Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Learning and reuse of engineering ramp-up strategies for modular assembly systems

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a decision-support framework for speeding up the ramp-up of modular assembly systems by learning from past experience. Bringing an assembly system to the expected level of productivity requires engineers performing mechanical adjustments and changes to the assembly process to improve the performance. This activity is time-consuming, knowledge-intensive and highly dependent on the skills of the engineers. Learning the ramp-up process has shown to be effective for making progress faster. Our approach consists of automatically capturing information about the changes made by an operator dealing with disturbances, relating them to the modular structure of the machine and evaluating the resulting system state by analysing sensor data. The feedback thus obtained on applied adaptations is used to derive recommendations in similar contexts. Recommendations are generated with a variant of the k-nearest neighbour algorithm through searching in a multidimensional space containing previous system states. Applications of the framework include knowledge transfer among operators and machines with overlapping structure and functionality. The application of our method in a case study is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Notes

  1. http://www.frame-eu.org.

  2. \(k\) is usually a small odd integer.

References

  • Aha, D. W., Kibler, D., & Albert, M. K. (1991). Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning, 6(1), 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almgren, H. (1999a). Pilot production and manufacturing start-up in the automotive industry—Principles for improved peformance. PhD thesis, Department of Operations Management and Work Organization, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

  • Almgren, H. (1999b). Start-up of advanced manufacturing system—A case study. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 10(3), 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arai, T., Aiyama, Y., Sugi, M., & Ota, J. (2001). Holonic assembly system with plug and produce. Computers in Industry, 46, 289– 299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., & Epple, D. (1990). Learning curves in manufacturing. Science, 247(23), 920–924.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123– 1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, K. S., Goldstein. J., Ramakrishnan, R., & Shaft, U. (1999). When is “nearest neighbor” meaningful? In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on database theory.

  • Carrillo, J. E., & Gaimon, C. (2000). Improving manufacturing performance through process change and knowledge creation. Management Science, 46(2), 265–288.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, N. J. (1994). Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(6), 801–849.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cover, T., & Hart, P. (1967). Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13(1), 21–27.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dudani, S. A. (1976). The distance-weighted k-nearest-neighbor rule. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 6(4), 325–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. M., Thomas, A., & Butler, J. E. (1984). The history of progress functions as a managerial technology. Business History Review, 58(2), 204–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjällström, S., Säfsten, K., Harlin, U., & Stahre, J. (2009). Information enabling production ramp-up. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(2), 178–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frei, R., Ribeiro, L., Barata, J., & Semere, D. (2007). Evolvable assembly systems: Towards user friendly manufacturing. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE international symposium on assembly and manufacturing.

  • García-Laencina, P. J., Sancho-Gómez, J., Figueiras-Vidal, A. R., & Verleysen, M. (2008). K-nearest neighbours based on mutual information for incomplete data classification. In Proceedings of the 16th european symposium on artificial neural networks, pp. 37–42.

  • Glock, C. H., Jaber, M. Y., & Zolfaghari, S. (2012). Production planning for a ramp-up process with learning in production and growth in demand. International Journal of Production Research, 50(20), 5707–5718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaber, M. Y. (Ed.). (2011). Learning curves: Theory, models, and applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J., Ryu, K., & Kim, K. (2006). Deriving stacking strategies for export containers with uncertain weight information. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17(4), 399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koren, Y., Heisel, U., Jovane, F., Moriwaki, T., Pritschow, G., Ulsoy, G., et al. (1999). Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, 48, 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Shi, D., Charastrakul, V., & Zhou, J. (2009). Advanced P-tree based K-nearest neighbors for customer preference reasoning analysis. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20(5), 569–579.

    Article  MATH  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. L. (2012). The use of the Taguchi method with grey relational analysis and a neural network to optimize a novel GMA welding process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(5), 1671–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsland, S (2009). Machine learning: An algorithmic perspective. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

  • Mehrabi, M., Ulsoy, A., & Koren, Y. (2000). Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Key to future manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11(4), 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nembhard, H., & Birge, J. (1998). A startup procedure for process industries using a multiple objective nonlinear program. IEE Transactions, 30(4), 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngwenyama, O., Guergachi, A., & McLaren, T. (2007). Using the learning curve to maximize IT productivity: A decision analysis model for timing software upgrades. International Journal of Production Economics, 105(2), 524–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. (2009). Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates, R. F., Scrimieri, D., & Ratchev, S. (2012). Accelerated ramp-up of assembly systems through self-learning. In Proceedings of the 6th IFIP WG 5.5 international precision assembly seminar (pp. 175–182). Berlin: Springer.

  • Patel, J., & Choi, S. K. (2012). An enhanced classification approach for reliability estimation of structural systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-012-0702-1.

  • Samet, H. (2006). Foundations of multidimensional and metric data structures. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Scrimieri, D., & Ratchev, S. (2013). Capture and application of adaptation knowledge on assembly stations. In Proceedings of the 11th IFAC workshop on intelligent manufacturing systems, pp. 87–92.

  • Specht, D. F. (1992). Enhancements to probabilistic neural networks. In Proceedings international joint conference on neural networks, Vol. 1, pp. 761–768.

  • Surbier, L. (2010). Problem and interface characterization during ramp-up in the low volume industry. PhD thesis, Institut polytechnique de Grenoble, France.

  • Terwiesch, C., & Bohn, R. E. (2001). Learning and process improvement during production ramp-up. International Journal of Production Economics, 70, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terwiesch, C., & Xu, Y. (2004). The copy-exactly ramp-up strategy: trading-off learning with process change. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(1), 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchino, E., Koga, T., Misawa, H., & Suetake, N. (2013). Tissue characterization of coronary plaque by kNN classifier with fractal-based features of IVUS RF-signal. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0793-3.

  • Wasserman, P. D. (1993). Advanced methods in neural computing. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wettschereck, D., Aha, D. W., & Mohri, T. (1997). A review and empirical evaluation of feature weighting methods for a class of lazy learning algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11, 273–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. R., & Martinez, T. R. (1997). Improved heterogeneous distance functions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 6, 1–34.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. R., & Martinez, T. R. (2000). Reduction techniques for instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning, 38, 257–286.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, H., Heins, M., & Nyhuis, P. (2007). A controlling system based on cause-effect relationships for the ramp-up of production systems. Production Engineering, 1(1), 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangwill, W. I., & Kantor, P. B. (1998). Toward a theory of continuous improvement and the learning curve. Management Science, 44(7), 910–920.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by the European Commission as part of the 7th Framework Program under the Grant agreement CP-FP 229208-2, FRAME project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK

    Daniele Scrimieri & Svetan M. Ratchev

  2. ICOS Research Group, School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK

    Robert F. Oates

Authors
  1. Daniele Scrimieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert F. Oates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Svetan M. Ratchev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Scrimieri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scrimieri, D., Oates, R.F. & Ratchev, S.M. Learning and reuse of engineering ramp-up strategies for modular assembly systems. J Intell Manuf 26, 1063–1076 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0839-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0839-6

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Daniele Scrimieri View author profile