for the design of product families. International Journal of Production Research, 42, 2955–2969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on very large data bases (pp. 487–499). San Francisco, USA.

  • Aral, S., & Walker, D. (2011). Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Science, 57, 1623–1639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archak, N., Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management Science, 57, 1485–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braha, D. (Ed.). (2001). Data mining for design and manufacturing: Methods and applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1992). Managing the ‘S’ curves of innovation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9, 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardie, C. (1997). Empirical methods in information extraction. AI Magazine, 18, 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54, 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary, A. K., Harding, J. A., & Tiwari, M. K. (2009). Data mining in manufacturing: A review based on the kind of knowledge. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20, 501–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, H., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., & Tablan, V. (2002). GATE: An architecture for development of robust HLT application. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL’02) (pp. 168–175). Philadelphia.

  • Du, X., Jiao, J., & Tseng, M. M. (2006). Understanding customer satisfaction in product customization. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 31, 396–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales: An empirical investigation of the movie industry. Journal of Retailing, 84, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., Schreier, M., & Kaiser, U. (2010). The ‘I Designed It Myself’ effect in mass customization. Management Science, 56, 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, J. H., & Pine, B. J, I. I. (1997). The four faces of mass customization. Harvard Business Review, 75, 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: A framework for research and development. International Journal of Production Economics, 62, 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, S. (2009). The race for perfect: Inside the quest to design the ultimate portable computer. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, J., & Kamber, M. (2006). Data mining: Concepts and techniques (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. A., Shahbaz, M., Srinivas, S., & Kusiak, A. (2006). Data mining in manufacturing: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 128, 969–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, G., Hu, L., Xue, D., Tu, Y. L., & Xiong, Y. L. (2008). Identification of the optimal product configuration and parameters based on individual customer requirements on performance and costs in one-of-a-kind production. International Journal of Production Research, 46, 3297–3326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, G., Dean, P., Yang, W., Tu, Y. L., & Xue, D. (2010). Optimal concurrent product design and process planning based on the requirements of individual customers in one-of-a-kind production. International Journal of Production Research, 48, 6341–6366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P., & Moulinier, I. (2002). Natural language processing for online applications: Text retrieval, extraction and categorization. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, J., & Tseng, M. M. (1999). A methodology of developing product family architecture for mass customization. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 10, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, J., & Zhang, Y. (2005). Product portfolio identification based on association rule mining. Computer-Aided Design, 37, 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y., & Ishino, Y. (2006). DAKA: Design activity knowledge acquisition through data-mining. International Journal of Production Research, 44, 2813–2837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, T. C. (2012). Mass customization and personalization software development: A case study eco-design product service system. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-012-0643-8.

  • Liu, C., Ramirez-Serrano, A., & Yin, G. (2012). An optimum design selection approach for product customization development. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 1433–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavridou, E., Kehagias, D. D., Tzovaras, D., & Hassapis, G. (2011). Mining affective needs of automotive industry customers for building a mass-customization recommender System. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-011-0579-4.

  • Michalek, J. J., Ceryan, O., Papalambros, P. Y., & Koren, Y. (2006). Balancing marketing and manufacturing objectives in product line design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 128, 1196–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S. K., Simpson, T. W., & Kumara, S. R. T. (2010). A methodology for knowledge discovery to support product family design. Annals of Operations Research, 174, 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa, M.M. (2013). More than words: Social networks’ texting mining for consumer brand sentiments. Expert Systems with Applications, Article in Press, doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.019

  • Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Information Retrieval, 2, 1–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B. J, I. I. (1993). Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risdiyono & Koomsap, P. , (2011). Design by customer: Concept and application. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-011-0587-4.

  • Romanowski, C. J., & Nagi, R. (2004). A data mining approach to forming generic bills of materials in support of variant design activities. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 4, 316–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, F., de Holan, P. M., & Piller, F. (2009). Cracking the code of mass customization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz, M., Srinivas, S., Harding, J. A., & Turner, M. (2006). Product design and manufacturing process improvement using association rules. Journal of Engineering Manufacture (Part B), 220, 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, X., Wang, Z., Li, P., & Feng, C. J. (2006). Integrating data mining and rough set for customer group-based discovery of product configuration rules. International Journal of Production Research, 44, 2789–2811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, T., & Tiwary, U. S. (2008). Natural language processing and information retrieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Silveira, G. D., Borenstein, D., & Fogliatto, F. S. (2001). Mass customization: Literature review and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 72, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Z., & Kusiak, A. (2009). Optimizing product configurations with a data-mining approach. International Journal of Production Research, 47, 1733–1751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. S., & Kim, H. M. (2008). Optimal product portfolio formulation by merging predictive data mining with multilevel optimization. Journal of Mechanical Design, 130, 041103. doi:10.1115/1.2838336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. S., & Kim, H. M. (2009). Data-Driven decision tree classification for product portfolio design optimization. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 9, 041004. doi:10.1115/1.3243634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. S., & Kim, H. M. (2011). Trend mining for predictive product design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133, 111008. doi:10.1115/1.4004987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Azarm, S., & Kannan, P. K. (2011). Strategic design decisions for uncertain market systems using an agent based approach. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133, doi:10.1115/1.4003843.

  • Wang, Y., & Tseng, M. M. (2012). Customized products recommendation based on probabilistic relevance model. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-012-0644-7.

  • Wassenaar, H., Chen, W., Cheng, J., & Sudjianto, A. (2005). Enhancing discrete choice demand modeling for decision-based design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 127, 514–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woon, Y. K., Ng, W. K., Li, X., & Lu, W. F. (2003). Efficient web log mining for product development. In Proceedings of the international conference on cyberworlds (pp. 294–301).

  • Yu, L., & Wang, L. (2010). Product portfolio identification with data mining based on multi-objective GA. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 21, 797–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K., & Narayanan, R. (2010). Voice of the customers: Mining online customer reviews for product feature-based ranking. In WOSN’10 Proceedings of the 3rd conference on online social networks. Berkeley, CA: USENIX Association.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West, S-EV 007.648, Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8, Canada

    Simon Li, Kamrun Nahar & Benjamin C. M. Fung

Authors
  1. Simon Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kamrun Nahar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benjamin C. M. Fung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Li.

Appendix: Original association rules of the case study

Appendix: Original association rules of the case study

See Tables 8 and 9.

Table 8 Rules of the type \(X_{U} \rightarrow Y_{A}\)
Full size table
Table 9 Rules of the type \(X_{A} \rightarrow Y_{A}\) (symmetric rules are filtered for simplicity)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, S., Nahar, K. & Fung, B.C.M. Product customization of tablet computers based on the information of online reviews by customers. J Intell Manuf 26, 97–110 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0765-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0765-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation