Abstract
With an increase of exotic materials and the machine process often associated with obtaining tight tolerances is that of grinding. There is an increased need in understanding the fundamental mechanics to be able to accurately model such material and grit interactions. For this reason the unit event of material interaction in grinding are investigated. Where three phenomenon’s are involved namely: rubbing, ploughing and cutting. Ploughing and rubbing essentially mean the energy is being applied less efficiently in terms of material removal. Such phenomenon usually occurs before or after cutting. Based on this distinction it is important to identify the effects of these different phenomena experienced during grinding. Two acoustic emission (AE) sensors were used to extract the very fast, transient material and grit interaction to correlate with the measured material surface. Accurate material surface profile measurements of the cut groove were made using the Fogale Photomap Profiler which enables the comparison between the corresponding AE signal scratch data. Short-time Fourier transforms and filtration techniques ensured the translation and salient components for identification were ready for classification ensuring the distinct levels between the three different Grit (SG) phenomenons. Neural networks (NNs) was used to classify and verify the demarcation of SG phenomena. After the cutting, ploughing and rubbing gave a high confidence in terms of classification accuracy. To map the results from the unit/micro to the multi/macro event both 1 \(\upmu \)m and 0.1 mm grinding test data were applied to the NN for classification. Interesting output results correlated for both classifiers signifying a distinction that there is more cutting utilisation than both ploughing and rubbing as the interaction between grit and workpiece become more involved (measured depth of cut increases). Such findings were then realised into a Simulink model as a potential control system for industrial purposes and a potential model for mapping the micro and macro mechanics seen in grinding technologies.

















Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AE:
-
Acoustic emission
- C:
-
Cutting
- DOC:
-
Depth of cut
- DSP:
-
Digital signal processing
- FFT:
-
Fast Fourier transform
- Hit 17:
-
Scratch number 17
- NN:
-
Neural network
- P:
-
Ploughing
- R:
-
Rubbing
- RMS:
-
Root mean squared
- STFT:
-
Short time Fourier transform
- SG4/SG:
-
Single grit trial 4/single grit
- T210/T212:
-
Test 210/Test 212
- WPT:
-
Wavelet packet transforms
References
Barbezat, M., Brunner, A. J., Flueler, P., Huber, C., & Kornmann, X. (2004). Acoustic emission sensor properties of active fibre composite elements compared with commercial acoustic emission sensors. Sensors and Actuators, 114, 13–20.
Boczar, T., & Lorenc, M. (2006). Time-frequency analysis of the calibrating signals generated in the Hsu–Nielsen system. Physics and Chemistry of Solid State, 7(3), 585–588.
Burke, L., & Rangwala, S. (1991). Tool condition monitoring in metal cutting: A neural network approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2, 269–280.
Chen, X., Griffin, J., & Liu, Q. (2007). Mechanical and thermal behaviours of grinding acoustic emission. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management (IJMTM), 12(1–3), 184–199.
Chen, M., & Xue, B. Y. (1999). Study on acoustic emission in the grinding process automation. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Manufacturing Engineering Division, MED Manufacturing Science and Engineering (The ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exhibition), Nashville, TN, USA, ASME, Fairfield, NJ, USA, November 14–19, 1999.
Chui, K. C. (1992). An introduction to wavelets. San Diego: Academic Press. ISBN:91-58831.
Clausen, R., Wang, C. Y., & Meding, M. (1996). Characteristics of acoustic emission during single diamond scratching of granite. Industrial Diamond Review, 3, 96–99.
Coman, R., Marinescu, I. D., et al., (1999). Acoustic emission signal—An effective tool for monitoring the grinding process. Abrasives Dec/Jan: 5.
Griffin, J., & Chen, X. (2006). Classification of the acoustic emission signals of rubbing, ploughing and cutting during single grit scratch tests. International Journal of Nanomanufacturing, 1(2), 189–209.
Griffin, J., & Chen, X., (2009a). Characteristics of the acoustic emission during horizontal single grit scratch tests—Part 1 Characteristics and identification. International Journal Abrasive Technologies—Special Issue on: Micro/Meso Mechanical Manufacturing (M4 Process), 1(4).
Griffin, J., & Chen, X., (2009b). Characteristics of the acoustic emission during horizontal single grit scratch tests—Part 2 Classification and grinding tests. International Journal Abrasive Technologies—Special Issue on: Micro/Meso Mechanical Manufacturing (M4 Process), 1(4).
Griffin, J., & Chen, X. (2009c). Multiple classification of the acoustic emission signals extracted during burn and chatter anomalies using genetic programming. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 45(11–12), 1152–1168.
Hamed, M. S. (1977). Grinding mechanics—Single grit approach. Ph.D. thesis, Leicester Polytechnic.
Holford, K. M. (2000). Acoustic emission—Basic principles and future directions. Strain, 36(2), 51–54.
Hwang, T. W., Whitenton, E. P., Hsu, N. N., Blessing, G. V., & Evans, C. J. (2000). Acoustic emission monitoring of high speed grinding of silicon nitride. Ultrasonics, 38, 614–619.
James, S. D. (1994). Verification and validation of neural networks. In P. E. Keller (Ed.), Proceedings of the neural network workshop for the hanford community (pp 76–80). Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Jemielniak, K., Kwiatkowski, L., & Wrzosek, P. (1998). Diagnosis of tool wear based on cutting forces and acoustic emission measures as inputs to a neural network. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 9, 447–455.
Kalpakjian, S., & Schmid, S. R. (2003). Manufacturing process for engineering materials (pp. 510–520). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. ISBN:0-13-040871-9.
Li, X., & Wu, J. (2000). Wavelet analysis of acoustic emission signals in boring. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 214(5), 421–424.
Liu, Q., Chen, X., & Gindy, N. (2005). Fuzzy pattern recognition of AE signals for grinding burn. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45(7), 811–818.
Mallat, S. G. (1999). A wavelet tour of signal processing (2nd ed.). San Diego, London: Academic Press.
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. H. (1943). A logical calculis of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115–133.
Opoz, T., & Chen, X. (2012). Experimental investigation of material removal mechanism in single grit grinding. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 63, 32–40.
Ozel, T., & Karpat, Y. (2005). Predictive modelling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45, 467–479.
Ren, Q., Balazinski, M., & Baron, L. (2012). Fuzzy identification of cutting acoustic emission with extended subtractive cluster analysis. Nonlinear Dynamics, 67(4), 2599–2608.
Ren, Q., Baron, L., Balazinski, M., Jemielniak, K., Botez, R., & Achiche, S. (2014). Type-2 fuzzy tool condition monitoring system based on acoustic emission in micromilling. Information Sciences, 255, 121–134.
Ren, Q., Balazinski, M., Jemielniak, K., Baron, L., & Achiche, S. (2013). Experimental and fuzzy modelling analysis on dynamic cutting force in micro milling. Soft Computing, 17, 1687–1697.
Royer, D., & Dieulesaint, E. (2000). Elastic waves in solids I, II. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Rumelhart, D. D., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533–536.
Sharma, V., Dhiman, S., Sehgal, R., & Sharma, S. (2008). Estimation of cutting forces and surface roughness for hard turning using neural networks. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 8, 215–226.
Sick, B. (2002). On-line and indirect tool wear monitoring in turning with artificial neural networks: A review of more than a decade of research. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 16, 487–546.
Smith, S. W. (1997). The scientist and engineer’s guide to digital signal processing. San Diego, CA: California Technical Publishing. ISBN:0-9660176-3-3.
Strang, G., & Nguyen, T. (1996). Wavelets and filter banks (pp. 1-29, 61-68). Cambridge: Wesley Cambridge Press. ISBN:0-9614088-7-1.
Subhash, G., Loukus, J. E., & Pandit, S. M. (2001). Application of data dependent systems approach for evaluation of fracture modes during single-grit scratching. Mechanics of Materials, 34, 25–42.
Venkatesh, K., Zhou, M., & Caudill, R. (1997). Design of neural networks for tool wear monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 8, 215–226.
Wang, H., & Subhash, G. (2002). An approximate upper bound approach for single-grit rotating scratch with a conical tool on pure metal. Wear, 252, 911–933.
Warnecke, G., & Kluge, R. (1998). Control of tolerances in turning by predictive control with neural networks. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 9, 281–287.
Webster, J., Marinescu, I., & Bennett, R. (1994). Acoustic emission for process control and monitoring of surface integrity during grinding. Annals of CIRP, 43(1), 299–304.
Xiaoli, L., Yingxue, Y., & Zhejun, Y. (1997). On-line tool condition monitoring system with wavelet fuzzy neural network. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 8, 271–276.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Griffin, J., Chen, X. Real-time simulation of neural network classifications from characteristics emitted by acoustic emission during horizontal single grit scratch tests. J Intell Manuf 27, 507–523 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0883-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0883-x